Search

Many historical narratives take for granted that a conservative “Reagan Revolution” took place in the 1980s. Though the gap between the reality and the rhetoric of the Reagan era has been subject to historiographical debate, the expression is still used today by Reagan critics and supporters alike. This article suggests that the use of revolutionary rhetoric by American conservatives is an ideological tool that tends to undermine the very meaning of revolution, thus reducing the number of politically viable alternatives that would prompt significant change. This hypothesis is explored in two ways: first, by analyzing how Ronald Reagan presented both his policy objectives and his role in American history in terms of “revolution”; and second, by measuring the extent of a selection of actual changes that took place during and after the 1980s, so as to determine how revolutionary Reagan’s legacy is.

This paper presents a brief history of the use of happiness and wellbeing rhetoric to bolster political support for the expansion of homeownership in the United States. Recent research has studied the impact of homeownership on various dimensions of wellbeing, such as crime, education, health, and civic participation. However, less attention has been given to the way in which policymakers have historically defined the pursuit of happiness as a gateway to a virtuous way of life thanks to homeownership. After exploring the relations between the right to pursue happiness and the right to own property in the American founding documents, the paper studies the happiness discourse that accompanied the rise of the suburban model of homeownership in the 20th century, followed by that which accompanied the policy shifts implemented in the late 20th century to conserve this model.