Search

Factitious disorder imposed on self (FDIS) is a mental disorder characterized by conscious manipulative behavior from patients with no clearly identifiable external objective. It affects subjects with a wide range of characteristics, only some of whom fit the stereotypical profile of the young female working in the health sector. It can take the form of a variety of symptoms or clinical signs, and is likely to involve all specialties. Munchausen syndrome is a particular form of FDIS, more prevalent in men and marked by its severity. Psychiatric comorbidities are common in patients with FDIS. Death is rare but possible, either as a result of the disease itself, complications of examinations or treatments, or suicide. The diagnostic approach must seek to identify positive arguments in favor of the disorder. Diagnosis by elimination remains possible when no other hypothesis can explain a clinical picture suggestive of FDIS. The prognosis is often poor, at least in the short and medium term. Avoiding unnecessary prescriptions is essential to prevent iatrogenesis. The management of FDIS is poorly codified. In all cases, the practitioner must adopt a non-aggressive, empathetic attitude., (Copyright © 2024 The Author. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

The diagnosis of factitious disorder can only emerge when caregivers are in difficulty in caring for their patient. This disorder is a real challenge for healthcare teams throughout the treatment, from its discovery to its treatment. Secrecy and self-inflicted injuries are components that we can be uncomfortable with as caregivers. The factitious problem requires well-coordinated care between the various specialists and often questions our practices. In this article we deal with the questions frequently asked by the care teams to the liaison psychiatrists that we are, by working on the identification of the problem in the clinic, the therapeutic issues and the attitude to adopt., Competing Interests: Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

In every day practice, it is difficult, sometimes impossible, and always ethically delicate to determine the differential diagnosis between: disorders of a somatic nature, simulation and factitious disorders, as much for the psychiatrist as for the general practitioner in the front line. Our aim is to lead a reflection on this controversial theme on the basis of a clinical illustration.

Background: The outcome for patients with dermatitis artefacta is not well known. The primary objective of this single-centre retrospective study was to describe the initial clinical aspects and the prognosis of the disease. The secondary objective was to describe the somatic and psychological management and long-term treatment of these patients., Patients and Methods: Records of patients with dermatitis artefacta followed in the dermatology department over the 15 last years were reviewed independently by 2 dermatologists. Diagnostic criteria consisted of evocative clinical pictures and the exclusion of other forms of dermatosis. Data collection included: file analysis, photographs, review questionnaires sent to general practitioner or completed during a phone call to patients (follow-up data)., Results: Thirty-one patient files were selected: 23 women and 8 men, mean age 31 years (SD = 14.8). Clinical aspects included: erythema (50%), ulceration (37%), crust (23%) and blisters (17%). The main sites were the face (67%) and arms (43%). Topical treatment was prescribed in all cases and systemic treatment was prescribed in 23% of cases. Psychological support was offered to 65% of the patients and was accepted by 50%. A follow-up study was performed for 17 patients and showed serious complications in 4 cases consisting of psychosis (n=2) and/or severe self-mutilation (n=3) occurring over several years following diagnosis (5 years for one patient and 12 years for 2 patients)., Discussion: The results confirm the usual and characteristics of dermatitis artefacta such as predominance in young female patients, with lesions affecting visible areas (face, upper legs). In contrastwith published studies, no cases of attempted suicide were observed in our series, although severe dermatitis artefacta was evidenced in only a minority of patients.

Pathomimia, or factitious disorders, are characterized by producing symptoms voluntarily with the intention of playing the role of the patient. Inspite of being considerd as a psychatric disorder, pathomimuia is often encountered in the daily professional life of doctors without being recognized or diagnosed. There are various clinical aspects of pathomimia. The items that decide the orientation of the diagnosis are essentially the uncommon and odd expression of the reported symptoms, A capricious evolution as well as the multiplicity of the past medical cases. We report a group of five patients who were followed and treated between the years 2000 and 2003. This group was composed of three men and two women with an average age of 30 years. In three cases, we found the notion of skin injury. In one case, we noted a median nerve lesion in the elbow and once in the right upper member. The evolution was performed towards recidives of the initial symptomatology with more or less long periods of improvements.

The authors describe the case of a 22-year-old soldier who has experienced two factitious mournings and Ganser's syndrome. Recent literature on these disorders and their diagnostic status are discussed.

The SPECT (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography), a new advance in medical imagery, allows the measure of cerebral blood flow and could be of interest in studying mental disorders. We report here a case of pseudo-dementia for which a SPECT has been performed before and after treatment. Mrs V., a 49 years old female, has been suffering from a dementia-like syndrome for several months. She is divorced, has two children, lives with a boy-friend, and has been working in a factory for 25 years. The first psychiatric disorders began three years ago with a gradual apragmatism and muteness. A neuroleptic treatment gave no result. One year later, without any reason, Mrs V. recovered a normal way of life. Nevertheless, from time to time, she had some periods of subexcitation. Few months later, she relapsed in her previous state of apragmatism and muteness. During a new hospitalization, neuroleptic treatment is tried again without any success. Mrs V. is then referred to us for medical screening of a dementia syndrome. In the Unit, it is difficult to communicate with her; she looks sad or amimic and has motor stereotypies (like rubbing her feet continuously against the floor). She has polidypsia and glutonny. Neurologic examination is normal, as well as EEG, X Scan, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. The Folstein Mini Mental State score is 9/30.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)