1. [Is tumour grade applicable to finasteride-treated prostate cancer?].
- Author
-
Molinié V, Ruffion A, Allory Y, Leroy X, Cochand Priollet B, Paraf F, and de la Taille A
- Subjects
- 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors, Animals, Atrophy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Enzyme Inhibitors pharmacology, Finasteride pharmacology, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Staging, Prostate drug effects, Prostatic Hyperplasia drug therapy, Prostatic Hyperplasia pathology, Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia drug therapy, Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms drug therapy, Enzyme Inhibitors therapeutic use, Finasteride therapeutic use, Prostate pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
The treatment of prostate cancer by endocrine therapy induces histological changes of benign or malignant prostate glands. Treated cancers often have a more suspicious architecture, resulting in a higher Gleason score, while their nuclear grade (WHO) appears to be more reliable due to a reduction of the size of nuclei. Most authors appear to agree that cancers discovered by biopsy in patients treated with endocrine therapy should not be graded. A review of the literature appears to indicate that finasteride has less marked histomorphological consequences than other hormone-suppressor treatments and could have a lesser effect on the Gleason score. This paper, based on a review of the literature on this subject, emphasizes: (1) the extent of histological changes after androgen deprivation endocrine therapy; (2) histological changes after Finasteride and the difficulties of histological interpretation, particularly the risk of overestimating the Gleason histoprognostic score; (3) the need for urologists to indicate any treatment by 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors or androgen deprivation when requesting histological examination; (4) the value of collecting and documenting cases observed in the Uropathology Club in collaboration with the Oncology committee of the Association Française d'Urologie.
- Published
- 2005