Search

The main aim of this work is to test different materials (activated carbon and other more "rustic" materials like clay and coal) as potential adsorbents in order to evaluate their adsorption capacity for carbendazime. The experiments were realized with certified carbendazim or with benlate solutions left to change long enough to suppose all the benomyl converted into carbendazim. The results were introduced through adsorption kinetic and isotherm forms or interpreted according to the Langmuir model. They pointed out that final elimination percentages of certified carbendazim don't exceed 55%. But even the activated carbon remains the most effective adsorbent, clay and coal present an interesting adsorption capacity, 45% for clay (but its performance is varied), 35% for coal. The presence of formulation additives has an inhibitive effect whatever the materials is. Some adsorption attempts with clay and coal mixtures (100 mg l(-1) of each one) were realized, there isn't a cumulative adsorption, final percentages of elimination are about 45%. Characterization attempts of the adsorbents pointed out that all the materials have a negative global surface charge. But clay possesses a surface charge far more negative than coal, sodipolary lap of carbendazim can further the adsorption. The measures of surface functions according to Boehm titration and capillary rising technique showed that coal differentiates from the other materials by its high capacity to establish Lifshitz-Van der Waals interactions. Carbendazim molecule can present a dipolary moment which could lead to the formation of hydrogen bonds. But results of capillary rising are to be considered by surface unities that could explain the superior adsorption capacity of clay (internal surface: 800m2 g(-1)).