Search

Copyright of Obésité is the property of Lavoisier and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: To assess professional practices of prolonged and post-term pregnancies in accordance to French guidelines. The secondary outcome was to evaluate neonatal and maternal morbidity during prolonged pregnancy., Methods: Descriptive retrospective study was conducted in the 23 maternity hospitals of perinatal network between September and December 2018. The inclusion criterion was a birth term of≥41 +0 weeks of gestation. Primary outcome was conformity to the national guidelines based on 10 items (conformity score≥80%). The secondary outcome was a composite criteria of neonatal morbidity (ventilation, resuscitation and/or Apgar score<7 at 5minutes) and maternal morbidity (obstetrical anal sphincter injury and/or postpartum hemorrhage)., Results: A total of 596 patients were included and the conformity was obtained in 65.3% of cases. Inconsistent criteria were amniotic fluid evaluation by the deepest vertical pocket (46.8%, n=279), and information of patients on prolonged pregnancy management (14.8%, n=88). Adverse perinatal outcome occurred for 40 newborns (6.0%) with shoulder dystocia (OR=5.2; CI 95%: 1.4-19.7) as a principal risk factor. Maternal morbidity outcome occurred in 70 cases (10.6%) primarily with increase in labour duration (OR=1.1 by hour of labour; CI 95%: 1.02-1.24) and prior caesarian section (OR=4.4; CI 95%: 1.8-11.0)., Conclusions: Management of prolonged and post-term pregnancies matching with the French national guidelines. Points of improvement are amniotic fluid evaluation at term by a single deepest vertical pocket, and the information about induction of labour at term., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe early complications and management of newborns during the first month of life., Methods: This systematic evidence review is based on Pubmed search, Cochrane library and experts recommendations., Results: There is no optimal time for maternity discharge for low risk newborn in regard of the literature. It depends more on the organisation of the post-discharge follow-up (professional consensus). Extreme hyperbilirubinemia expose to neonatal mortality and severe neurodevelopmental impairment for survivors (level of evidence: 1). Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia occurs in almost all newborns and may be benign if its progression is monitored (transcutaneous bilirubinometer, capillar or venous bilirubin level) at least 24hours after any early discharge (professional consensus). Asymptomatic newborns with high risks of neonatal sepsis have to be closely monitored during the first 48hours of life (professional consensus). Clinical assessment (heart murmure and femoral pulse) at least 24hours after any early discharge and at any clinical examination almost up to 1 month after birth is recommended to detect possible congenital heart disease (professional consensus). Serial clinical examination of the hips by a trained clinician in the periodic health examination of all infants until they are walking independently is recommended (professional consensus). Neonatal screening blood tests are recommended between 60 and 84hours of life in every newborns, can be advanced between 48 and 60hours if necessary but never before 48hours of life (professional consensus). Neonatal screening of deafness is recommended in every newborns and has to be assessed before maternity discharge (professional consensus). All these data have to be reported in the newborn personal medical file (professional consensus)., Conclusion: Early discharge has to be prepared during the prenatal period in order to ensure care continuity at home and to avoid any severe neonatal outcome., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the post-partum management of women and their newborn whatever the mode of delivery., Material and Methods: The PubMed database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign obstetrical societies or colleges have been consulted., Results: Because breastfeeding is associated with a decrease in neonatal morbidity (lower frequency of cardiovascular diseases, infectious, atopic or infantile obesity) (EL2) and an improvement in the cognitive development of children (EL2), exclusive and extended breastfeeding is recommended (grade B) between 4 to 6 months (Professional consensus). In order to increase the rate of breastfeeding initiation and its duration, it is recommended that health professionals work closely with mothers in their project (grade A) and to promote breastfeeding on demand (grade B). There is no scientific evidence to recommend non-pharmacological measures of inhibition of lactation (Professional consensus). Pharmacological treatments for inhibition of lactation should not be given routinely to women who do not wish to breastfeed (Professional consensus). Because of potentially serious adverse effects, bromocriptin is contraindicated in inhibiting lactation (Professional consensus). For women aware of the risks of pharmacological treatment of inhibition of lactation, lisuride and cabergolin are the preferred drugs (Professional consensus). Whatever the mode of delivery, numeration blood count is not systematically recommended in a general population (Professional consensus). Anemia must be sought only in women with bleeding or symptoms of anemia (Professional consensus). The only treatment of post-dural puncture headache is the blood patch (EL2), it must not be carried out before 48 h (Professional consensus). Women vaccination status and their family is to be assessed in the early post-partum (Professional consensus). Immediate postoperative monitoring after caesarean delivery should be performed in the recovery room, but in exceptional circumstances, it may be performed in the delivery unit provided safety rules are maintained and regulatory authorities are informed (Professional consensus). An analgesic multimodal protocol developed by the medical team should be available and oral way should be favored (Professional consensus) (grade B). For every cesarean delivery, thromboprophylaxis with elastic stockings applied on the morning of the surgery and kept for at least 7 postoperative days is recommended (Professional consensus) with or without the addition of LMWH according to the presence or not of additional risk factors, and depending on the risk factor (major, minor). Early postoperative rehabilitation is encouraged (Professional consensus). Postpartum visit should be planned 6 to 8 weeks after delivery and can be performed by an obstetrician, a gynecologist, a general practitioner or a midwife, after normal pregnancy and delivery (Professional consensus). Starting effective contraception later 21 days after delivery in women who do not want closely spaced pregnancy is recommended (grade B), and to prescribe it at the maternity (Professional consensus). According to the postpartum risk of venous thromboembolism, the combined hormonal contraceptive use before six postpartum weeks is not recommended (grade B). Rehabilitation in asymptomatic women in order to prevent urinary or anal incontinence in medium or long-term is not recommended (Expert consensus). Pelvic-floor rehabilitation using pelvic-floor muscle contraction exercises is recommended to treat persistent urinary incontinence at 3 months postpartum (grade A), regardless of the type of incontinence. Postpartum pelvic-floor rehabilitation is recommended to treat anal incontinence (grade C). Postpartum pelvic-floor rehabilitation is not recommended to treat or prevent prolapse (grade C) or dyspareunia (grade C). The optimal time for maternity discharge for low risk newborn depends more on the organisation of the post-discharge follow up (Professional consensus). The months following the birth are a transitional period, and psychological alterations concern all parents (EL2). It is more difficult in case of psychosocial risk factors (EL2). In situations of proven psychological difficulties, the impact on the psycho-emotional development of children can be important (EL3). Among these difficulties, postpartum depression is the most common situation. However, the risk is generally higher in the perinatal period for all mental disorders (EL3)., Conclusion: Postpartum is, for clinicians, a unique and privileged opportunity to address the physical, psychological, social and somatic health of their patients., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate long-term outcome after history of intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR) and/or birth small for gestational age (SGA)., Methods: This systematic evidence review is based on Pubmed search, Cochrane library and experts recommendations., Results: Neurodevelopmental evaluation at 2 years is lower in those infants, born premature or not. SGA is associated with a high risk of minor cognitive deficiencies, hyperactivity or attention deficit disorders at 5 years or scholar difficulties at 8 years. Those infants are at high risk of metabolic syndrome in adulthood. Most of them will catch up at 6 months for weight and 12 months for height. Even if IUGR is associated with high risk of bronchodysplasia, up to this day, the review of literature did not permit to evaluate respiratory outcome. Adults born SGA have good quality of live and normal professional insertion. One cohort study and more and more animal studies suggest potential trans generational effects., Conclusion: Infants born SGA and/or with history of IUGR are at high risk of minor cognitive deficiencies and scholar difficulties. They are also at high risk of metabolic syndrome in adulthood. However, prematurity seems to have a higher effect than IUGR and/or SGA on long-term outcomes., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe early complications and management of the small for gestational age (SGA) neonate., Methods: This systematic evidence review is based on Pubmed search, Cochrane library and experts recommendations. Words included in the search mainly were: small for gestational age, intrauterine growth restriction, fetal growth restriction, very low birth weight infants, neonatal management, neonatal outcome, neonatal morbidity, neonatal mortality, Results: Neonatal mortality relative risk among SGA infants is 2-4 times higher than adapted for gestational age (AGA) newborn infants, at any gestational age. SGA infants had an increased risk for perinatal asphyxia, hypothermia and hypoglycaemia during their first days of life. In the SGA preterm population, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, pulmonary hypertension and necrotising enterocolitis are significantly more frequent as compared with AGA population. Periventricular leukomalacia is not significantly different between SGA and AGA infants whereas intraventricular hemorrhage and retinopathy risks are discussed. Adaptive problems require paediatric contact before birth. Early management of the small for gestational age includes intervention to prevent hypothermia, the use of pressure controlled ventilator if needed, and close blood glucose monitoring., Conclusions: SGA infants had excess neonatal mortality and morbidity in comparison with adapted ones for gestational age (AGA) infants, especially for preterm infants., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)