Search

Surface electromyography (sEMG), as a key technology of non-invasive muscle computer interface, is an important method of human-computer interaction. We proposed a CNN-IndRNN (Convolutional Neural Network-Independent Recurrent Neural Network) hybrid algorithm to analyse sEMG signals and classify hand gestures. Ninapro’s dataset of 10 volunteers was used to develop the model, and by using only one time-domain feature (root mean square of sEMG), an average accuracy of 87.43% on 18 gestures is achieved. The proposed algorithm obtains a state-of-the-art classification performance with a significantly reduced model. In order to verify the robustness of the CNN-IndRNN model, a compact real¬time recognition system was constructed. The system was based on open-source hardware (OpenBCI) and a custom Python-based software. Results show that the 10-subject rock-paper-scissors gesture recognition accuracy reaches 99.1%.

In order to more accurately predict the prognosis and survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients, this paper used the gene expression and clinical information data of lung adenocarcinoma patients in the open database of TCGA to jointly construct a prognosis model of lung adenocarcinoma. Three difference analysis methods and univariate cox regression analysis were used as the preliminary screening method. By comparing the variable selection ability of lasso regression and random survival forest, comparing the performance of cox proportional risk regression model and random survival forest model, and integrating clinical data, a model that can more accurately predict the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma patients was constructed. After comparison and selection, lasso regression was used to select variables and cox proportional risk model was used as the prediction model. The consistency index of the model reached 0.712. The AUC for 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients in the validation set were 0.808, 0.816 and 0.754, respectively. After the fusion of clinical data, the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival prediction AUC in the validation set were 0.840, 0.836 and 0.865, respectively, indicating that the model had good predictive performance.