Search

Aim: Hip fracture management in a dedicated geriatric perioperative unit improves long-term mortality. In this "we report the" health economics evaluation of this geriatric perioperative care unit (UPOG)., Methods: This study was conducted in 2011. Direct expenditures were obtained from the Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris database, indirect expenditures from the hospital cost accounting,and financial incomes from the PMSI Pilot programme. Emergency department incomes and expenditures were estimated together with additional incomes related to orthopaedic surgery. We estimated expenditures related to operating room (OR) activities in the framework of several models, one with an emergency OR open 24h/24, and one with a standard OR. Lastly, we compared incomes/expenditures according to regular paramedical staff or according to the paramedical staff that would appear to be necessary to ensure patient care., Results: 253 patients were admitted to the UPOG during the study J215 (84%) of whom underwent surgery. The income statement was positive for both an emergency OR (+741,000 Euros) and a standard OR ( +490,000 Euros) and remained positive when paramedical staff was increased (+629,000 and +156,000 Euros, respectively)., Conclusion: The UPOG income statement shows a positive result regardless of the model used, emergency 24h/24 OR or standard OR, and even when paramedical staff is increased

Objective: Recommendations on difficult tracheal intubation constrain each surgical block to have a fiberscope available. Reusable fiberscope presents the problem of availability, the risk of non-conventional infections transmission and the cost. Single-use fiberscopes are presently available (Ambu® aScope™). This medico-economic study aims to assess the cost of using a reusable fiberscope as compared to the single use fiberscope., Study Design: Cost minimization analysis., Material: Reusable fiberscope Pentax® FB 15P (Pentax France, Argenteuil) and single-use fiberscope Ambu® aScope™ (Ambu A/S, Ballerup, Denmark)., Method: Minimization-cost analysis conducted between 2006 and 2012. The amortization cost per utilization for two reusable fiberscopes took into account the acquisition and maintenance costs, as well as the costs related to disinfection. The cost of the single use fiberscope was calculated according to its acquisition cost., Results: The total cost of the reusable material was 55,874€ over 6years, corresponding to a unitary cost of 206€ per fiberscopy. During this period, 780 sterilizations were carried out for a total cost of 32,611€. Acquisition and maintenance costs were respectively 18,382€ and 4880€. The cost of the single use fiberscope is of 200€ per fiberscopy., Conclusion: This medico-economic evaluation shows that the utilization cost of single use and reusable fiberscopes are very close. This should be analyzed at the light of some benefits of using single use devices for the difficult tracheal intubation., (Copyright © 2013 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: To refine the billing to institutions whose operations of sterilization are outsourced, a sterilization cost approach was developed. The aim of the study is to determine the value of a sterilization unit (one point "S") evolving according to investments, quantities processed, types of instrumentation or packaging., Materials and Methods: The time of preparation has been selected from all sub-processes of sterilization to determine the value of one point S. The time of preparation of sterilized large and small containers and pouches were raised. The reference time corresponds to one bag (equal to one point S). Simultaneously, the annual operating cost of sterilization was defined and divided into several areas of expenditure: employees, equipments and building depreciation, supplies, and maintenance., Results: A total of 136 crossing times of containers were measured. Time to prepare a pouch has been estimated at one minute (one S). A small container represents four S and a large container represents 10S. By dividing the operating cost of sterilization by the total number of points of sterilization over a given period, the cost of one S can be determined., Discussion/conclusion: This method differs from traditional costing method in sterilizing services, considering each item of expenditure. This point S will be the base for billing of subcontracts to other institutions., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the cost of vaccination for the Clermont-Ferrand University hospital (CHU) personnel and the cost of sick leave among vaccinated and non-vaccinated employees in 2003, 2004, and 2005., Design: The study included 7256 CHU staff (medical and non-medical personnel). The cost of sick leave was calculated on the basis of short-term disease (four to nine days) over the three months of the epidemic season in 2004, 2005, and 2006., Results: In 2005, the overall cost of vaccination was 4.02 euros per vaccinated employee. Over the three years, the total sick leave reached 804 days for employees vaccinated against 5670 for non-vaccinated employees. In 2003, 2004, and 2005, the vaccinal coverage was 13, 20.5, and 30.1%, the mean duration of sick leave was 0.16, 0.17, and 0.18 day among vaccinated staff, and 0.26, 0.39, and 0.34 day among non-vaccinated staff corresponding to a benefit per vaccinated employee of 5, 26, and 20 euros, respectively for each year. The total benefit for the institution was 86,458 euros (4630+38,168+43,660). If the vaccinated rate of 75% recommended by the Haute Autorité de santé (HAS) had been reached, the additional benefit would have been 250,193 euros (33,157+152,256+65,180)., Conclusions: The number of sick leave days and the related cost were approximately twice less important for vaccinated employees, economically justifying this vaccination including a period of weak epidemic, as checked over three consecutive years.