Search

Introduction: The presence of household waste on public roads affects environmental health leading to unsanitary conditions which may cause disease outbreaks, some of which may occur in epidemic form. Over the past two decades, waste management has become increasingly complex both for developing and underdeveloping countries. This study aims to determine the types of waste and the management of waste generated by the households., Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in the health district of Bulaska, Kasai Oriental, is a forward-looking approach based upon interview and active observation. The questionnaire was addressed to the head of household or the delegate out of 170 households, representing a convenience sample, from 21 to 25 June 2010., Results: This study revealed that: 94.7% of respondents who answered our questionnaire were female; 47% of respondents had a primary level of study; 41.1% of respondents were housewives; the average household size was 7 people per household; in 83.5% of cases the wastes generated were solid. 50% of households in the health area used public road for trash disposal., Conclusion: Given the results of this study, further development of awareness programs on environmental sanitation is necessary., Competing Interests: Conflits d’intérêts Les auteurs ne déclarent aucun conflit d’intérêt.

A link between the inhalation of asbestos fibres and the outcome of benign and malignant respiratory diseases has been established from numerous epidemiological data in occupational settings. Occupational exposure limit values have been established with a gradual lowering of these over time. Conversely, there are few epidemiological data dealing with exposure in the indoor environment. However, numerous materials and products containing asbestos (MPCA) are present in the indoor environment, due to their widespread use in the construction sector in the years between 1960 and 1990. The regulations were changed from the late 1990s, leading to a systematic inventory of the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings. The aim of this manuscript is to clarify the different types of MPCA encountered in the indoor environment, to describe the techniques used to highlight asbestos depending on the nature of the materials, the regulatory requirements relating to asbestos in non-occupational situations, and to update on the state of knowledge on asbestos-related diseases in the indoor environment., (Copyright © 2011 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

This research work focuses on the development of a new process for the decontamination of municipal wastes incinerators fly ashes. The objective of this study was to evaluate different total and selective precipitation methods for metals removal from ash decontamination leachates. The tested options include 1) use of hydrated lime and caustic soda for selective (pH 5.0) and total (pH 8.5) metal precipitation; 2) addition of different chemicals (H3PO4, Na2S and FeCl3) in a pH range from 6.0 to 9.0. Fly ash decontamination assays using alkaline and acid washing steps were initially performed using optimal conditions previously established. Treated fly ashes respected the standards based on the TCLP leaching test for all studied metals and SPLP. Total metal precipitation tests carried out at pH 8.5 achieve removal yields for all metals > or = 90% using hydrated lime and > or = 83% using caustic soda. Selective precipitation tests alone at pH 5.0 show removal yields > or = 97% for Cr and between 75 and 87% for Al and Pb. Moreover, assays carried out using a stoechiometric addition of Na2S have allowed the separation of Cd (> or = 99%) and Zn (> or = 71%) as metal sulphides (CdS and ZnS). From an economical point of view, the most interesting option seems to be the leachates neutralization at pH 7.0 using Ca(OH)2 combined with the reuse of the treated leachates in the fly ash leaching steps. Metal precipitation cost at pH 7.0 has been estimated to be 22.7 CAN dollars tct-1 using Ca(OH)2, and 26.7 CAN dollars tct-1 using NaOH.

The use of the aerobic fermentation (composting) as an alternative of the landfilling of the municipal solid wastes was studied in a pilot plant in the District of Tunis. The effectiveness of the composting, by the windrow turning technical, in producing sanitized compost was considered. Fecal coliforms, fecal streptococcis and E. coli were used as an indicator organism. In addition, the evolution of the process was monitored using sporogenous bacteria. Under the experimental conditions, approximately five logarithmic unit reduction of fecal indicators was noted after a 60 days composting.

Each day the average Frenchman produces near 1 kg of HHR, mainly paper and cardboard, vegetal and animal putrescible residues, glass, plastics, metals, ashes,... giving four important linked fractions of recyclable, biodegradable, combustible and inert matters. Production and precollection of HHR are of direct concern for the user, mainly in the collective housing; but the rubbish chute acts as a brake to the selective collection of HHR, which is one aspect of the valorization process of HHR, growing up in France. Three other treatments are used: combustion in plants with or without energy recovery, biological degradation of HHR as a compost used in agriculture, and dumping on or in the ground. All of them have advantages and disadvantages and then they must be used in complement of each other. The treatment units have some pollution effects on the environment and must be watched. Treatment refuses and solid, liquid or gaseous pollutants must be managed as much as HHR themselves. Three examples of collection-treatment-elimination french units are briefly described in Dunkerque (a mean town with selective collection), Bourgneuf-en-Mauges (a rural country with biological treatment and dumping) and Paris (a big town with a new incineration plan). Then the state of the management of HHR in France in 1989 is described with special attention to collection (99.4% of the population), recovery of glass (25%) and paper-cardboard (42%) and authorized treatment (94%) as dumping (43%), incineration (40.5%) and biological (7.5%). Accent is made about the importance of prevention (decrease of refuse production, way of consumption and life style, education of the masses) and of a good management of the HHR and of their treatment refuses and pollutants to limit environmental degradation.