Search

Comment juger une œuvre d'art? Cette question, déjà présente dans la Critique de la faculté du jugement par Emmanuel Kant, a été mis à jour en France au début des années 1990 (donc plus ou moins deux siècles plus tard), quand les Esprit et Télérama revues dédiées quelques questions à ce qu'on appelait la " crise « dans l' art contemporain, la perte savoir supposée de critères normatifs Permettre une à évaluer œuvres d' art. Après leur publication, plusieurs philosophes français - parmi lesquels Marc Jimenez, Yves Michaud, Gérard Genette, Jean-Marie Schaeffer, et Rainer Rochlitz - partie Redbourn dans le public sur le débat de jugement, plus ou moins explicitement centrée sur la troisième Critique , en termes ceux similaires à employé par Kant lui - même en 1790. Soulignant la spécificité de cette discussion, le présent document a l' intention de (re) examiner la question du jugement sur les œuvres d'art, en présentant et en répondant à deux types de relativisme et d' établir un dialogue entre l' esthétique kantienne et philosophiques contemporains. Discourses

A series of samples taken from gilded Gandharan sculpted objects in schist (both portable artifacts and architectural decorative components), coming from different sacred sites of ancient Gandhara and the Swat valley, are in the course of analytical inspection. They are studied by the means of different archaeometric techniques. Although, given the precarious conservation and rarity of the objects available for analysis, our preliminar results cannot be generalized, the emerging evidence is discussed in the light of the gilding technologies so far described in other cultural areas and periods. It is also argued that, in the Gandharan cultual complexes, the surface of sacred images might be covered with diverging procedures, dictated by various technical and/or religious concerns.

THE INFLUENCE OF THE BYZANTINE CRIMINAL LAW IN THE CODE OF DUSAN. 1349-1354 Stefan Dušan enacted the Code of Dušan in 1349. Its dispositions must be considered in relation with two Byzantine compilations that constituted the imperiale tripartite codification: the so-called Law of Justinian and to the Abridged syntagma. The Byzantine juridical influence must be considered very relevant in criminal law: public pain system, legal action ex officio by state, pain of death, physical punishments and mutilations, were juridical concepts and institutions unknown to Slav people before their convert to Christianity, and their introduction must be connected to the Byzantine religious, cultural and juridical influence. Considering the difference with Slav customary law (even if some elements derivating from it were preserved) and the connections with Greek-Roman compilations it can be underlined Dušan’s attempt to create and introduce in his empire a Byzantine legal system.