1. [Long-term Results after Endovascular and Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - a Propensity Score Matched Analysis].
- Author
-
Svidlova Y, Epple J, Lingwal N, Schmitz-Rixen T, Böckler D, and Grundmann RT
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Aged, 80 and over, Germany, Middle Aged, Comorbidity, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal surgery, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal mortality, Endovascular Procedures mortality, Propensity Score, Aortic Rupture surgery, Aortic Rupture mortality, Postoperative Complications mortality, Postoperative Complications etiology
- Abstract
Background: This retrospective propensity score matched study presents the perioperative mortality and long-term survival up to 9 years after endovascular (EVAR) and open (OAR) repair of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in Germany using health insurance data., Materials and Methods: 2170 patients treated between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2016, for rAAA within 24 hours of hospital admission and receiving blood transfusions were enrolled in the study and tracked until December 31st, 2018. For better comparability of EVAR and OAR, a 1:1 propensity score matching with 624 pairs according to patient age, sex and comorbidities was carried out using the R program (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria)., Results: In the unadjusted groups, 29.1% (631/2170) of the patients were treated with EVAR and 70.9% (1539/2170) with OAR. EVAR patients had a significantly higher overall rate of comorbidities. After adjustment, EVAR patients showed significantly better perioperative survival (EVAR 35.7%, OAR 51.0%, p = 0.000). Perioperative complications occurred in 80.4% of EVAR patients and 80.3% of OAR patients (p = 1.000). At the end of follow-up, Kaplan-Meier estimated that 15.2% of patients survived after EVAR vs. 19.5% after OAR (p = 0.027). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, OAR, age ≥ 80 years, diabetes mellitus type 2 and renal failure stages 3 to 5 had a negative impact on overall survival. Patients treated on weekdays had a significantly lower perioperative mortality than patients treated during the weekend (perioperative mortality on weekdays 40.6% vs. 53.4% during the weekend; p = 0.000) and a better overall survival as estimated by Kaplan-Meier., Conclusion: Significantly better perioperative and overall survival was observed with EVAR than with OAR in patients with rAAA. The perioperative survival benefit of EVAR was also found in patients older than 80 years. Female gender had no significant influence on perioperative mortality and overall survival. Patients treated on weekends had a significantly poorer perioperative survival than patients treated on weekdays, and this lasted through the end of follow-up. The extent to which this was dependent on hospital structure was unclear., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF