Search

Copyright of Die Gynäkologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Die Dermatologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Die Ophthalmologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Gynäkologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Ophthalmologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: We analyzed patients' characteristics and hospital admission in Germany's first and second COVID 19 wave., Methods: We include all patients hospitalized with the proven diagnosis COVID 19 admitted to the HELIOS Hospital Krefeld, Germany, in the first wave (n = 84; from 11.03.2020-30.06.2020) and the second wave (n = 344; from 01.07.2020-31.01.2021)., Results: Patients' age, gender and comorbidities were similar with the exception of venous thrombosis in medical history which was more frequent in the first wave (6 % vs 0.3 %, p = p = 0,001). At admission, there were no differences in the results of the initial lab values (c-reactive protein, leucocytes) and blood gas analyses between both groups. Treatment differed in the application of dexamethasone and anticoagulation. In the first wave, nobody received dexamethasone. However, this changed to 52.6 % of patients in the second wave for a mean length of 3.6 ± 4.1 days. Anticoagulation with double standard prophylaxis (2 × 40 mg low molecular heparin, subcutaneous) was applied in 7.1 % of patients in the first wave but 30.2 % (p = 0.002) in the second wave. In the first wave more thromboembolic events were diagnosed after admission (19.0 % vs 7.0 %, p = 0.001). In-hospital death was 26.2 % in the first wave and 15.4 % in the second wave (p = 0.0234). Most deaths were attributed to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)., Conclusion: Patients' characteristics did not vary in Germany's first and second COVID 19 wave, but anticoagulation and dexamethasone were applied more frequently in the second wave. In addition, there were fewer thromboembolic complications in the second wave., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: Following strabismus surgery, patients frequently develop variable degrees of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). These symptoms cause discomfort and result in serious complications such as intramuscular bleeding and subconjunctival hemorrhage. In children long lasting PONV can lead to and electrolyte imbalance and dehydration. A prolonged course of recovery is the consequence. For the hospital, PONV can also involve negative economic impacts because of a damaged public reputation of the institution. There is still an ongoing debate on wether prophylaxis of PONV is necessary and how the prophylaxis of PONV should be performed. On one hand, there are proponents of a liberal prophylaxis. These intend to treat almost all patients regardless of their individual risk for PONV. On the other hand, opponents point out that every medication has to be indicated individually. In their view, risk scores should be the base of a risk-adapted approach.Objectives: The aim of the study was to reduce the frequency of PONV by using an anesthetic technique adapted to the individual risk for PONV. Until now, all trials studying the efficiency of a score-based antiemetic prophylaxis were performed on adult patients. In this study, a risk-adapted approach was evaluated on children for the first time.Patients and Methods: In 92 patients, the incidence of PONV was analyzed after strabismus surgery. Before surgery we evaluated the risk factors for PONV according to the POVOC score in children (n = 45, 49 %) and the Apfel's score in adults (n = 47, 51 %). Patients with 0-2 risk factors received a balanced anesthesia (n = 47, 51 %). Those with 3-4 risk factors were operated in total IV anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol (n = 45, 49 %). In addition, as an antiemetic prophylaxis, 0.15 mg/kg dexamethason and 0.1 mg/kg ondansetron were applied in the latter patients. we documented the symptoms and severity of PONV 2, 6 and 24 h after surgery by means of a standardized questionnaire for PONV (Wengritzky-Score).Results: The incidence of PONV was 17 % (n = 16) in all of the patients. The incidence in low-risk patients receiving a BA without prophylaxis were 21 % in adults and 38 % in children. Of the patients at high risk for PONV receiving the multimodal antiemetic approach 8 % (adults) and 9 % (children) suffered from PONV. The combination of TIVA and antiemetics could reduce the incidence of PONV compared to the predicted values in a clinically relevant manner (OR = 0.26, KI: 0.76-0.87).Conclusion: The overall incidence could be reduced to a level below 20 %. Particularly in patients with a high risk of PONV, TIVA could clearly reduce the incidence. However, the incidence in patients with 2 risk factors is still high (30-39 %). Therefore, it is important to reconsider the effort involved with risk screening and individually adapting anesthesia. Risk stratification means a pre- and perioperative effort. Therefore, we advocate a more liberal approach for PONV prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The role of dexamethasone as an adjunct in peripheral nerve blockades is still unclear.Objectives: This article reviews the actual knowledge and scientific evidence for dexamethasone as an adjunct in peripheral regional anesthesia. Moreover, it discusses the benefits of the systemic versus the perineural mode of application.Results: Dexamethasone prolongs sensible as well as motor blockades in peripheral nerve blocks when applied intravenously or perineurally. Regarding potentially local neurotoxicity, published patient data are not sufficient for final conclusions.Conclusions: After reviewing the actual literature, the authors prefer a systemic application mode (intravenously) over a perineural route of administration of dexamethasone as an adjunct for peripheral nerve blocks. This is due to the better understanding of potential side effects of the drug when applied intravenously. Dexamethasone might be a useful drug adjunct to prolong peripheral single shot nerve blocks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 50-year-old female farmer was initially diagnosed with generalized granuloma annulare and treated with local steroids and ultraviolet (UV) light therapy for 10 years, albeit without success. A histopathological examination in our clinic changed the diagnosis to Wells' syndrome, based on the typical findings of eosinophilic cellulitis together with flame figures. A systemic approach with pulse steroid therapy resulted in complete remission of pruritus and skin manifestations. This case demonstrates successful treatment of a patient with eosinophilic cellulitis., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Intravitreal injection treatment for the management of macular edema as an expression of increased capillary permeability and leakage constitute the mainstay of treatment in retinal vein occlusion. In contrast to diabetic retinopathy or neovascular age-related macular degeneration, permanent and complete functional and morphological restoration can be achieved, as retinal vein occlusions are usually associated with risk factors, but do not represent the manifestation form of an underlying systemic or degenerative chronic disorder; however, successful long-term management of retinal vein occlusion -associated macular edema usually requires intensive and also long-term continued treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors or with a less favorable side effect profile, dexamethasone. A functional treatment success can be maintained over the long term by both pro re nata (PRN) or treat and extend (T&E) regimens. In contrast, according to the currently available data, the combination of anti-VEGF administration and grid laser treatment has no additional benefit compared to monotherapy. In patients with recalcitrant macular edema, switching to another intravitreal agent may be considered during the course of treatment, although a true therapeutic benefit with respect to the development of visual acuity has not yet been proven. The current review summarizes the relevant aspects in the management of RVO-associated macular edema and provides the foundations for the application of successful treatment strategies., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: A length polymorphism in the promoter region of the serotonin transporter gene ( 5-HTTLPR) is associated with both depression and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) system activity. A dysregulation of the HPA system is considered to be a candidate endophenotype of depression. The objective of the present study was an investigation of a possible gene-endophenotype-interaction between 5-HTTLPR and HPA system activity in a sample of inpatients with major depression. Materials and methods: A total of 237 inpatients with major depression were genotyped for 5-HTTLPR and participated in a combined dexamethasone-corticotropin-releasing hormone test (Dex-CRH test) as well as using the Hamilton score (Hamilton rating scale for depression) to determine the severity of the psychopathology. Results: Patients with the ss-genotype showed a significantly higher HPA -system activity in comparison to patients with the lI-genotype, but no association between 5-HTTLPR and the severity of psychopathology could be detected. Conclusions: The results of the current study demonstrate an influence of 5-HTTLPR on dysregulation of the HPA system in patients with major depression and support the hypothesis that 5-HTTLPR- and HPA-system-interaction constitutes an important component in the pathogenesis of depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Introduction of lenalidomide has expanded the therapeutic options for refractory and recurrent multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, the application of the approved doses may be difficult in some patients due to adverse effects. Experimental design: Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in 10 patients with relapsed and refractory MM who received a reduced dose due to leukopenia (4), polyneuropathy (1), muscle cramps (1), thrombocytopenia (1), renal insufficiency (1), at the request of patient (1), as continuous therapy (1), either from the beginning (2) or during treatment (8). They received lenalidomide at a mean (median) daily dose of 14 (15) mg/d once a day (days 1–21 every 28 days) in combination with dexamethasone at a mean (median) dose of 17.6 (28) mg per day (4–40 mg) on days 1–4, 9–12 and 17–20. Results: Mean (median) duration of treatment with lenalidomide was 15.1 (15) months. Partial response or better was reported in seven and minimal response or better was reported in eight patients. Mean (median) values for time-to-progression (TTP) and for progression-free survival (PFS) were 8.7 (4) months. Mean overall survival (OS) has not been reached, all patients are still alive. Conclusion: In conclusion, dose-reduced lenalidomide is an effective and well tolerated treatment for patients with recurrent or refractory MM who cannot tolerate full doses.

Background: Lenalidomide, a derivate of thalidomide, in combination with dexamethasone is indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma in patients who have received at least one prior therapy. In the USA, lenalidomide is also licensed for the treatment of a certain form of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Monitoring of off-label use in Germany is part of the risk management plan mandated by the regulatory authority. Material and methods: Our retrospective epidemiological study was based on claims data of the year 2007 from four statutory health insurances with more than 14 million enrollees. Annual incidence was calculated by dividing the total number of new lenalidomide users by the sum of person-years of the at-risk population. Potential off-label use was identified by an algorithm searching for a diagnosis of multiple myeloma in the quarter of the lenalidomide prescription and the four preceding quarters. Results: In 2007, 235 lenalidomide users were identified. Incidence of lenalidomide use was 4.0 per 100,000 person years (95% CI: 3.5-4.5). In 40 (17.0%) users of lenalidomide, no diagnosis of multiple myeloma was found. Of the 40 off-label users, 29 (72.5%) had a diagnosis of MDS. Conclusion: Off-label use of lenalidomide in Germany was low and mainly related to MDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of HNO is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Droperidol had been used as an effective antiemetic since the 1970s but was withdrawn from the market in 2001 because of a black box warning about QT prolongation and possible cardiac arrhythmia after high doses. In the meantime the black box warning has seriously been questioned and parenteral droperidol has again been licensed in 2008. Because droperidol acts on dopaminergic receptors different to 5-HT antagonists and dexamethasone, it could possibly serve as a rescue drug after failed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis. Persistent PONV after the recommended prophylaxis is a significant problem in pediatric anesthesia but a satisfactory strategy has not yet been defined. Therefore a retrospective audit was performed in order to evaluate whether low-dose droperidol (10 µg/kgBW) would be an effective rescue drug for failed antiemetic prophylaxis. Patients and methods: The electronic anesthesia patient data base of the University Children's Hospital Zurich was searched from 2004-2009 for patients who received low-dose droperidol in the postanesthesia care unit as rescue therapy for persistent PONV after antiemetic prophylaxis. Based on the recorded electronic data the effectiveness of low-dose droperidol as PONV rescue therapy and possible side effects were analyzed. Results: A total of 338 patients who received droperidol were found from a total of 34,032 patients and the charts were analyzed. Of these patients 134 were excluded because they had received droperidol for indications other than PONV, 43 patients were excluded because they had not received antiemetic prophylaxis before droperidol and in 17 patients the data were incomplete, leaving 144 patients with an average age of 12.3 years (interquartile range IQR 9.5-15.2 years) for analysis. The upper range of ages resulted from patients with chronic diseases who were still being treated in the Children's Hospital. Low-dose droperidol was given because of persistent nausea to 59 patients (41%) and to 85 patients (59%) for persistent vomiting. Initial antiemetic prophylaxis and/or therapy had consisted of dexamethasone plus tropisetrone in 80 patients and tropisetrone or dexamethasone alone in 64 patients. In 128 patients (89%) rescue therapy with a median dose of 10.9 µg/kgBW droperidol was effective but vomiting persisted in 16 patients (11%). Sedation was the only side effect recorded and this was observed in 39 patients (27%). Conclusions: Low-dose droperidol (10 µg/kgBW) was found to be effective as rescue medication in pediatric patients experiencing PONV despite various prophylactic antiemetic regimens. No neurological or cardiopulmonary side effects were recorded after this low dosage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Urologe A is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Gynäkologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Gynäkologische Endokrinologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of HNO is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of HNO is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of HNO is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Untreated, one third of patients who undergo surgery will have postoperative nausea and vomiting. Although many trials have been conducted, the relative benefits of prophylactic antiemetic interventions given alone or in combination remain unknown.Methods: In a randomized, controlled trial of factorial design, 5,199 patients at high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting were randomly assigned to 1 of 64 possible combinations of 6 prophylactic interventions: 1) 4 mg of ondansetron or no ondansetron; 2) 4 mg of dexamethasone or no dexamethasone; 3) 1.25 mg of droperidol or no droperidol; 4) propofol or a volatile anesthetic; 5) nitrogen or nitrous oxide; 6) remifentanil or fentanyl. The primary aim parameter was nausea and vomiting within 24 h after surgery, which was evaluated blindly.Results: Ondansetron, dexamethasone, and droperidol each reduced the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting by about 26%, propofol reduced the risk by 19%, and nitrogen by 12%. The risk reduction with both of these agents (i.e., total intravenous anesthesia) was thus similar to that observed with each of the antiemetics alone. All the interventions acted independently of each other and independently of the patients' baseline risk. Consequently, the relative risks associated with the combined interventions could be estimated by multiplying the relative risks associated with each intervention. However, absolute risk reduction was a critical function of patients' baseline risk.Conclusions: Because antiemetic interventions are similarly effective and act independently, the safest or least expensive should be used first. Prophylaxis is rarely warranted in low-risk patients, moderate-risk patients may benefit from a single intervention, and multiple interventions should be reserved for high-risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Onkologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Ophthalmologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Ophthalmologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Autonomous cortisol secretion was mentioned for the first time in 2016 in the European Guideline on the management of adrenal incidentalomas., Objectives: Review of the state of knowledge on diagnosis, epidemiology, co-morbidities, mortality and treatment of autonomous cortisol secretion in comparison to non-hormone producing adenomas. Recommendation for clinical practice based on the current European guideline., Materials Und Methods: Analysis of relevant clinical studies, discussion of basic literature and expert opinions., Results and Conclusions: Autonomous cortisol secretion is a term used to describe abnormal cortisol secretion diagnosed by a pathological 1‑mg dexamethasone suppression test in patients with adrenal incidentaloma, but without clinical manifestation of overt Cushing's syndrome. It is associated with increased mortality and morbidity, especially hypertension, diabetes mellitus type II, dyslipidemia and obesity. Adrenalectomy, as the only specific therapy option, should be considered in an interdisciplinary tumour board., (© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

In patients with adrenal hirsutism or enzyme deficiencies in steroidogenesis, elevated adrenal androgens could be normalized by dexamethasone. We were interested to see if dexamethasone would be as effective as cyproterone acetate in treating hirsutism in selected patients with adrenal pathogenesis. Therefore 28 patients with hirsutism of adrenal origin or enzyme deficiency were treated cyclically either with cyproterone acetate and ethinylestradiol (2 mg cyproterone acetate+0.035 mg ethinyl-estradiol days 1-21, +10mg cyproterone acetate days 1-15) ( n=15) or with 0.25-0.5 mg dexamethasone daily at 10 pm ( n=13). In the dexamethasone group there was a significant drop in dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels within 9 months, but there was a diminution in hirsutism in only four women (31%); in four out of seven menstrual irregularities decreased. In the cyproterone acetate group hirsutism diminished significantly in 66% ( n=10) without suppression of adrenal androgens. Weight gain occurred in a few cases in both groups; other side effects developed in 33% in the cyproterone acetate group. Preselection of patients with hirsutism is useful with respect to diagnosis; adrenal pathogenesis should not generally indicate dexamethasone treatment of hirsutism unless there is a desire for pregnancy, because cyproterone acetate is a more powerful agent in reducing hair growth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To describe the clinical results and the feasibility of a phase II dose escalation study of small boost target volumes with a radiosurgical technique in patients with positive early postoperative MRI scans.Patients and Method: Since 1986, 35 patients were treated within a concept for first line therapy. Including criteria were residual tumor < or = 5 cm and Karnofsky performance score > or = 70. The mean age was 54.5 years. The treatment concept included an operation for reduction of tumor volume and a postoperative irradiation. The postoperative irradiation was divided in 2 parts: first, a hyperfractionated (1.8 Gy single dose twice a day, 54 Gy total dose) irradiation was performed containing the tumor and the edema with a 2 cm safety margin. Secondly, a radiosurgical boost dose was delivered. The target volume of this radiosurgery was the contrast enhancing residual tumor in early postoperative MRI scans. The median boost dose was 15 Gy. Survival curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Quality of life was evaluated using objective criteria such as neurological findings, frequency of seizures and steroid medication.Results: The median survival calculated from the time of diagnosis was 10.1 months. The 1- and 2-year survival rate were 35% and 6%, respectively. Young age tended to longer survival, patients younger than 53 years had a median survival of 10.4 months whereas patients older than 53 years showed a median survival of 9.2 months. The mean value of the boost volume was 22 cm3. Patients with smaller volumes had a median survival of 10.1 months and patients with bigger volumes showed a median survival of 9.9 months, 4.5 months after therapy, 75% of the patients showed improved or stable quality of life.Conclusion: The feasibility of a radiosurgically delivered boost dose after postoperative irradiation could be demonstrated. The observed survival rate is comparable to the survival rates reported in the literature. Whether or not the radiosurgery after postoperative irradiation is able to prolong survival can only be evaluated in a randomized phase III trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Archiv für Gynäkologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Schmerz is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Ophthalmologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)