Search

The research considers experimental philosophy as a new philosophical movement. It emerged in Western intellectual thought in the 21st century against the background of the methodological crisis of analytic philosophy. Its representatives justify that the philosopher himself should actively master experimental methods of psychology and social sciences. They are opposing themselves to the so-called “cabinet” speculative philosophy. The main topic of their research is the “philosophical intuition” of ordinary consciousness. They also focus on the project of metaphilosophy. This movement has quite a few critics. They fear that if philosophy integrates with science it will lose its autonomy. Today one of the most promising interdisciplinary scientific fields is cognitive science, which actively uses experimental data. The research exploring the possibilities of dialogue between philosophy and cognitive science on a variety of issues, primarily on the question of consciousness and human cognitive activity. The research proves that by experimental philosophy we can mean a philosophy that is open to making sense of new data obtained experimentally. It retains its autonomy not being fully integrated into science but actively participates in scientific development, as well as acts as an ethical regulator of scientific and technological progress. We propose the interdisciplinary study of hybrid intelligence as one of the promising directions for the development of experimental philosophy. We reveal the main features of creating hybrid intelligent systems at the present stage. On the example of group collaboration of professionals of natural science and socio-humanities profile of the laboratory “Neurointerfaces” operating on the basis of the Research Center of neurotechnology of the Southern Federal University we demonstrate the feasibility of conducting research in experimental philosophy to study hybrid intelligence. The study emphasizes the importance and significance of bioethics and ethical regulation in the modern scientific and experimental field.

Copyright of Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin & Sporttraumatologie is the property of Schwiez Zschr Sportmed Sporttraumatologie and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Laboratory analyses in sports medicine are relevant for three reasons: 1. In actively exercising individuals laboratory analysis are one of the central elements in the diagnosis of diseases and overreaching. 2. Regularly done laboratory analysis in competitive athletes with high load of training and competition may help to detect certain deficiencies early on. 3. Physical activity in general and competitive exercise training specifically do change certain routine laboratory parameters significantly although not reflecting pathological changes. These so-called preanalytic variations should be taken into consideration while interpreting laboratory data in medical emergency and routine diagnostics. This article intends to help the physician to interprete laboratory data of actively exercising sportsmen.

Self-rating scales have proved to be essential in the study of depersonalisation, which regrettably, is still seldom recognised in clinical practice. In recent studies the Cambridge Depersonalisation Scale (CDS) has emerged as an useful instrument for the study of depersonalisation. Here we report a validation study of the authorised German version of the CDS in a sample of 91 inpatients, 43 of whom had pathological depersonalisation and 48 without pathological depersonalisation. The SCID-D Interview for depersonalisation and derealisation was used as the gold standard and the German version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale was used to test the external validity of the scale. The German version of the CDS was found to have high internal consistency and reliability (alpha = 0,95 and Guttman Split-half = 0,95) and could differentiate patients with pathological depersonalisation from the control group. We therefore conclude that the German version of the CDS can be considered as reliable and valid.