Search

Copyright of Trauma und Berufskrankheit is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Scars from Nonsuicidal Self-Injury - What Plastic Surgery Can Do Abstract. Objective: Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) can induce characteristic scar patterns indicating the origin of these scars. This frequently results in the stigmatization of the involved patients with far-reaching consequences for their daily routine and quality of life. Despite patients being highly interested in scar correction, the potential of surgical therapy to alleviate NSSI-prone behavior and its help in destigmatizing surgical corrections and esthetic improvements in these situations are not well-known. Method: Over a period of 5 years, we analyzed 600 patients requesting NSSI scar treatment in our outpatient clinic. We collected data on the motivation for a scar correction, on the maturity of the scars, the involved body parts, and potential prior scar treatments as well as the amount, localization, and type of performed surgical procedures in our institution. Results: Stigmatization (57 %) and limitations in choice of clothing (18 %) were the most frequent reasons given for scar correction. We performed 358 dermabrasions and 55 serial excisions on these patients, nine combinations of both, and 13 other procedures. Conclusions: Plastic surgery offers multiple possibilities to reduce the stigmatization of patients with NSSI scars, who should thus be informed early about their choices.

The concept of indication is used in many ways in medicine and in the healthcare industry. In connection with "medical" and/or "physician-based", it is often used to describe the path that a doctor and a patient take - after weighing up all available information - to describe a common treatment goal and to define measures derived from that goal. From today's perspective, however, there is a third factor that plays a role: the healthcare industry, here in particular in the form of health insurance (both statutory health insurance and private health insurance), but more recently also in the form of financial administration. Plastic surgery is faced with the dilemma that, although there is a medically proven indication in many cases, neither the payers nor the financial courts or offices are willing to follow the medical assessment and reject the indication (usually without justification). This article offers support in defining an indication for aesthetic plastic surgery., Competing Interests: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite its high prevalence in adolescents and young adults, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is poorly known and understood in areas other than psychiatry. Due to this lack of knowledge, affected patients often face a lack of understanding as well as rejection and discrimination when seeking help from medical professionals. This not only hampers a lasting improvement of NSSI and the development of a trustful physician-patient relationship but may also lead to traumatisation of affected patients. Based on our patients' data, this article aims to inform interested plastic surgeons about NSSI and thus to support the treatment of affected patients., Patients and Methods: 600 patients with scars from NSSI presenting to our outpatient clinic for the first time during the past five years were enrolled in this study. Extensive data collected during the first contact was analysed and compared with the current literature., Results: 95 % of the patients were female; 5 % were male. On average, patients presented 8.4 years after the last NSSI event and with a mean age of 26 years. NSSI scars were most often located on the left forearm (48 %), followed by both forearms (40 %), the left upper arm (20 %), both upper arms (15 %) and both thighs (14 %). In 57 % of patients, scars were only present on one side. A mean of 380 cm2 of the body surface was affected by NSSI scars. 47 % of patients reported having at least one additional diagnosis, with thyroid dysfunction and depression being the most common. 21 % of patients had ongoing psychiatric or psychological therapy at the time of their first consultation in our clinic., Conclusion: Our data provides first insight into a large population of NSSI patients seeking treatment options for their NSSI-associated scars in a plastic surgery outpatient clinic. Most patients were female with scars located on their forearms. A mean of more than 8 years had passed between their last NSSI and their first presentation to our clinic. Our findings offer a data-based approach to a group of patients with a disease pattern that is largely misunderstood in surgical disciplines and needs more attention, especially in the light of its high prevalence and life-long consequences., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) enables the restoration of complex tissue defects. Since the first successful hand and face transplants were performed, clinical and experimental research has consistently improved immunosuppressive therapies. The incubation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with mitomycin C (MMC) results in immunomodulatory cells (MICs). In previous studies, the systemic application of MICs on the day of allogeneic hind limb transplantation led to a significant immunosuppression in rats. The aim of this study is to further investigate the optimal point in time of MIC application in a complex VCA model., Material and Methods: In six groups, 60 allogeneic hind limb transplantations were performed. Fully mismatched rats were used as hind limb donors [Lewis (LEW)] and recipients [Brown-Norway (BN)]. Group A received donor-derived MICs seven days preoperatively. Group B received no immunosuppression; group C received untreated PBMCs seven days prior to transplantation. Animals in group D received cell culture media, whereas group E was treated with a standard immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus and prednisolone. In group F, syngeneic hind limb transplantations (BN→BN) were performed. Transplant rejection was assessed clinically and histologically., Results: Group A showed a significantly earlier onset of allograft rejection after 3.5 ± 0.2 days (p < 0.01) when compared with control groups B, C and D (5.5 ± 0.7, 5.3 ± 0.7 und 5.7 ± 0.5). Groups E and F showedno allograft rejection., Conclusion: This study shows that the time of application determines the immunomodulatory effects of MICs. Whereas the systemic application of MICs on the day of transplantation led to a significant immunosuppression in previous studies, this study demonstrates that preoperative injections of MICs lead to an acceleration of allotransplant rejection. Follow-up studies are necessary to investigate further modifications of application time as well as dose-effect relations and cell characteristics of these potential immunosuppressive cells., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

The German equivalent of the USA CPT Code dates in his surgical parts back to 1996. This implies that modern surgical procedures cannot be adequately coded.This article discusses the codes that are frequently challenged by insurance companies and justifies their application with relevant judicial decisions., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Background:  The loss of a breast, and thus of the female body shape, is often extremely traumatising for women affected. Although free flap grafts have become the gold standard in reconstructive breast surgery, it has not been possible to date to unequivocally document their superiority over conventional alternative techniques. To date, there are no data on the care situation in Germany. Neither the number of reconstructions nor the proportion of the individual techniques is known. A prospective online registry has been set up in order to systematically collect and transparently present the structure and quality of care. The long-term goals are to record the existing quality of care, improve deficits and to certify centres with the appropriate expertise to establish a high level of care nationwide., Methods:  For this purpose, the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC) has set up an internet-based database in which treatment data are recorded anonymously. As part of a certification process, auditors checked structure quality, compliance with specifications, and the stringency of the data entered in comparison with the hospital's internal documentation. If the evaluation is positive, the DGPRÄC quality seal is awarded., Results:  Since its introduction in 2012, the database has provided validated information. Initially, only a few departments were prepared to present their results transparently. However, the number has grown steadily in recent years. As a result, the quality recording assumed a pioneering function nationwide and can now be used as a reliable source of information by patients and doctors. The DGPRÄC website features a map of the centres, which are colour-coded according to their respective qualifications. It is thus possible to find a qualified plastic surgeon with comprehensive expertise in acceptable proximity to every oncological breast centre., Conclusion:  The database provides an overview of the quality of the various surgical techniques and thus the possibility of serious self monitoring and scientific analysis. The systematic collection of data has contributed to strengthening the position of plastic surgery in the field of reconstructive breast surgery. However, the financial and personnel resources required to establish the database were clearly underestimated., Competing Interests: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Objective: Soft-tissue coverage by tissue transposition from a neighboring finger of a palmar (classic cross-finger flap) or dorsal (reversed cross-finger flap) soft-tissue defect of the phalanges., Indications: Conventional cross-finger flap: soft-tissue defects in the proximal or middle phalanges not suitable for skin transplantation. Reversed cross-finger flap: soft-tissue defects in the dorsal proximal or middle phalanges not suitable for skin transplantation., Contraindications: Extensive tissue defects crossing the finger joints. Concomitant injuries of the neighboring fingers., Surgical Technique: Harvesting of an adipocutaneous flap from the dorsum of the finger to the midlateral line, preserving the paratenon of the donor phalanx. Transfer of the flap into the defect of the neighboring finger and coverage of the donor site by full-thickness skin grafting. For the reversed cross-finger flap preparation of a subcutaneous flap with preservation of the peritenon by separating a skin flap from the subcutaneous fat according to the "open book - closed book" technique. Transection of the flap pedicle after 14-21 days., Postoperative Management: Immobilization of both fingers until the pedicle is transected. Active and passive physiotherapy exercises after 5-7 days., Results: Uneventful healing in all 18 cross-finger flaps, resulting in an average DASH Score (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) of 18 after an average follow-up of 38 months (12-81 months). Twelve results were subjectively judged as "very good" or "good", 16 patients complained about intermittent cold intolerance.