Search

Status epilepticus is characterized by persistent or repetitive seizures which, without successful treatment, can lead to neuronal damage, neurological deficits and death of the patient.While status epilepticus with motor symptoms can usually be clinically diagnosed, nonconvulsive status epilepticus is often clinically overlooked due to its ambiguous semiology, so that electroencephalography (EEG) recording is necessary. The treatment of status epilepticus is performed in four treatment steps, whereby a difficult to treat status epilepticus is present from the third step at the latest and intensive medical care of the patient is necessary. Timely initiation of treatment and sufficient dosage of anticonvulsive medication are decisive for the success of treatment. There is little evidence for the "late" stages of treatment. Intensive medical measures pose the risk of complications that worsen the prognosis. Especially in nonconvulsive status epilepticus, the use of anesthetics must be weighed against possible complications of mechanical ventilation., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the sudden and unexpected death of an epilepsy patient, which occurs under benign circumstances without evidence of typical causes of death. SUDEP concerns all epilepsy patients. The individual risk depends on the characteristics of the epilepsy and seizures as well as on living conditions. Focal to bilateral and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (TCS), nocturnal seizures and lack of nocturnal supervision increase the risk. Most SUDEP cases are due to a fatal cascade of apnea, hypoxemia and asystole in the aftermath of a TCS. Two thirds of SUDEP cases in unsupervised epilepsy patients with TCS could probably be prevented. Wearables can detect TCS and alert caregivers. SUDEP information is desired by most patients and relatives, has a favorable impact on treatment adherence and behavior and has no negative effects on mood and quality of life.Recommendations of the committee on patient safety of the German Society of Epileptology: the ultimate treatment goal is seizure freedom. If this cannot be achieved, control of TCS should be sought. All epilepsy patients and their relatives should be informed about SUDEP and risk factors. Patients and relatives should be informed about measures to counteract the elevated risk and imminent SUDEP. The counselling should be performed during a face-to-face discussion, at the time of first diagnosis or during follow-up visits. The counselling should be documented. Wearables for TCS detection can be recommended. If TCS persist, therapeutic efforts should be continued. The bereaved should be contacted after a SUDEP., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Stimulation has been performed experimentally and in small case series to treat epilepsy since the 1970s. Since the introduction of vagus nerve stimulation in 1997 and intracranial stimulation methods in 2011 into patient care, invasive stimulation has become a rapidly developing but infrequently used therapeutic option in Europe. Whereas vagus nerve stimulation is frequently used, particularly in the USA, intracranial stimulation differs in its regional availability. In order to improve the efficacy of stimulation, develop criteria for its use and assure low complication rates, a concentration on experienced centers and multicenter data acquisition and sharing are needed.Invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring with subdural electrodes and especially with stereotactically implanted depth electrodes have been used increasingly more often for presurgical evaluation in recent years. They are applied when non-invasive diagnostics show insufficient results to exactly identify the location and extent of the epileptogenic zone or cannot be adequately distinguished from eloquent cortex areas. Complications include intracranial hemorrhage, infections and increased intracranial pressure but lasting deficits or even death are rare (≤2 %). The outcome of invasive monitoring is inferior to non-invasive monitoring because of the higher degree of complexity of the cases; however, it is far superior to the seizure-free rates achieved by anticonvulsant drug treatment alone.

Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases and represents a significant burden for patients, their families and society. In more than 75 % of patients anticonvulsant therapy consists of valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine or levetiracetam. There is a need for polytherapy in drug-refractory patients and they suffer from negative effects on quality of life and employment that is associated with high indirect costs. To allow a comprehensive treatment in this patient group, access to new anticonvulsants with novel modes of action is needed; however, all applications for new antiepileptic drugs failed to prove added benefits during the Pharmaceutical Market Restructuring Act (AMNOG) in Germany. One of the main reasons is the mandatory definition of a standard comparative therapy. It remains unclear whether there will be studies in the future which will fulfill the requirements of the current version of AMNOG. Observational studies after approval and marketing of new antiepileptic drugs could be better alternatives to prove added benefits for individual patients in the current German healthcare system.

Regarding epilepsy several new developments can be reported. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has suggested a new definition of epilepsy, for the first time including a definition of epilepsy resolution. Progress in the diagnosis relates to new genetic findings, improvements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the increasing use of stereo electroencephalograms (sEEG). Regarding treatment there are new clinically relevant data on the pathophysiology and prevention of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Zonisamide has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for monotherapy in adults with focal seizures and combination therapy in children aged ≥ 6 years. Retigabin and perampanel have been approved but are currently taken off the market in Germany (only) because the Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (GBA, Joint Federal Committee) did not find any additional therapeutic value as compared to lamotrigine due to a lack of data. A decision regarding a new application for perampanel is pending. Regarding surgical treatment novel ablation techniques (e.g. stereotactic radiofrequency and laser ablation as well as focussed ultrasound ablation) and brain stimulation paradigms are under investigation. Experimental studies, generously supported by the European Union (EU) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) are focusing on (opto-)genetic (e.g. using lentoviral transfection), epigenetic (e.g. micro-RNA-related) approaches and on the investigation of neuronal micronetworks.

The term non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) refers to a heterogeneous group of diseases with different etiology, prognosis and treatment. The different forms of NCSE comprise about 25-50% of all status epilepticus cases. The most frequent form encountered in clinical practice is complex-partial SE but the rarer conditions of absence status, aura status and subtle SE are also included under this category. A diagnosis of NCSE should be considered in all patients with otherwise unexplained changes in consciousness or behavior and this diagnosis demands rapid further diagnostic work up including clinical examination, a detailed clinical history from the patient or an accompanying person, cranial computed tomography (CCT) and an electroencephalogram (EEG). If signs of an infectious or inflammatory disorder are present, a spinal tap is indicated. The EEG is of high relevance although interpretation can be challenging in NCSE.Absence status is usually treated by benzodiazepines and if necessary a broad spectrum anticonvulsive drug (ACD) such as valproic acid (VPA) can be added. The treatment of complex-partial SE follows the same scheme as that of generalized tonic-clonic SE and an initial benzodiazepine (i.v. lorazepam or intramuscular midazolam) followed by a bolus of one of the ACDs available as i.v. solution (e.g. VPA, phenytoin, phenobarbitol or levetiracetam). The third treatment step is general anesthesia if NCSE fails to be controlled. The aggressiveness of the applied therapy depends on the severity of the NCSE and the general condition of the patient. The prognosis is determined by the subtype of NCSE and the underlying etiology.

In 2010 the International League against Epilepsy published a new classification of epilepsies. A major advance of this classification system is the acknowledgment of a genetic or pathologic-anatomic basis of epilepsy as important predictors of outcome (cause matters). This applies in particular to structural-metabolic lesions, which were frequently recognized in surgical specimens obtained from patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, i.e. hippocampal sclerosis, glioneuronal tumors, focal cortical dysplasias, vascular malformations, ischemia, intracerebral hemorrhage, glial scars or inflammation. A better understanding and classification of the etiopathology as well as the underlying molecular mechanisms will help to anticipate and appreciate the clinical course of a disease as well as to develop new and targeted drug treatment. Surgically available human brain tissue will be most helpful to support this approach but will also need careful neuropathological evaluation with accurate classification systems and use of terminology.

Purpose: Primary brain tumors and metastases are common causes of symptomatic epilepsy. Seizures, neurological and neuropsychological deficits can interfere with driving ability. The present paper aims to systematically review the incidence of epileptic seizures in brain tumor patients and to discuss driving ability in the context of the current German guidelines and expert opinions., Methods: To evaluate the incidence of epileptic seizures which occur at the beginning and in the course of the disease, we performed a systematic literature research in PubMed from 1960 to 2007. Additionally on the basis of this data we performed a survey collecting expert opinions regarding the driving ability of brain tumor patients from members of the German working groups "Arbeitsgemeinschaft für prächirurgische Epilepsiediagnostik und operative Epilepsietherapie" (Working Group for Presurgical Epilepsy Diagnostics and Operative Epileptic Therapy) and "Neuroonkologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft" (Neuro-oncological Working Group)., Results: The incidence of epileptic seizures depends on the entity, dignity and localization of the tumor. The driving ability of brain tumor patients is not explicitly regulated in Germany. Of the interviewed experts 72% judged the guidelines to be precise enough and 44% did not want to deprive the patients of their driving ability without a first seizure, independent of the individual risk., Discussion: The available studies are methodologically insufficient and show that a further evaluation is necessary to assess the driving ability. Possible restrictions of the driving ability in patients with a high risk of seizures in the course of the disease have to take into account the balance between individual rights and the interests of the general public.

Epilepsies after stroke represent 20% of all adult-onset epilepsies and exhibit special characteristics with respect to diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Patients are frequently amnestic for their seizures the signs of which can be very subtle. Postictal pareses and confusional states can last for days, which further complicate diagnosis. Single seizures after stroke were reported in 2% to 10% of cases, and community-based studies found epilepsies in 3% to 4% of stroke patients. Analyses of subgroups identified epilepsy risks of 3% after ischemic infarction, 6% to 10% after intracerebral hemorrhage, and 9% after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Status epilepticus developed in less than 1% of stroke patients. Besides etiology, further risk factors for epilepsy comprise: remote seizures (latency >2 weeks, risk of recurrence >50%) more than early seizures (latency <2 weeks, risk of recurrence <50%), extent of stroke, cortical involvement, and degree of neurological deficit. The first appearance of seizures in patients older than 60 years represents a risk factor for future stroke with a hazard ratio of 2.89.There is currently no sufficient evidence for starting AED treatment before seizures occur. The benefit is still unclear of starting AED after a single early post-stroke seizure. Most authors recommend AED treatment after the second seizure but also after a first remote seizure because of the high risk of seizure recurrence in these situations. Possible pharmacokinetic interactions should be considered when choosing AED. Especially the first-generation AED carry the potential to interact with comedication, which is usually seen in stroke patients receiving substances such warfarin and salicylates. Only very few studies investigate specific AED exclusively in stroke patients. Lamotrigine and gabapentin have been successfully tested in these patients.

This report reviews the lateralising and localising signs of epileptic seizures in respect to the differential diagnosis of epilepsy. The lateralising value of epileptic signs and symptoms can frequently be derived from the neuroanatomy. Focal clonic, focal tonic, and versive seizures as well as ictal unilateral dystonia are associated with a seizure onset zone in the contralateral hemisphere. Postictal nose wiping is performed with the hand ipsilateral to the epileptogenic zone. Similarly, unilateral blinking points to an ipsilateral seizure onset. Automatisms with preserved consciousness, ictal speech, and vomiting correlate to an epileptogenic zone in the non-dominant hemisphere, while postictal dysphasia is produced by seizures arising from the dominant hemisphere. Lateralising and localising signs and symptoms of epileptic seizures are of great help in the differential diagnosis of epilepsy from the first diagnosis of epileptic events to presurgical video-EEG monitoring.