Search

Improved survival in testicular cancer has been accompanied by concern about long-term side effects of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Secondary malignant neoplasia represents one of the worst possible long-term complications, leading to death in patients cured of their primary malignancy. Patients with testicular germ cell tumors appear to have a 2-fold increased risk of developing any second cancer 25-30 years after the diagnosis, resulting in a cumulative incidence of 16-23% at that time. The risk for secondary solid tumors can be mainly attributed to radiotherapy. There is strong evidence of an increasing risk for secondary solid tumors with time since treatment. Tumor-specific analysis of the risk for second cancers revealed statistically significant excesses for stomach, pancreas, bladder, rectum, prostate, and kidney cancer, as well as for cancer of the thyroid, melanoma, sarcomas, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. No significantly elevated risk for secondary solid tumors was observed after treatment with chemotherapy alone. The risk of secondary leukemia was associated with both radiotherapy and in particular with chemotherapy. In recent clinical surveys of patients with testicular cancer, estimates of the risk of leukemia after chemotherapy have ranged from 10- to 300-fold. An elevated risk was observed within the first two decades after diagnosis, later the risk was as expected in the normal population. Etoposide seems to be leukemogenic, especially at cumulative doses higher than 2 g/m2, although the effects of dose and schedule as well as the effects of other cytotoxic agents and radiotherapy remain to be finally clarified. Based on currently available data in patients with testicular cancer, it can be concluded that a significant elevated risk for the development of secondary leukemia exits after chemotherapy. However this risk does by far not outweigh the therapeutic benefit of etoposid-based therapy in patients with germ cell tumors. Secondary Raynaud's phenomenon is the main late vascular toxicity affecting about one third of patients after curative chemotherapy for testicular cancer. Hypertension will occur in one fifths of the patients. The incidence of vascular toxicity appears to be lower following PEB-therapy compared to PVB-therapy and major vascular events seem to be rare. Other frequent symptomatic toxicities are ototoxicity and peripheral neuropathy. A major risk factor for the development of toxicity is the cumulative dose of cisplatin given. Alterations of gonadotropin levels and Leydig cell insufficiency persist in more than half of young patients cured from testicular cancer by cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Approximately one fourth of patients have low serum magnesium or phosphat levels, or elevated creatinine levels. These toxicities seldomly result in clinical symptoms. We conclude that 3-4 courses with bleomycin, cisplatin and etoposide in testicular cancer patients will only rarely lead to symptomatic impairment of organ functions and a decrease of quality of life. Germ cell cancers have served as a valuable model for the development of new treatment strategies contributing largely to defining the role of cisplatinum, etoposide and recently ifosfamide in medical oncology. However, germ cell cancer may also be a useful model for investigating the long term side effects of the oncological therapies. Thus, germ cell cancer is not only a "model for a curable neoplasm" (L.H. Einhorn) but can also be seen as a "model for the study of late sequelae of modern oncological therapies". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the ability of [(18)F]FDG-PET, CT/MRI and serum tumor marker (TM) for the early prediction of response in patients with metastatic germ cell tumors (GCT) undergoing salvage high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CTX)., Materials and Methods: Before commencement of HD-CTX, 19 patients with metastases from GCT were evaluated with [(18)F]FDG-PET, CT or MRI and TM after 2-3 cycles of induction chemotherapy and the results compared with those of the baseline examinations. PET was analyzed visually and quantitatively by calculating the standard uptake value (SUV). CT or MRI was evaluated for changes in tumor size (progressive disease/stable disease PD/SD = viable lesion; partial remission/complete remission PR/CR = nonviable lesion), density or signal intensity, homogeneity and contrast enhancement. For the prognosis, the worse case, i.e., the most vital lesion detected in a patient, was considered. The reference standard was the result of the histology after resection of any residual masses (N = 10) and/or the clinical-radiological follow-up for at least 6 months after completion of the treatment (N = 9)., Results: Six of nineteen patients (32 %) remained progression-free for over 6 months following treatment, whereas 13 (68 %) progressed. The outcome of HD-CTX was correctly predicted by PET, CT and TM in 89 %, 67 % and 88 %, respectively. In 5 of 6 patients with successful HD-CTX, PET was negative (mean SUV = 1.8), with CT or MRI showing a partial regression of the tumor in 4 of 5 patients. Of the 13 patients not cured by HD-CTX, the PET data were positive in all (mean SUV = 2.7), and the CT/MRI results were true positive (PD or SD) in 8 and false negative (PR) in 5 patients. The combined assessment of CT and TM corrected 3 false negative prognoses and 1 false positive CT prognosis. Two patients with unfavorable outcome despite a favorable response by CT and TM criteria were exclusively identified by PET. The resultant sensitivities and specificities for the prediction of therapy response are as follows: PET 100% and 67%; CT/MRI 62% and 80%; TM 83% and 100%; CT+TM 85% and 83%., Conclusion: FDG-PET has a high prognostic value for predicting the response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic GCT early in the course of treatment and may improve patient selection for subsequent HD-CTX protocols. Especially in patients with response to induction chemotherapy according to CT or TM evaluation, PET offers additional information to detect patients with an overall unfavorable outcome.

Purpose: As a result of the observation that the potential biological aggressiveness of even early stage renal cell cancer (RCC) strongly correlates with tumor size, the 5th edition of the TNM system (1997), which classifies all renal tumors up to a maximum diameter of 7 cm as T1, was modified in the current classification to distinguish T1a and T1b tumors based on a cut-off of 4 cm. Only a few larger investigations supporting this cut-off are available in the literature and these are based on univariate statistical analysis. To determine whether this cut-off best reflects the correlation between aggressive potential and tumor size and thus differentiates patients at low or high risk of progression, this investigation was performed using both univariate and multivariate statistical analysis., Materials and Methods: Between 1981 and 2000, a total of 652 patients underwent tumor nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Of these, the 243 patients with local RCC not extending beyond the renal capsule were subjected to univariate (log rank test) and multivariate (Cox regression model) statistical analysis., Results: It became evident that, while during univariate analysis the prognostic calue of a cut-off size of 4 cm was confirmed, multivariate analysis identified the highest relative risk of cause-specific death (2.93) in those patients with tumors larger than 5 cm maximum diameter., Conclusions: The 5 cm cut-off thus appears to best determine the clinical prognosis for patients undergoing tumor nephrectomy for early stage renal call cancer. Taking this into consideration, the present study clearly demonstrates the reed for a multivariate statistical approach when the current modification of the TNM classification system is critically reevaluated.

More than 50% of patients with pancreatic or biliary tract cancer are diagnosed in advanced and curatively unresectable tumor stages. To date, chemotherapeutic treatment yielded disappointing results in these patients with 5-year survival rates of 0-15%, leading to therapeutic nihilism in many patients. However, with the availability of new cytostatic agents as well as the introduction of the novel clinical endpoint "clinical benefit response" at least some improvements may be possible in patients with pancreatic cancer. Several randomized studies have shown a clinical and survival benefit for patients treated with chemotherapy as compared to patients treated with best supportive care alone. Gemcitabine was the first agent, which was investigated for its potential to improve symptoms as well as overall well being. A significant clinical benefit response can be achieved in up to 40% of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine is currently also investigated in combination chemotherapy regimens. First results with combination chemotherapy regimens such as cisplatin/gemcitabine have shown promising results. In addition, taxanes such as docetaxel also appear to have a certain activity in patients with pancreatic cancer. In contrast, topoisomerase I-inhibiting drugs seems to have no efficacy in the treatment of this disease. New and experimental therapeutic options such as angiogenesis-inhibition, matrixmetalloproteinase-inhibition or the use of monoclonal antibodies are currently evaluated within clinical studies. Only a few small studies reporting about chemotherapy in patients with biliary tract cancer have been published. This is mainly due to the rarity of this tumor entity, but also due to the rapid onset of symptoms such as hyperbilirubinemia, which will limit the number of potentially available drugs. 5-FU is the most widely investigated drug inducing remissions in 10-15% of patients. It is unclear whether new agents such as gemcitabine or the taxanes will led to an improvement of the prognosis of these patients. Although the recent advances in the treatment with these new therapeutic options are far from being satisfactory, it appears that a first small step ahead has been made the treatment of these diseases.

Improved survival in testicular cancer has been accompanied by concern about long-term side effects of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Secondary malignant neoplasia represents one of the worst possible long-term complications, leading to death in patients cured of their primary malignancy. Patients with testicular germ cell tumors appear to have a 2-fold increased risk of developing any second cancer 25-30 years after the diagnosis, resulting in a cumulative incidence of 16-23% at that time. The risk for secondary solid tumors can be mainly attributed to radiotherapy. There is strong evidence of an increasing risk for secondary solid tumors with time since treatment. Tumor-specific analysis of the risk for second cancers revealed statistically significant excesses for stomach, pancreas, bladder, rectum, prostate, and kidney cancer, as well as for cancer of the thyroid, melanoma, sarcomas, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. No significantly elevated risk for secondary solid tumors was observed after treatment with chemotherapy alone. The risk of secondary leukemia was associated with both radiotherapy and in particular with chemotherapy. In recent clinical surveys of patients with testicular cancer, estimates of the risk of leukemia after chemotherapy have ranged from 10- to 300-fold. An elevated risk was observed within the first two decades after diagnosis, later the risk was as expected in the normal population. Etoposide seems to be leukemogenic, especially at cumulative doses higher than 2 g/m2, although the effects of dose and schedule as well as the effects of other cytotoxic agents and radiotherapy remain to be finally clarified. Based on currently available data in patients with testicular cancer, it can be concluded that a significant elevated risk for the development of secondary leukemia exits after chemotherapy. However this risk does by far not outweigh the therapeutic benefit of etoposid-based therapy in patients with germ cell tumors. Secondary Raynaud's phenomenon is the main late vascular toxicity affecting about one third of patients after curative chemotherapy for testicular cancer. Hypertension will occur in one fifths of the patients. The incidence of vascular toxicity appears to be lower following PEB-therapy compared to PVB-therapy and major vascular events seem to be rare. Other frequent symptomatic toxicities are ototoxicity and peripheral neuropathy. A major risk factor for the development of toxicity is the cumulative dose of cisplatin given. Alterations of gonadotropin levels and Leydig cell insufficiency persist in more than half of young patients cured from testicular cancer by cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Approximately one fourth of patients have low serum magnesium or phosphat levels, or elevated creatinine levels. These toxicities seldomly result in clinical symptoms. We conclude that 3-4 courses with bleomycin, cisplatin and etoposide in testicular cancer patients will only rarely lead to symptomatic impairment of organ functions and a decrease of quality of life. Germ cell cancers have served as a valuable model for the development of new treatment strategies contributing largely to defining the role of cisplatinum, etoposide and recently ifosfamide in medical oncology. However, germ cell cancer may also be a useful model for investigating the long term side effects of the oncological therapies. Thus, germ cell cancer is not only a "model for a curable neoplasm" (L.H. Einhorn) but can also be seen as a "model for the study of late sequelae of modern oncological therapies".