Search

Copyright of Colo-Proctology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after sphincter preserving anterior rectal resection in patients with rectal cancer is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The impact of AL on long-term survival has, however, still not been sufficiently investigated and is currently the subject of controversial discussion. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of AL on long-term survival in patients with Union of International Cancer Control (UICC) 0-III stage mid-to-low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter preserving rectal resection. Material and methods: A total of 108 patients with a mid-to-low rectal cancer (UICC stage 0-III) who underwent sphincter preserving surgery between January 2003 and October 2010 were identified within the institutional prospective colorectal cancer database. The impact of AL on 5-year overall (OS), cancer specific (CSS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) was investigated. Results: The overall leakage rate was 17.6 % (grade A 4.6 %, grade B 4.6 % and grade C 8.3 %). After a median follow-up of 70 months (range 24-123 months), patients with an anastomotic leakage had a significantly decreased 5-year OS (63.6 % versus 87.8 %, p = 0.02), CSS (72.2 % versus 93.5 %, p = 0.02) and RFS rate (61.1 % versus 84.2 %, p = 0.01). In univariable Cox regression analysis AL was associated with an unfavorable OS (hazard ratio HR 3.05, 95 % CI: 1.11-8.39, p = 0.03), CSS (HR 4.21, 95 % CI: 1.13-15.70, p = 0.03) and RFS (HR 3.02, 95 % CI: 1.20-7.58, p = 0.02). Conclusion: In the study cohort anastomotic leakage after sphincter preserving anterior resection in patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer was associated with a significantly unfavorable impact on overall and oncological survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Colo-Proctology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Langenbecks Archiv fuer Chirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: The occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after sphincter preserving anterior rectal resection in patients with rectal cancer is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The impact of AL on long-term survival has, however, still not been sufficiently investigated and is currently the subject of controversial discussion., Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of AL on long-term survival in patients with Union of International Cancer Control (UICC) (y)0-III stage mid-to-low rectal cancer who underwent sphincter preserving rectal resection., Material and Methods: A total of 108 patients with a mid-to-low rectal cancer (UICC stage (y)0-III) who underwent sphincter preserving surgery between January 2003 and October 2010 were identified within the institutional prospective colorectal cancer database. The impact of AL on 5-year overall (OS), cancer specific (CSS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) was investigated., Results: The overall leakage rate was 17.6 % (grade A 4.6 %, grade B 4.6 % and grade C 8.3 %). After a median follow-up of 70 months (range 24-123 months), patients with an anastomotic leakage had a significantly decreased 5-year OS (63.6 % versus 87.8 %, p = 0.02), CSS (72.2 % versus 93.5 %, p = 0.02) and RFS rate (61.1 % versus 84.2 %, p = 0.01). In univariable Cox regression analysis AL was associated with an unfavorable OS (hazard ratio HR 3.05, 95 % CI: 1.11-8.39, p = 0.03), CSS (HR 4.21, 95 % CI: 1.13-15.70, p = 0.03) and RFS (HR 3.02, 95 % CI: 1.20-7.58, p = 0.02)., Conclusion: In the study cohort anastomotic leakage after sphincter preserving anterior resection in patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer was associated with a significantly unfavorable impact on overall and oncological survival.

Copyright of Langenbecks Archiv fuer Chirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Langenbecks Archiv fuer Chirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Langenbecks Archiv fuer Chirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)