Search

Copyright of Anaesthesist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Anaesthesist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (AAGA) is a rare but severe complication. The reported incidence of AAGA may depend on the assessment of intraoperative awareness with explicit recall and there are substantial variations between subspecialties and groups of patients. The majority of prospective studies using structured interviews reported an incidence of AAGA at 0.1-0.2% during general anaesthesia, however, higher values were observed in paediatric (0.2-1.2%) and obstetric patients (0.47%). Risk factors that predispose to AAGA are patient conditions, ASA status, female gender, patient age, history of AAGA, surgical procedure, anaesthetic drug type, muscle relaxation, dosages of hypnotic or analgesic drugs, monitoring and malfunction of anaesthesia systems. Preventive strategies include careful assessment of risk factors, avoidance of underdosages of hypnotics and analgetics during general anaesthesia and monitoring of depth of anaesthesia in risk patients. The health-related consequences can be serious and psychopharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions are indicated in patients who have experienced AAGA., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Valvular heart disease is a common comorbidity in patients with impaired renal function, especially in those with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis. Sclerosis and calcification of the heart valves and the valve ring are particularly relevant in the etiology of the diseases. These typically occur at the aortic and mitral valves and can lead to both insufficiency and stenosis of the affected valve. In the current guidelines of the European Society for Cardiology published in 2017, surgical treatment remains the standard of care for most forms of severe valvular heart disease; however, the presence of chronic kidney disease impairs clinical outcomes and is associated with higher mortality rates when compared to patients with preserved renal function. Catheter-based treatment options have emerged as an effective and safe alternative for patients >75 years and/or with increased surgical risk. Consequently, in patients with appropriate anatomy and elevated risk, interventional treatment options should also be discussed in the heart team.

Background: Trauma care personnel are at risk of occupational exposure to blood-borne pathogens. Little is known regarding compliance with standard precautions or occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among multiple trauma care personnel in Germany., Aim: Compliance rates of multiple trauma care personnel in applying standard precautions, knowledge about transmission risks of blood-borne pathogens, perceived risks of acquiring hepatitis B, hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the personal attitude towards testing of the index patient for blood-borne pathogens after a needlestick injury were evaluated., Material and Methods: In the context of an advanced multiple trauma training an anonymous questionnaire was administered to the participants., Results: Almost half of the interviewees had sustained a needlestick injury within the last 12 months. Approximately three quarters of the participants were concerned about the risk of HIV and hepatitis. Trauma care personnel had insufficient knowledge of the risk of blood-borne pathogens, overestimated the risk of hepatitis C infection and underused standard precautionary measures. Although there was excellent compliance for using gloves, there was poor compliance in using double gloves (26.4 %), eye protectors (19.7 %) and face masks (15.8 %). The overwhelming majority of multiple trauma care personnel believed it is appropriate to test an index patient for blood-borne pathogens following a needlestick injury., Conclusion: The process of treatment in prehospital settings is less predictable than in other settings in which invasive procedures are performed. Periodic training and awareness programs for trauma care personnel are required to increase the knowledge of occupational infections and the compliance with standard precautions. The legal and ethical aspects of testing an index patient for blood-borne pathogens after a needlestick injury of a healthcare worker have to be clarified in Germany.

Stroke is a serious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention and atrial fibrillation ablation procedures and patients have a high likelihood of persistent neurological deficits. Although formal criteria speak against intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis due to pre-existing antithrombotic and anticoagulation therapy, the conditions for recanalizing therapy are optimal due to the occurrence of vessel occlusion in the catheter suite or the chest pain unit. Brain imaging and an interdisciplinary approach are mandatory. In cases of intracerebral vessel occlusion intra-arterial thrombolysis possibly in combination with mechanical clot fragmentation is the first choice therapy. The management of the patient is always an individual therapeutic decision based on stroke severity, the pretreatment with antithrombotic and anticoagulation drugs, the availability of a neuro-interventionalist and the qualification of the local team.

Acute renal failure is a common complication in intensive care medicine. While the incidence of acute renal failure increases, mortality still remains at a high level. In Europe continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has become the standard treatment for acute renal failure. Continuous renal replacement therapy has the advantage of achieving a more stable haemodynamic situation and an easier volume management compared to intermittent haemodialysis (IHD). Until now there has been no evidence to suggest that either classical IHD or CRRT is superior in reducing mortality. Using CRRT in patients with acute renal failure, an ultrafiltration rate adjusted to the patient's bodyweight at 35 ml/kg x h is recommended. A new approach in renal replacement therapy is the slow extended daily dialysis (SLEDD), which combines the advantages of CRRT and IHD. First results are promising, but further investigations are needed to show whether outcome can be improved. A final evidence-based recommendation on the dosing of CRRT or a definitive answer to the question whether daily IHD is better than CRRT, can probably only be possible after two running multicentre studies, the VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network (ATN) study and the Augmented Versus Normal Renal Replacement Therapy in Severe Acute Renal Failure Study (ANZICS 2005) Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Group.

This article reviews advances in cardiovascular medicine published last year. The following issues are reported in detail: (1) risk factors and lifestyle, (2) computed tomography in coronary artery disease, (3) revascularization in cardiogenic shock, (4) long-term anticoagulation in venous thrombosis, (5) anemia in heart failure, (6) optimism and cardiovascular death, (7) mortality after drug-eluting stents, (8) diabetes and cardiovascular disease, (9) new guidelines atrial fibrillation, (10) dopamine agonists and cardiac valve regurgitation, (11) beta-blockers and hypertension, (12) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and aortic rupture, (13) statin therapy, (14) adherence to pharmacotherapy.

The studies presented here investigated the obtainable flows of different contrast media (Iopromide 370 mg iodine/ml, ZK 119 095 370 mg iodine/ml, ZK 139 129 370 mg iodine/ml, Iopamidol 370 mg iodine/ml, Iopromide 300 mg iodine/ml, ZK 119 095 300 mg iodine/ml, ZK 139 129 300 mg iodine/ml, Iopamidol 300 mg iodine/ml, aqua dest.) in 4.1 Charrière coronary catheters. The measurements of the flow achieved by a standardised power of 100 N show that the highest values are reached with the substance ZK 119 095 (both for 300 mg iodine/ml and 370 mg iodine/ml). On comparison of the catheter types there are no differences in the delivery rate. The x-ray contrast-media, however, are significantly different: the lowest iodine delivery rate is found for iopromide 370 with 384.5 mg iodine/s; the highest rate for the test substance ZK 119 095 with 648.9 mg iodine/s. Although contrast media with low viscosity contain considerably less iodine/ml it is possible to achieve an iodine density in coronary vessels by about 86% higher than that achieved by contrast media with 370 mg iodine/ml. Therefore, the possibility to choose a viscosity-adapted x-ray contrast-medium allows the use of very thin cardiac catheter systems without leading to a worsening of picture quality.

In the present study we investigated the contrast medium flow in 8 different types of left heart catheter having two different diameters (each n = 5). Using a 10 ml syringe and the contrast medium Ultravist 370, we calculated a mean value of 94.24 N + 16.01 for the maximum manual injection force in 18 test subjects. For the sake of simplicity, the figure of 100 N was defined as standardized manual force (which is within the standard deviation). If the maximally admissible static pressure of 82.5 bar is not to be exceeded, flow rates of not more than 16-17 ml/s are possible with 5.2 Fr. catheters, and 21-23 ml/s and 1.46 ml/s for 5.2 Fr. catheters, and between 1.99 ml/s and 2.17 ml/s for 6 Fr. catheters. Thus, a 50% higher flow can be achieved with 6 Fr. catheters as compared with 5.2 Fr. catheters at the same injection force. The iodine delivery rates are between 506 mg iodine/s and 539 mg iodine/s for 5.2 Fr. catheters, and between 738 mg iodine/s and 804 mg iodine/s for 6 Fr. catheters. The figures for the jet stream.

In the present study, the torsional moments of 8 different types of catheter having two different calibres (n = 5 in each case) were investigated. The catheters were made of linear polyurethane (Cordis, Netherlands). The transmitted torsional moments of the 5.2 Fr. catheters positioned in a straight line were 1.48 +/- 0.09 Ncm (VK = 6%), positioned in a 90 degree curve 1.39 +/- 0.11 Ncm (VK = 8%). The corresponding figures for the 6 Fr. catheters were 2.43 +/- 0.20 Ncm (VK = 8%) and 2.26 +/- 0.20 Ncm (VK = 9%). The highly stable transmission behaviour in particular of the 5 Fr. catheters--with a variation coefficient of the torsional moments of 6%--is due mainly to the accurate manufacture of the catheters, and the material chosen. The study is a first step towards achieving systematic quality control of the materials used for diagnosis and therapy.