Search

Copyright of Der Diabetologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Patients with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk for developing symptoms of heart failure. These can be accompanied by a reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (HFREF, systolic heart failure) or by a preserved function (HFPEF, diastolic heart failure). The pathophysiology of both entities is distinct and involves impairment of myocardial metabolism and coronary circulation alike. Although diabetes and heart failure often coincide, the management of these patients particularly with respect to the specific benefits or possible hazards of antidiabetic treatment is vague. Therefore, from a pathophysiological as well as clinical viewpoint, 1) diabetic patients with symptoms of heart failure have to be differentiated regarding systolic as well as diastolic left ventricular function by echocardiography and tissue doppler imaging. 2) Heart failure in diabetic patients needs similar attention due to a prognosis and interactions. 3) Optimized blood glucose lowering in combination with improvement of other cardiovascular risk factors is evident for HFREF and is assumed to be beneficial for HFPEF. 4) Antidiabetic medication has to be specifically adapted for both entities. As prospective, controlled studies are scarce, future interventional studies should specifically focus on clinical outcome in diabetic patients with different entities of heart failure., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

We report on a 46 year old patient with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who presented to our emergency room. Diagnostic evaluation showed elevated free peripheral thyroid hormone levels and thyrotropine (TSH) hormone within normal limits. Ultrasound of the thyroid was normal, and thyroid autoantibodies were found in the normal range. There was a positive family history for thyroid dysfunction. TSH-producing adenoma (TSHoma) of the pituitary gland - the main differential diagnosis - was excluded by cranial MRI and laboratory tests. Familial thyroid hormone resistance (Refetoff syndrome) was suspected and could be confirmed by detection of a pathogenic mutation within the beta-thyroidhormone receptor gene. After spontaneous conversion to sinusrhythm the patient was treated with a beta(1)-selective betareceptor blocker. Up to now, no specific treatment is available to correct the defective beta-thyroidhormone receptor.

Background: Patients with liver cirrhosis develop frequently disturbances of glucose metabolism e. g. glucose intolerance or hepatogenous diabetes which are caused by the hepatocellular functional loss and insulin resistance due to chronic liver disease., Discussion: Until now there are no recommendations comparable to guidelines on the diagnosis of and therapy for hepatogenic diabetes. Regarding basic treatment a sufficient daily energy and protein supply should be guaranteed since the majority of patients with liver cirrhosis are malnourished. The risk of hypoglycaemia must be considered carefully under pharmacological treatment of hepatogenous diabetes. Biguanide and PPAR gamma agonists are contraindicated due to side effects in liver cirrhosis. Suitable oral antidiabetics are glinides and short-acting sulfonylureas. If a sufficient diabetes adjustment does not succeed by oral antidiabetics a prandial insulin therapy using short-acting insulins or rapid-acting insulin analogues should be applied., Conclusion: Optimisation of diabetic metabolic conditions is not only important to avoid typical diabetic late complications but also cirrhosis-associated complications, e. g., gastrointestinal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy or the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus diastolic dysfunction is a frequent manifestation of myocardial disease with poor prognosis. The hypothesis that better glycemic control results in improved myocardial function was tested using tissue Doppler., Methods: During a short-term (3 weeks) and a long-term (52 weeks) study, metabolic control and myocardial function were evaluated in 33 and 50 patients, respectively, with type 2 diabetes. Systolic (Vs) and diastolic (Ve) myocardial velocity were assessed by tissue Doppler. In the short-term study, antidiabetic therapy was intensified in 25 patients (Int3) and compared to those eight individuals with unchanged therapy (Con3), similarly to the long-term study with Int52 (n = 39) and Con52 (n = 11)., Results: In Int3, fasting serum glucose was reduced by 69+/-47 mg/dl (p < 0.01) compared to baseline and was associated with an increase of Ve from 8.0 +/- 1.6 to 8.8 +/- 1.6 cm/s (p < 0.01) and Vs from 6.2 +/- 1.1 to 6.6 +/- 1.3 cm/s, p < 0.04. In Con3, serum glucose and myocardial velocities were unchanged. In Int52, fasting serum glucose was reduced by 20 +/- 43 mg/dl (p < 0.017) compared to baseline and was associated with an increase of Ve from 7.6 +/- 1.3 to 8.3 +/- 1.7 cm/s (p < 0.002) and a similar trend in Vs (p < 0.07). In Con52, serum glucose and myocardial velocities remained unchanged. Evaluating pooled data, the changes of diastolic myocardial velocity correlated significantly with the changes of serum glucose (r = 0.49, p < 0.004 short- and r = 0.45; p < 0.002 long-term study, respectively)., Conclusion: In patients with type 2 diabetes subclinical diastolic myocardial dysfunction, measured as diastolic myocardial velocity by tissue Doppler, improves with better glycemic control.

Aim of Study: The aim of the study was to find to find out which factors are able to predict the disease-specific knowledge of in-patient diabetic patients and to characterize this group of patients., Methods: The disease-specific knowledge of diabetic patients of a Hospital in Munich, Germany (department of diabetology) was tested using a general questionnaire and a specific diabetes knowledge test. All data manipulation and statistical calculations were conducted with the statistical software package SAS (version 9.1)., Results: On average type-1-diabetics achieved 73% of the possible points in the knowledge test, type-2-diabetics achieved 68% of total points. In bivariate analyses, using logistic regression, existence of diabetes related complications was a significant predictor of poor knowledge (OR = 4.36; 95%-KI: 1.38-13.77) in type-1-diabetics. Other factors, e. g. lack of diabetes education were associated with low test results but reached no statistical significance (OR = 6.13; 95%-KI: 0.67-56.42). In multivariate logistic regression (female) gender was a significant risk factor for low test results (OR = 7.66; 95%-KI: 1.18-49.8). In type-2-diabetics lack of diabetes education (OR = 3.86; 95%-KI: 1.51-9.84), low self-assessment of information about diabetes (OR = 3.90; 95%-KI: 1.36-11.21) and lack of knowledge about diabetes diet (OR = 4.06; 95%-KI: 1.60-10.28) were predictors of poor test results. The existence of diabetes related complications was associated with poor test results but showed no statistical significance in multivariate analysis (OR = 2.99; 95%-KI: 0.85-10.43)., Conclusions: There is a group of diabetic inward-patients that is less informed about diabetes and shows knowledge deficits in testing. These patients often lack diabetes education and show an unfavourable course of the disease, already having diabetes related complications. Type-2-diabetes patients who feel that they have poor information about their disease actually achieve lower results in knowledge testing. Efforts to assure diabetes education for these patients are essentially necessary.

At the time of the diagnosis insulin resistance is present in the majority of type 2 diabetics. Only in those type 2 diabetics who are of normal weight at diagnosis must a disturbance of insulin secretion be assumed. These pathophysiological facts, discovered in recent years, mandate a differentiated treatment of type 2 diabetics. The primary aim must be the treatment of the insulin resistance. Insulinotropic drugs are indicated only during the further course of the disease. The use of glitazones makes possible a largely causal treatment of insulin resistance. Over the long term better glycemic control is achieved with glitazones rather than sulfonylureas. As a secondary effect, the insulin-producing beta cells are protected, and such cardiovascular risk factors as diabetic dyslipoproteinemia, hypertension or microalbuminuria are favorably influenced.

Patients with chronic endocrinological diseases, whether congenital or manifesting in childhood, have to date been the domain of the pediatric clinic long beyond puberty into adulthood. The reason for this is the complete lack of adequate communication between pediatricians and internists specialized in endocrinology. However, intensive and constant cooperation between the two specialties is a prerequisite for the successful transition of adolescent to adult patients. The transition clinic is of central importance for the appropriate management and a stable status of the patient. Nevertheless, only very few university centers so far established such a clinic. Only by overcoming sectoral boundaries, and the creation of a network structure between university policlinic, non-university outpatient department, specialty practice and the family doctor can the intensity and quality of management be improved. The requirement fortransition clinics urgently needs to be met, also in the form of model projects.