Search

Copyright of Der Gastroenterologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) gastritis and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) intake are the most important risk factors for peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and ulcer bleeding. H. pylori infection was shown to increase the risk of ulcer bleeding in patients with PUD who are taking NSAID, aspirin, or another antiplatelet drug. H. pylori-positive patients on combined platelet aggregation inhibition are at the highest risk of bleeding. Evidence-based interdisciplinary treatment recommendations for the safe use of NSAID have been released. For patients with a moderate risk of PUD, the combination of NSAID and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or a monotherapy with a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor is recommended, whereas patients with a high risk of bleeding should receive a combination of a selective COX-2 inhibitor and a PPI. According to a recent randomized trial, hemodynamically stable patients with signs of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and an increased risk of death (Glasgow-Blatchford Score ≥ 12) undergoing endoscopy 6-24 after consultation do not have any disadvantage in terms of 30-day mortality compared to patients receiving endoscopy within 6 hours. After successful endoscopic hemostasis, additional prophylactic angiographic embolization does not reduce the risk of recurrent bleeding. Successful H. pylori eradication reduces the risk of developing gastric cancer (GC) in first-degree relatives of patients with GC by 73 %. In patients with successful endoscopic treatment of early GC, H. pylori testing with subsequent eradication also halves the rate of metachronous GC. Clarithromycin-based triple therapy for H. pylori eradication shows a decreasing effectiveness due to increasing antibiotic resistance, especially against macrolides. Accordingly, bismuth-containing quadruple therapy is widely recommended as the standard empiric first-line therapy., Competing Interests: CS gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.MV erklärt, dass er innerhalb der vergangenen 3 Jahre in Beratungsgremien von Ipsen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, Bayer Vital, BMS, MSD, Eisai und Amgen tätig war; Forschungsunterstützung von Sirtex erhalten hat sowieVortragshonorare von Nordic Pharma, Merck Serono, Novartis, Bayer Vital, Lilly und Sirtex erhalten hat., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammation of the gastric corpus/fundus mucosa leading to progressive atrophy of the oxyntic gastric glands (AOM) and their consecutive loss of function. Possible clinical consequences of AIG include iron deficiency anemia, pernicious anemia, gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNET), and gastric adenocarcinoma. This article provides a review of interdisciplinary aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of AIG., Competing Interests: MV erklärt, dass er innerhalb der vergangenen 3 Jahre in Beratungsgremien von Ipsen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, Bayer Vital, BMS, MSD, Eisai, und Amgen tätig war/Forschungsunterstützung von Sirtex erhalten hat/Vortragshonorare von Nordic Pharma, Merck Serono, Novartis, Bayer Vital, Lilly, und Sirtex erhalten hat.SS und DJ erklären, dass keine Interessenkonflikte bestehen., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In hepatic resections, there has been a high quality demand. The aim of this systematic clinical, prospective, unblinded unicenter observational study with two arms in an unselected patient cohort was to investigate whether hemostat device can significantly improve outcome in resective liver surgery, in particular, in high risk patients., Methods: All consecutive patients (mean age, 60.5 [range, 17 - 96] years) who underwent hepatic resection (ntotal = 770) were prospectively documented in a computer-based registry at a university hospital (tertiary center) over a time period of 10 years and retrospectively evaluated specifically with regard to the use (-/+; in daily practice and intraoperative decision-making) of hemostat device (Tissucol(®), n = 59/Tachocomb(®), n = 202/combination, n = 55) indicated (among others) by drainage volume, inflammatory parameters and rate of specific complications (nvalidated = 541 [100 %])., Results: Most frequently, (a-)/typical segmental resections were used: n = 192/90 (3-segment resection, only n = 38). 1) For the assignment of patients to the two different groups (-/+ hemostat device), weight loss and type of resection were found as significant factors (trend: ASA, cirrhosis), for the amount of drainage volume, ASA, sex, Karnofsky Performance Scale and also type of resections using independent distributed statistical tests (such as χ(2), U test [Mann/Whitney]; H test [Kruskal-Willis]; correlation coefficient by Spearman) - no impact: smoking, diabetes, BMI, ethanol. 2) Not taking into account these parameters, the use of hemostat device was characterized by an increased drainage volume (negative control < Tissucol = Tachocomb < combination). 3) Using multifactorial analysis of variance, it was found even under correction by the factors with significant impact elucidated in the single test that the application of hemostat device onto the hepatic resection area resulted unexpectedly rather in an increase than a decrease of the drainage volume but 4) under accompanying more pronounced increase of the white blood cell count (leucocytosis). 5) General and specific complications such as postoperative bleeding, biliary fistula and subhepatic abscess were not further lowered in a significant manner using hemostat device., Conclusion: Adequate surgery in the operative management of hepatic resection area cannot further be improved or optimized using hemostat device. In this context, drainage volume may not be considered a sufficient rather an orienting parameter. However, there is an inflammatory response detectable most likely indicated by a(n un-)specific effusion and increase of white blood cell count, which can be interpreted as a) being characteristic for the problematic group of patients, in whom hemostat device was decided to be useful and was finally used in daily prectice, or b) reactive inflammation to foreign material., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Long-term low-dose aspirin intake leads to a 2 - 4-fold risk of risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The additional intake of clopidogrel further increases the risk of upper GI bleeding (OR 7.4). Because of the potential interaction between proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and clopidogrel that compromises the efficacy of clopidogrel on platelet aggregation, there has been a warning in the product information by health authorities in the US and in Europe who discourage the concomitant use of PPI and clopidogrel. In the present study we performed a selected review of the published literature on the indications for gastric protection with PPI in patients on mono- or dual antiplatelet therapy focussing on the possible interaction between clopidogrel and PPI. In ex vivo analyses of platelet function, a reduced efficacy of clopidogrel was observed in patients on comedication with omeprazole. This was not the case with the comedication of other PPIs. To date, clear evidence is missing to state that comedication with PPI reduces the efficacy of clopidogrel IN VIVO. If both Clopidogrel and PPI need to be prescribed, a split dosage regimen of PPI in the morning and clopidogrel in the evening can be recommended. The short half-life of both medications explains the rationale of this recommendation., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Because of their anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic properties non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most frequently prescribed throughout all medical fields. Both gastrointestinal as well as cerebro- and cardiovascular risk needs to be considered. Especially before starting a long-term medical treatment with NSAIDs the individual gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk of the patient has to be assessed carefully., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart *New York.)