Search

Purpose: This study aims to determine the effect of accountability, transparency, and supervision on the Value for Money concept budget performance at the Gunung Kidul Regency Government. Methodology/Approach: This study uses respondent data derived from the process of distributing questionnaires. Respondents are the Head of Service, Office Treasurer, Head of Finance, and Head of Planning from 24 Regional Apparatus Organizations of Gunung Kidul Regency. The process of data analysis using multiple linear regression with the analytical tool used is SPSS. Findings: The hypothesis proposed in this study is that accountability, transparency, and supervision positively affect the performance of the Value for Money concept budget. The Local governments that apply the principles of accountability, transparency, and good oversight will improve the budget performance process with the Value for Money concept. Practical and Theoretical contribution/Originality: The Regional Government budget can be realized with the principles of economy, effectiveness, and efficiency. The government of Gunung Kidul Regency is expected to increase accountability, transparency, and control to produce good budget performance. Research Limitation: This study has limitations in the level of generalization of research results. This study only measures the influence of the budget with the concept of Value for Money in Gunung Kidul Regency. Each region has different characteristics and conditions, so this research cannot be generalized. Furthermore, research data collection has closed questions so that researchers do not get direct and detailed arguments from respondents as a whole.

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the effect of accountability, transparency, and supervision on value for money-based budget performance in Mojokerto City. Design/methodology/approach: In this study, sampling is carried out using the purposive sampling method. The research sample consists of 51 respondents in regional apparatus organizations in Mojokerto City. The analytical technique used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. Findings: The results show that transparency and supervision have a significant effect on value for money-based budget performance, while accountability has no significant effect on value for money-based budget performance. Paper type: Research paper

This research is intended as an effort to analyze the budget performance of Regional Apparatus Organizations in South Sumatra Province with a value for money concept approach. This study consisted of the dependent variable, namely the performance of the regional apparatus organization budget, while the independent variable consisted of transparency, accountability, and supervision. The data used in this research is the result of distributing questionnaires to selected respondents in 21 Regional Apparatus Organizations. The sample selection technique used purposive sampling, while the data analysis technique used multiple linear regression. The results of the analysis and discussion of hypothesis testing show that partially transparency, accountability, and supervision have a positive and significant effect on-budget performance, including simultaneously also showing a positive and significant effect on-budget performance, but it is necessary to increase budget performance, this shows that the R2 value is 0.446. or 44.6%.

The research purpose is to analyze effect of external pressures, environmental uncertainty, budget quality, locus of control and value for money on budget goals clarity, then to test value for money and locus of control to moderate the relationship between external pressure, environmental uncertainty, quality budget against clarity on budget goals clarity. The research was conducted in Kepulauan Riau Province, used 85 data questionnaires getting from despondences. the first Data processing used classical assumption test, validity and reliability test, and then testing hypothesis test of used t-test and f-test. Empirically, the first to investigate the statistical results of research hypothesis shown that external pressure is a significant positive effect on budget goals clarity; second, environmental uncertainty is a positive significant effect on budget goals clarity; fourth, the budget quality is a significant positive effect budget goals clarity; third, value for money is a positive significant effect on budget goals clarity; fourth, Then the results of the moderation test show that the value for many can weaken the relationship between external pressure and environmental uncertainty on budget goals clarity, but value for many can be to improve relationship between budget quality on budget goals clarity. The final Empirical test to shown that locus of control is not moderating variable between external pressure, environmental uncertainty on budget goals clarity.

The purpose of this research was to determine partially and simultaneously the influence of accountability, public participation and supervision of budget performance with the concept of value for money in the Bengkalis District Financial and Asset Management Agency. This research uses descriptive quantitative analysis method. The sampling technique uses boring sampling method. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear of regression. The results showed that partial accountability, participation and supervision had a positive and significant effect on budget performance with the concept of value for money in the Bengkalis District Financial and Asset Management Agency. While simultaneously accountability, participation and supervision have a positive and significant effect on budget performance with the concept of value for money in the Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency in Bengkalis Regency with a 93.5% influence.

The purpose is to understand and identify concept of performance appraisal using value for money perspective method. This method is carried out with an approach with an interpretive paradigm. The results UPTD Tugu Pahlawan, Balai Pemuda and THR running effectively, efficiently and economically. 3 keys that are applied by UPTD in maintaining the level of Value for Money in their activities, namely collaboration, evaluation and innovation. Good collaboration internal and external organizations will be able to increase effectiveness. Evaluation performance make employees improve and make new innovations to increase revenue and save expenses. Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memahami dan mengidentifikasi konsep penilaian kinerja instansi yang menggunakan metode perspektif value for money. Metode ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif dengan paradigma interpretatif. Hasil menunjukkan organisasi berjalan secara efektif, efisien dan ekonomis. Terdapat 3 kunci yang diterapkan UPTD dalam menjaga tingkat Value for Money kegiatan mereka yaitu kerjasama, evaluasi dan inovasi. Kerjasama yang baik di internal eksternal organisasi akan meningkatkan efektivitas. Evaluasi kinerja membuat pegawai berbenah dan melakukan inovasi baru untuk meningkatkan pendapatan dan menghemat pengeluaran. Dengan melakukan hal tersebut akan diraih good corporate governance.

Abstract. This study aims to examine the effect of accountability, transparancy, and supervision on the budget erformance concept in value for money on regional work unit (SKPD) City of Bandung. The sample used in this tudy was 57 SKPD in City of Bandung. Field research are used to collect the data by using questionnaires as nstruments. Partial Least Square (PLS) approach employed SmartPLS software as data analysis method. Statistical test was utilizied as testing the hyphothesis. The results of the study with inner models showed that accountability, transparency, and supervision significant effect partially on the budget performance concept in value for money on regional work unit (SKPD) City of Bandung. Keywords. accountability; transparency; supervision; value for money. Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh akuntabilitas, transparansi dan pengawasan terhadap kinerja anggaran berkonsep value for money pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (SKPD) Kota Bandung. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah 57 SKPD di Kota Bandung. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah penelitian lapangan dengan menggunakan kuesioner sebagai instrumen. Metode analisis data menggunakan pendekatan Partial Least Square (PLS) dengan bantuan software SmartPLS. Pengujian hipotesis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan uji t-statistic. Hasil penelitian dengan evaluasi inner model menunjukkan secara parsial akuntabilitas, transparansi, dan pengawasan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja anggaran berkonsep value for money pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (SKPD) Kota Bandung. Kata Kunci. akuntabilitas; pengawasan; transparansi; value for money.

This research is to measure the service has been conducted by the government of Batu City using two data analysis, are monetary performance ratio and value for money. The performance of Batu government measured using value for money classified into three those are: economy, efficienty, and effectiveness. The performance of Batu government in economy based on how to realize the fund, the performance of Batu government in efficienty based on the reality of credit (the outcome) of fund is higher than the debet (income) and based on the effectiveness because realization of revenue greater than budget revenue. The performance of Batu government measured using monetary performance ratio classified into five: effetiveness, efficiency, independence, activity and Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR). The performance of Batu government is less effective in realizing the income, however the goverment is efficient enough, thought it has been inreasing in 2009. Batu government has been independence, because it could decrease and keep in depending toward external side (exspecially toward central and province government), Batu government measured using activity ratio, most of the fund is given to local apparatus needs, so the expense of public service toward local expense fund is relatively small, and based on DSCR Batu government is good.

Dalam organisasi sector public termasuk pemerintahan, anggaran merupakan salah satu isu yang sangat penting untuk dikaji. Sejak diterapkannya penganggaran berbasis kinerja, semua pemerintah daerah dituntut untuk mampu menghasilkan kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerahnya secara baik. Dalam penelitian ini penulis ingin menguji kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah setelah menggunakan anggaran berbasis kinerja dengan pendekatan value for money. Dengan melakukan uji beda sebelum menggunakan anggaran berbasis kinerja dengan sesudah menggunakan anggaran berbasis kinerja. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pemerintah daerah lebih ekonomis dan efisien dalam pengelolaan keuangannya setelah menggunakan anggaran berbasis kinerja In public sector organizations which include the government, a budget is one of the very important issues to be studied. Since the performance-based budgeting has been implemented, every local government is required to produce its financial performance. This study has an objective that is to test the performance of local government finance after implementing the performance-based budgeting which uses the approach of value for money. By conducting a prior T- test before and after implementing the performance-based budgeting, this study finds that the local governments are more economical and efficient in managing their finances after having the performance-based budgeting.