Search

Degenerative calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) is a chronic disease whose prevalence has increased over the last decade because of the aging of the general population. CAVS pathogenesis is characterized by complex molecular and cellular mechanisms that promote valve fibro-calcific remodeling. During the first phase, referred to as initiation, the valve undergoes collagen deposition and lipid and immune cell infiltration due to mechanical stress. Subsequently, during the progression phase, the aortic valve undergoes chronic remodeling through osteogenic and myofibroblastic differentiation of interstitial cells and matrix calcification. Knowledge of the mechanisms underlying CAVS development supports the resort to potential therapeutic strategies that interfere with fibro-calcific progression. Currently, no medical therapy has demonstrated the ability to significantly prevent CAVS development or slow its progression. The only treatment available in symptomatic severe stenosis is surgical or percutaneous aortic valve replacement. The aim of this review is to highlight the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in CAVS pathogenesis and progression and to discuss potential pharmacological treatments able to inhibit the main pathophysiological mechanisms of CAVS, including lipid-lowering treatment with lipoprotein(a) as emergent therapeutic target.

The use of social media (SoMe) has spread worldwide among doctors, scientific societies, and researchers. SoMe offer a powerful platform to accelerate or create new contacts, spread scientific news, and increase visibility. A social media promotion strategy for cardiovascular medicine papers seems to be associated with increased online visibility and a higher number of citations. This effect is independent of the type of article and the total number of followers of the authors. Indeed, SoMe are democratic and even non-senior researchers may be popular on Twitter: your title is not as important as what you do on Twitter. Nevertheless, some physicians may be over-celebrated due to their presence on SoMe. This is why a new author index, the K-index, has been proposed. The K-index correlates the citations of a scientist with the number of Twitter followers. Even scientific journals and societies have recognized the importance of SoMe and in the last years they have appeared on SoMe with official accounts. Therefore, besides the classic impact factor, publishers now pay more and more attention to other parameters, such as the Altmetric score, which takes into account the number of citations, but also the number of downloads, mentions on SoMe, newspapers and tv news, web sites, and blogs. The COVID-19 pandemic has boosted the importance of SoMe for scientific content distribution, particularly for congresses. For all these reasons, it is important to understand the pros and cons of SoMe. It is also possible that SoMe will become a new education medium for continuing medical education.