Search

The term "MINOCA" refers to myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries and has been used to define acute myocardial infarction with no angiographic evidence of significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis. Patients with MINOCA represent a rather heterogeneous group of acute coronary syndrome, and this may account for the wide variation in the incidence of MINOCA in different studies. Several pathogenic mechanisms have been suggested to underlie MINOCA, but the condition continues to represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for the cardiologist. Therefore, an adequate diagnostic assessment, carefully characterizing the pathogenic mechanisms, and a selection of more targeted treatments are needed to improve clinical outcomes. In this focused review, we will try to provide answers to the most common questions on the causes, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of MINOCA.

Myocardial revascularization, either percutaneous or surgical, is the cornerstone of chronic and acute ischemic coronary artery disease therapy. Periprocedural myocardial injury and infarction are possible complications of these procedures. Several pathogenetic mechanisms have been proposed in the setting of percutaneous (distal embolism, vasospasm, obstruction of a minor vessel) or surgical revascularization (prolonged ischemic time, early graft failure, arrhythmia or severe hypotension during the procedure). High-sensitivity cardiac troponins have emerged as the recommended biomarkers due to their important prognostic implications. However, data regarding diagnostic criteria, management and prognostic implications of these complications are lacking. The present review aims to provide an overview regarding the possible diagnostic criteria, management and prognostic role of periprocedural myocardial injury and infarction.

The systematic use of coronary angiography and the availability of increasingly sensitive biomarkers of myocardial cytolysis have determined an increase in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA), which is currently reported in 5-20% of patients with acute myocardial infarction. The first diagnostic criteria of MINOCA were reported by a position paper of the European Society of Cardiology in 2017; since then, these criteria have been revised several times until the current version. The diagnosis of MINOCA requires not only the presence of myocardial damage, indicated by the detection of a rise or fall in cardiac troponin with at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit, but also the clinical evidence of acute myocardial infarction as shown by symptoms, ECG, or imaging. This definition resulted in the exclusion from the umbrella group of MINOCA of certain conditions, such as takotsubo syndrome and myocarditis, that do not have a clear ischemic etiology. The term MINOCA encompasses heterogeneous conditions from a pathophysiological, clinical and therapeutic perspective. For this reason, MINOCA should be used to identify a "working diagnosis", which is the first step of a diagnostic work-up aimed at clarifying the mechanisms and identifying the most appropriate therapy for the individual patient. The aim of this review is to describe the state of the art regarding the definition, classification, and diagnosis of MINOCA, providing an excursus on the principal documents proposed by scientific societies or experts in the field in recent years.

The term cardiac mass refers to benign or malignant cardiac tumors and cardiac metastases but also to pseudotumors, which is a heterogeneous group consisting of thrombi, vegetations and normal variant structures. While primitive cardiac tumors are rare, metastases and pseudotumors are relatively common. The non-invasive diagnostic approach has not been well established in the literature yet. The first-line non-invasive approach consists of echocardiography, which provides good diagnostic accuracy for masses like thrombi, vegetations and some tumors (mainly myxoma and fibroelastoma). In contrast, for other masses, it does not provide information about the potential malignancy because of poor tissue characterization. Second-line (cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance) or third-line (positron emission tomography-computed tomography) evaluations have been validated in the diagnostic approach to cardiac masses by many studies. In fact, a comprehensive diagnostic approach may establish the diagnosis of malignancy without histological report, which is pivotal for the subsequent therapeutic strategy.The aim of this narrative review is to describe the commonly available non-invasive diagnostic techniques for cardiac masses, their potential and limitations and to suggest a diagnostic pathway for common practice.