Search

Background: Nowadays the prognostic role of gender as a relevant factor after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still unfair, since available data in the literature are few and uneven. The aim of this survey was to collect acute and 30-day safety and efficacy clinical data in high- and intermediate-risk women, who underwent TAVI with new-generation devices, in the Campania Region., Methods: All medium and high-volume TAVI centers in Campania have been invited to fulfill an online, ad-hoc questionnaire, collecting pre-, peri- and post-procedural data concerning female patients, treated between January and December 2016., Results: 331 women (representing the 61% of the overall population treated; mean age 83 ± 7 years) underwent TAVI in the participating Campania centers. Age >80 years (72%), high surgical risk score (63%) and frailty (55%) were found to be the top three reasons for the TAVI choice. Overall, 95% of the procedures were performed by transfemoral approach with local anesthesia; the remaining 5% (16 cases) were conducted via transapical (14, 4%) and transaortic (2, 1%) accesses, under general anesthesia. Edwards Sapien 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) and Medtronic Evolut R (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) were the most frequently implanted valves (146, 44% and 132, 43%, respectively). The questioned Centers reported a mean length of hospital stay of 5.5 ± 1.1 days, 1.6 ± 0.37 of which in a cardiac care unit. The most prevalent in-hospital complication was pacemaker implantation (15%), followed by life-threatening vascular complications (3%). The 30-day VARC-2 composite endpoint occurred in 7% of cases, all-cause death in 4%, and stroke in 1%., Conclusions: This survey, the first representative of women undergoing TAVI in Campania, appears to confirm the good safety and efficacy profile of this procedure, also in the high- and intermediate-risk settings, probably favored by a prevalent use of new-generation devices and a low rate prevalence of significant patient comorbidities.

Interventional procedures on peripheral vessels are the field of a novel specialty dedicated to the diagnosis and minimally invasive endovascular treatment of diseases involving the cerebral, thoracic and abdominal arteries (including renal and visceral arteries), as well as the peripheral arteries (femoro-popliteal arteries and the arteries below the knee). At present, physicians with three different types of medical training, each involving particular strengths and characteristics, specialize in endovascular treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease: vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists and interventional cardiologists. Treatment of high-risk patients in terms of anatomical and clinical (serious comorbidities) complexity raised the need for the interventional cardiologist to face issues related to technical aspects of the procedure, multilevel pathology management and adequate indication. To achieve this goal, interventional cardiologists require particular facilities and clinical skills. The objectives of this position paper from the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE) are (i) to define the theoretical background and practical training required to ensure that interventional cardiologists maintain high-quality standards also in the field of treatment of peripheral arterial disease, by establishing shared rules and drafting papers; (ii) to standardize the procedures of interventional cardiology operational units that treat patients with peripheral arterial disease in Italy on the basis of scientific evidence, and (iii) to establish common requirements in terms of facilities and regulations.