Search

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have significantly improved the outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, several concerns remain regarding late adverse events associated with the presence of a permanent rigid metallic cage that might impair the natural healing process of the coronary vessel wall. Recently, PCI with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) has emerged as an interesting alternative with several potential advantages related to the complete resorption process that occurs within 3-5 years. As a consequence, it reduces the trigger for persistent inflammation, enables restoration of normal vessel reactivity and facilitates positive remodeling. However, current BVS have several limitations, including thicker and wider struts, less radial strength, and limited expansion. A hybrid strategy, combining the use of BVS and DES, is a novel approach that could be useful to avoid the limitations of currently available BVS, particularly in case of PCI for complex coronary lesions.We describe a case of hybrid percutaneous intervention with BVS in combination with DES for managing complex lesions unsuitable for pure scaffolding percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background: The bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS) technology constitutes the new revolution of the coronary artery disease interventional treatment. Currently, three distinct types of BRSs are available but only one, the Absorb BVS, was on the market in 2013 when the Regional Commission for Medical Devices and the Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Commission of the Emilia-Romagna Region drew up a technical and scientific essay to provide guidance for the introduction of BRS in public and affiliated health facilities. Five preferential indications were given for use: long coronary lesions (>28 mm), ostial lesions (left main stem excluded), complete revascularization in patients aged <50 years, diffuse disease (>40 mm) or involving the mid/distal left anterior descending (LAD) branch in patients <70 years, spontaneous coronary artery dissection., Methods: This survey analyzed data from all the catheterization laboratories in the Emilia-Romagna Region, merged in a unified database., Results: In a 3-year study period, 546 BRS were implanted in 328 patients, corresponding to 1.5% of the drug-eluting stents (DES) used, with a trend towards a progressive increase over time. Initial indications were followed in 200/328 (61.0%) patients (about one third fitting more indications), mainly for treatment of long lesions in vessels >2.5 mm (67%), young patients (31.5%) and mid/distal LAD (28%). In 22.6% of cases the clinical scenario was a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, in 39.3% a non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Intracoronary imaging was infrequently used (intravascular ultrasound in 24.7% of cases). In 85 patients (25.9%) a hybrid procedure (BVS/DES) was performed., Conclusions: BRS use has resulted lower than expected, with discrete variability among centers, but according to the initial indications of the Emilia-Romagna Region in the majority of cases. The underuse might have been due to operators' caution in their initial experience. However, the increasing trend may reveal a greater confidence in the implantation technique and the whole amount of safety and efficacy data.

Drug-eluting stents (DES) are the current gold standard for percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease. However, DES are associated with a non-negligible risk of long-term adverse events related to persistence of foreign material in the coronary artery wall. In addition, DES implantation causes permanent caging of the native vessel, thus impairing normal vasomotricity and the possibility of using non-invasive coronary imaging or preforming subsequent bypass surgery. On the contrary, coronary bioresorbable stents (BRS) may provide temporary mechanical support to coronary wall without compromising the subsequent recovery of normal vascular physiology, and have the potential to prevent late adverse events related to permanent elements. Several types of BRS have been introduced into clinical practice in Europe or are being tested. However, most of available clinical data relate to a single BRS, the Absorb bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (Absorb BVS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). Despite encouraging clinical results, no societal guidelines are available on the use of BRS in clinical practice.A panel of Italian expert cardiologists assembled under the auspices of the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE) for comprehensive discussion and consensus development, with the aim to provide recommendations on the use of bioresorbable stents in terms of clinical indications, procedural aspects, post-percutaneous coronary angioplasty pharmacologic treatment and follow-up. Based on current evidence and BRS availability in Italian cath-labs, the panel decided unanimously to provide specific recommendations for the Absorb BVS device. These recommendations do not necessarily extend to other BRS, unless specified, although significant overlap may exist with Absorb BVS, particularly in terms of clinical rationale.

Currently, one of the most relevant innovations in interventional cardiology is the advent of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). Among the BVS developed so far, the AbsorbTM BVS 1.1 (Abbott®) is one of the two devices that achieved the CE mark for the use in clinical practice. A reasonable amount of clinical evidence on AbsorbTM BVS has been built up from a large series of trials, of which some have been completed and others are in the enrollment and/or follow-up phases. However, at present there is paucity of data on the efficacy and safety of AbsorbTM BVS in patients with more complex coronary artery disease, who represent the majority of those undergoing coronary stenting in everyday clinical practice. To fill this gap, several all-comers registries are ongoing, with the aim to assess the efficacy and safety of the scaffold in subgroups with particularly complex coronary lesions. The AbsorbTM BVS 1.1 registries include IT-DISAPPEARS (NCT02004730), an Italian multicenter registry, started in December 2013, and endorsed by the Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology (GISE). This registry will enroll only patients with long lesions and/or multivessel coronary disease, with an expected considerable proportion of included patients having complex disease. Therefore, the implementation of meticulous and appropriate implantation technique is of key importance for the accurate assessment of scaffold performance in a broad spectrum of coronary lesions. With the aim of standardizing the procedure for patients included in the IT-DISAPPEARS registry, the present article reports the technical features of Absorb TM BVS 1.1 implantation.

The therapeutic use of stem cells and tissue engineering techniques are emerging in urology. Here, stem cell types, their differentiating potential and fundamental characteristics are illustrated. The cancer stem cell hypothesis is reported with reference to the role played by stem cells in the origin, development and progression of neoplastic lesions. In addition, recent reports of results obtained with stem cells alone or seeded in scaffolds to overcome problems of damaged urinary tract tissue are summarized. Among others, the application of these biotechnologies in urinary bladder, and urethra are delineated. Nevertheless, apart from the ethical concerns raised from the use of embryonic stem cells, a lot of questions need to be solved concerning the biology of stem cells before their widespread use in clinical trials. Further investigation is also required in tissue engineering utilizing animal models.

Aim: As part of regenerative bone surgery, according to the principles of tissue engineering and GBR, the use of biomaterials aims to restore bone deficiencies by restoring both functionality and original morphology of the bone tissue. Besides being biocompatible, biofunctional and reabsorbable, the ideal scaffolding should possess an osteoinductive geometry, which depends on many physical-chemical characteristics and, in particular, on a three-dimensional morphology and the placement of molecules, which would determine pore size and interconnection between them. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to carry out an analysis with a scanning electron microscope, in order to evaluate the effect of the diameter size of the scaffold pores on the bio-molecular interaction between osteoblast-like MG63 cells and four biomaterials with different pore sizes: polylactic-co-glycolic acid, deproteinized bovine bone, equine bone, demineralized bone matrix (DBM)., Methods: Through the observations made with SEM and X-ray microanalysis, it is possible to infer how the morphology, the proliferative ability, the modality of adhesion and the differentiation of MG63 cells are influenced in different ways by the porous structure of the various biomaterials used as a substrate for growth., Results: From among all of the biomaterials examined, DBM represented the best substrate for growth; in fact, there would be a more intense and precocious adhesion of MG-63 cells., Conclusion: The strong osteoconductive effect observed in human DBM, seems to be related to the presence of the organic component, while the osteoinductive effect would be mainly attributed to the presence of BMPs.

Bioengineering skin represents a successful outcome in the interdisciplinary research applied to reconstructive surgery. In this study we report our experience in the reconstruction of a wide traumatic wound by autologous engineered skin, grown on a biomaterial scaffold. Advantages were rapid reparation of the trauma and good scars.