Search

Gastric adenoma (dysplasia) is a precursor for gastric cancer and is closely associated with intestinal type gastric cancer. Thus, accurate diagnosis and proper management of gastric adenoma are extremely critical for preventing gastric cancer. The revised Vienna and World Health Organization classifications have categorized gastric adenomas into two types: high-grade and low-grade dysplasia. High-grade dysplasia requires endoscopic resection due to synchronous carcinoma or the high risk of progression to carcinoma. Although the treatment for low-grade dysplasia remains controversial, endoscopic resection is also recommended due to the potential of progression to carcinomas and the unrevealed histologic discrepancies between forceps biopsy and endoscopic specimens. According to the Lauren classification, gastric cancer is categorized into three histologic types: intestinal, diffuse, and mixed types. Intestinal and diffuse types show a distinct difference in their clinical and epidemiological features. The intestinal type, in its pathogenesis, follows the cascade of non-atrophic gastritis, atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, adenoma, and intramucosal neoplasia (correa cascade). It tends to appear in older ages than diffuse type and show some predominance in the distal portion of the stomach. It is more common in males and is often associated with environmental factors. In this review, the current knowledge of gastric adenoma and intestinal type gastric cancer, together with relevant diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, is discussed.

A primary extranodal B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) is a distinct clinical-pathological entity that develops in diverse anatomic locations. However, colorectal involvement is rare. The authors encountered a case of a MALT lymphoma of the rectum in a 69-year-old woman who complained of up to 3 kg weight loss during 3 months. A colonoscopy demonstrated a 1.0×1.0 cm sized subepithelial tumor (SET) at the lower rectum. The patient underwent an endoscopic mucosal resection with ligation for the SET. Pathological analysis revealed marked small to medium-sized lymphocytic infiltration. Immunohistochemistry revealed neoplastic cells positive for CD20 and bcl-2. A polymerase chain reaction detected immunoglobulin H gene rearrangement. Finally, rectal MALT lymphoma was diagnosed. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography scans showed that there was no lymph node metastasis or other organ involvement. A bone marrow biopsy was found to be negative for any neoplastic process. Therefore, the Ann Arbor stage was IeB. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) was not detected in the gastric biopsy specimens. Thus far, she has had no relapse since the endoscopic resection. The incidence of rectal MALT is very rare, and treatment is unclear. This paper reports a case of rectal MALT lymphoma treated successfully with only an endoscopic resection.

Background/Aims For systematic screening protocol for the stomach (SSS), 22 gastroscopy images are considered sufficient to avoid blind spots during gastroscopy. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the number of gastroscopy images taken during the gastroscopy procedure and the detection rate of clinically significant gastric lesions (CSGLs). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data obtained from a cohort of consecutive subjects at a health promotion center. The primary outcome measure was the detection rate of CSGLs per endoscopist, according to the number of gastroscopy images. We also analyzed whether all the CSGLs were detected via SSS. Results The mean number of gastroscopy images obtained by eight endoscopists was 27.6±10.5 in 2,912 subjects without CSGLs and without biopsies. Among the 5,970 subjects who underwent gastroscopy by the eight endoscopists, 712 CSGLs were detected in 551 subjects. Fifty-six CSGLs (7.9%) in 55 subjects (10.0%) were not detected during the SSS. Photo-endoscopists who took more images achieved a higher detection rate of CSGLs than those who took fewer images (adjusted OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.41~3.05; P

Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is mandatory for the effective management of many gastroduodenal diseases. Currently, various diagnostic methods are available for detecting these infections, and the choice of method should take into account the clinical condition, accessibility, advantage, disadvantage, as well as cost-effectiveness. The diagnostic methods are divided into invasive (endoscopic-based) and non-invasive methods. Non-invasive methods included urea breath test, stool antigen test, serology, and molecular methods. Invasive methods included endoscopic imaging, rapid urease test, histology, culture, and molecular methods. In this article, we provide a review of the currently available options and recent advances of various diagnostic methods.

Background /Aims: Esophageal eosinophilia occurs in many conditions, including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE), which have been increasingly recognized in Western countries. There have been only a few reports in Korea. Here, we evaluated the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of patients with esophageal eosinophilia from our experience. Methods: Nineteen patients were diagnosed with esophageal eosinophilia based on typical symptoms, endoscopic features, esophageal eosinophilia with ≥15 eosinophils/high power field, and response to medication by PPI. Symptoms, endoscopic and pathological findings were evaluated. Results: Of the 19 patients, 2 patients were diagnosed with EoE, 7 patients were diagnosed with PPI-REE, and 10 patients were undetermined due to loss to follow-up. Among these 19 patients, dysphagia was present in 11, and heartburn, dyspepsia and reflux in 8. Sixteen patients had common endoscopic features, such as longitudinal furrows, concentric rings, strictures, and white plaques; however, 3 patients had normal findings. Nine patients underwent endoscopy at the time of follow-up. Two patients had complete resolution, and 3 had partial resolution. However, 4 patients showed no endoscopic changes. All patients showed symptom improvements. Conclusions: The clinical and endoscopic characteristics of both groups in Korea were undistinguishable. However, after treatment, endoscopic findings were different between the two groups. Large-scale studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Gastric adenoma (dysplasia) is a precancerous lesion. Therefore, managements of gastric adenomas are important for preventing the development of gastric cancers and for detecting gastric cancers at earlier stages. The Vienna classification divides gastric adenomas into two categories: high-grade dysplasia and low-grade dysplasia. Generally, endoscopic resection is performed for adenoma with high-grade dysplasia due to the coexistence of carcinoma and the potential of progression to carcinomas. However, the treatments of adenoma with low-grade dysplasia remain controversial. Currently two treatment strategies for the low-grade type have been suggested; First is the ‘wait and see’ strategy; Second is endoscopic treatment (e.g., endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, or argon plasma coagulation). In this review, we discuss the current optimal strategies for endoscopic management of gastric adenoma.