Search

Copyright of Technological & Economic Development of Economy is the property of Vilnius Gediminas Technical University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Cultural heritage buildings are an important origin of a country's cultural memory, originality, and attractiveness, which motivated cultural growth, economic development, and social employment. However, cultural heritage buildings threaten to decay regarding the contributing poor funding for cultural heritage buildings preservation and maintenance, increasing urbanization changes. The adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings is one of the reasons, helping to preserve heritage buildings. This paper submits qualitative and quantitative criteria and subcriteria for the adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings. The set of criteria consists of economic, social, environmental, cultural heritage and legal criterion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cultural heritage buildings are an important origin of a country‘s cultural memory, originality, and attractiveness, which motivated cultural growth, economic development, and social employment. However, cultural heritage buildings threaten to decay regarding the contributing poor funding for cultural heritage buildings preservation and maintenance, increasing urbanization changes. The adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings is one of the reasons, helping to preserve heritage buildings. This paper submits qualitative and quantitative criteria and subcriteria for the adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings. The set of criteria consists of economic, social, environmental, cultural heritage and legal criterion. Kriterijų parinkimas kultūros paveldo pastatų pakartotiniam naudojimui Santrauka Kultūros paveldo pastatai – svarbus šalies kultūrinės atminties, savitumo ir patrauklumo šaltinis, skatinantis šalies kultūrinį augimą, ekonominį vystymąsi ir socialinį užimtumą. Tačiau, skiriant nepakankamą finansavimą paveldo pastatų priežiūrai ir išsaugojimui, didėjant urbanizacijos pokyčiams gresia šių pastatų sunykimas. Todėl paveldo pastatų pakartotinis naudojimas – viena iš išeičių, padėsiančių išsaugoti paveldo pastatus. Straipsnyje siūlomas paveldo pastatų pakartotinio naudojimo kriterijų rinkinys. Pasiūlyti kriterijai suskirstyti į kiekybinius ir kokybinius kriterijus bei subkriterijus. Kriterijų rinkinį sudaro ekonominiai, socialiniai, aplinkos, kultūros paveldo ir teisiniai kriterijai. Kriterijai skirti paveldo pastatų pakartotinio naudojimo alternatyvoms vertinti. Reikšminiai žodžiai: paveldo pastatai, kultūros pastatai, pakartotinis naudojimas, kriterijai, vertinimas.

The paper is devoted to the study of the problem of effective quality evaluation of the implementation of municipal target programs in the regions of the Russian Federation. The evaluation of target programs is a methodologically complex process that requires not only specific knowledge, but also well-formed tools (approaches for effectiveness assessment). The authors revealed that there is no all-purpose approach to assess the effectiveness of municipal target programs in municipalities of the Russian Federation. However, municipalities develop different criteria and scales to evaluate the effectiveness of different programs. It is determined that the assessment is mainly based on two indicators, namely, the social outcome and budget efficiency resulting from the assessment of achievement of the planned targets of indicators. The authors emphasize the importance to interconnect the indicators of target programs’ implementation and strategic industry based plans. The method of integral assessment of program effectiveness is developed to make it possible to evaluate the implementation of programs at each stage to compare the results with the planned ones and to record critical moments that affect the effectiveness of program implementation to use tools to eliminate or minimize the impact of the risk events.