Search

In recent years, the focus on augmented renal clearance increased as it was found by other researchers to result in subtherapeutic drug dosing concentrations. Accurate assessment of renal function is important for prescribing optimal dosis of pharmaceuticals for ARC patients. Objective of the work: The purpose of this quantitative retrospective comparative study was to register possible cases of Accelerated renal clearance in patients of Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics and analyse the differences in assessments of cases of Augmented Renal Clearance and the possible risks of ARC for therapy. Tasks: To achieve the objective several tasks were raised: 1) to register possible ARC patients cases as assessed by Cocroft-Gault and their possible associated reasons; 2) to analyse differences in three for GFR estimation used equations (Cocroft-Gault, MDRD simplified, and CKD-EPI). 3) determine the risk drugs for changed renal elimination. Methodology: ARC survey (appendix 1) was filled about patients from various departments of Clinics during the period of 2013 03-04 – 2013 12-20. All patients were selected according serum creatinine values that were 50 µmol/l. or less. Two goups of patients were assigned for analysis: patients were grouped according Cocroft - Gault creatinine clearance values: (1) ARC group A CrCl >130 ml./min and (2) comparative Non-ARC group B CrCl 90-130 ml./min. In the group A were 31 and in the group B - 5 patients included for analysis. Results: The mean GFR values of the research group were statistically significant: Cockroft-Gault – 164.8±34.50 ml./min., MDRD simplified – 169.7± 39.7 ml./min./1.73 m² and 123.3± 19.9 50 ml./min./1.73 m² by CKD-EPI (p