Search

Tado Vrublevskio įsteigtoje Eustachijaus ir Emilijos Vrublevskių bibliotekos draugijoje, taip pat Vrublevskių bibliotekos draugijoje mokslui remti, vėliau Vrublevskių bibliotekoje, be rankraščių, knygų ir kitų spaudinių, buvo renkami ir grafikos kūriniai. Dabar jie saugomi LMA Vrublevskių bibliotekos rinkiniuose. Straipsnyje norima aptarti Vrublevskių bibliotekos raižinių rinkinį. Tyrinėjami grafikos kūriniuose esantys įrašai, kurie padeda atskleisti sąsajas su buvusiais savininkais ir jų rinkiniais. The holdings of the Wroblewski Library of the Academy of Sciences include pieces of graphics containing manuscript inscriptions pointing to the collections of the Wroblewski Library of the early 20th century. These pieces, along with books, manuscripts, maps and other museum valuables, started to be amassed in 1912, by the Society of the Friends of the Eustachy and Emilia Wróblewski Library. The latter was founded in Vilnius by the lawyer and bibliophile Tadeusz Wróblewski and later reorganized to the Eustachy and Emilia Wróblewski Society for Science Support. The inscriptions discussed in the article are classified into six groups in order to identify the initials of the owners, their collections and donated art pieces. Some of the inscriptions are gift dedications that characterize the owners of the engravings and their environment. The examination of the engravings shows that the collection of the Wroblewski library has been formed from private collections owned by various individuals in the 19th–early 20th century. The previous owners of the engravings include both the authors of some of the inscriptions and individuals mentioned in their texts. Not all of them were noted collectors, some probably owned only a few art pieces, while others were family estate executors.

The article analyzes the conflict of interests between the two groups (Kaunas "Žalgiris" basketball club managers / owners and the club’s fans), the division of the club management principles and specific approaches to club governance. The aim of the article is to analyze the structure of relations and explain the tension between conflict participants. The managers/owners of "Žalgiris" club linked the management of the club with the development of individually formed tasks through their chosen criteria, and the adoption of a sudden, specific decision, not necessarily informing or involving the club fans in it. Meanwhile, fans linked the management of the club with the development of more open and public control policy and discussing tasks for the club in wider circle of interested persons on the basis of a long-term tradition of the club, rather than making quick decisions. The analysis of specific conflict object (management of "Žalgiris" club) makes this conflict very unusual. Officially club is a private property, which had been legally gained by the former owner. However, fans are vital to each sport club because their support contributes to the creation of the economic value of the club. The possessiveness of club becomes two sided: on the one hand it officially belongs to the legal owner, on the other – and symbolically – to the fans. Tension and conflict begin to grow if the agreement/interpretation of mutual roles between fans and owners diverge. Due to a rich tradition of public participation in sport, a strong public interest in sport and in "Žalgiris" in particular arose. For a long time the interests among sports fans and club owners coincided in Lithuania. The origin of the conflict (in analyzed case) is very symbolic, that is, the tension points became apparent when fans start to believe that their role is getting scarcer and the owner tends to behave too drastically in club management. Such a conflict became possible because of the specific Lithuanian tradition of sport support. Conflict participants chose resisting / rivalling strategy – when for each side is more important to prove their rights instead of taking care of mutual relationships. This strategy remained tight during the entire conflict.

Bibliotheca Sapiehana vadinama vienos garsiausių ir žymiausių LDK didikų Sapiegų biblioteka. Pradėta kaupti LDK kanclerio, Vilniaus vaivados ir didžiojo etmono Leono Sapiegos (1557-1633), biblioteka buvo papildoma ir jo sūnų - Jono Stanislovo (1585-1635), Kristupo Mikalojaus (1607-1631), Kazimiero Leono (1609-1656) - knygomis. 1655 metais LDK pakanclerio Kazimiero Leono Sapiegos testamentu Vilniaus akademijai buvo padovanota beveik 3000 šios giminės knygų, kurios dėl savo išskirtinumo vėliau gavo Bibliotheca Sapiehana vardą. Šiuo metu žinoma tik dešimtoji šio rinkinio dalis. Straipsnio apžvelgiamas knygų turinys siekiant išaiškinti kokių autorių kūriniai buvo skaitomi LDK, kuo jie svarbūs ir reikšmingi to meto Lietuvos, Europos mokslui ir kultūrai. Sapiegų giminės bibliotekoje būta įvairių mokslo sričių knygų, parašytų prancūzų, vokiečių, anglų, italų, ispanų, olandų, lenkų, graikų ir lotynų kalbomis. Literatūra lotynų kalba užima pirmą vietą. Klasikinių kalbų bei antikinės literatūros studijavimas sudarė to meto Europoje vyravusios humanitarinio mokymo sistemos pagrindą, todėl greta kalbų vadovėlių Sapiegos savo bibliotekoje buvo įvairių Antikos autorių veikalų. Sapiegos taip pat domėjosi Viduramžių, Renesanso bei Baroko literatūra. Laisvalaikiu buvo skaitomi riterinio žanro ir kt. tuo metu populiarūs romanai. Pažymėtina, kad greta populiarių to meto užsienio rašytojų veikalų Sapiegos skaitė ir LDK autorių kūrybą. Nedidelę Bibliotheca Sapiehana rinkinio dalį sudaro retorikos veikalai, didžiausiąją – karinės, istorinės ir geografinės tematikos knygos. Bibliotheca Sapiehana is a commonly accepted name of the personal library of the very notable in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (GDL) noblemen Sapieha. The library was started store by the Chancellor of the GDL, the Voivode of Vilnius and the Grand Herman Leo Sapieha (1557-1633) and later by his three sons Joannes Stanislaus (1585-1635), Christophorus Nicolaus (1607-1631) and Casimirus Leo (1609-1656). The Sapieha personal library of approximately 3000 volumes by the will of Casimirus Leo was presented to Vilnius Academy in 1655 and because of its oneness was named as Bibliotheca Sapiehana. At present only tenth of it remained in the Vilnius University Library, consequently it is very difficult to say, what the owners of Bibliotheca Sapiehana read. The aim of this article is to look further at the content of the books, to realize which works were read, why they are so important and significant to the Europe culture.