Search

Objective: The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has become widely accepted as a form of assessment in medical education. At the same time, the more traditional multiple choice question (MCQ) examinations remain a central modality of student assessment. This pilot survey aimed to investigate students' perceptions about the bene- fits of the OSCE and MCQs to yield data supporting the implementation of this assessment strategy into the national medical licensing examination in Germany. Methods: A questionnaire was delivered electronically to 34 German medical schools. Students in years 3-6 were invited to rate 11 items about objectives of good medical assessment. All items were presented for both the OSCE and MCQs using a 5-point Likert Scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Factor analysis was used to identify un- derlying components in the ratings. Average scores of items that be- longed to a component were computed. Results: Data analysis included 1,082 students from 32 medical schools. For the OSCE, factor analysis revealed two components, which were labelled "educational impact" and "development of clinical com- petence". The average scores of items were 3.37 and 3.55, respectively. For the MCQ modality, also two components emerged. These were la- belled "perceived weaknesses of MCQs" and "perceived strengths of MCQs" (consisting of items such as "promotes my theoretical knowledge"). The average scores for these components were 1.85 and 3.62. Conclusion: The results of this pilot survey indicate that students consider both OSCE and MCQs as useful assessments for the purposes for which they were designed. The assessment strategy thus appears appropriate and it should be used in the national licensing examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]