Search

Human rights is a superior and valuable system and an evolved and modern form of natural rights, which consists of four fundamental principles: "the principle of human dignity and dignity", "the principle of freedom", "the principle of equality" and "the principle of fraternity" and other principles and rights proposed in the human rights instruments are under the mentioned principles. On the other hand, administrative law, which is a sub-branch of public law and defined in the constitution of every political system, and compared to other legal trends, is nascent and new, deals with regulating the relations between the administrative apparatus and government organizations with individuals and citizens. Recent developments regarding the duties and performance of governments in the social arena and their use of public privileges in order to "advance public order and social services" have caused violations of human rights standards in the field of administrative law system. The important point is the impact of human rights standards on the decisions of administrative courts and the effectiveness of administrative proceedings from human rights standards. In this research, according to the examination of the administrative laws of Iran, England and Australia, it has been tried to take advantage of the judicial procedure that has led to the development and implementation of the principles and rules of human rights. The research method in this paper is based on library studies and analyzesinformation in a descriptive-analytical way. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article seeks to examine the dynamics of the AUKUS Treaty on Australia's deterrence and its relationship to the United States' combined capabilities in the Indo-Pacific region. The main question is: How will the AUKUS Treaty enable Australia to play a deterrent role in the region? What capabilities and opportunities does this treaty give it to shape its security environment? According to the hypothesis, by changing East Asian countries' perceptions of the China threat, the AUKUS treaty, by creating a transformation in Australia's defense and security strategy, will allow it to emerge as a naval power by adapting to the strategic inter-domain deterrence of the United States and the United Kingdom, and by activating the dynamics of power and force associated with the security network of the United States in the Indo-Pacific to control the order through conventional deterrence against China. The results of the research using the theoretical approach of deterrence show that the AUKUS agreement, by providing Australia with a future nuclear deterrent capability, has changed the order of the Indo-Pacific by shifting it from a "geography of peace" to a "geography of conflict", causing order to operate on the edge of chaos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]