Search

The notion of quality of life (QL) was first introduced in the US in the 50-ies. This notion is much broader then health, it is a personal, subjective feeling of well-being that comes from actual, widely-meant life experiences. The QL is not a measurable value, however, it may be assessed by means of appropriate indices. In the contemporary holistic attitude to a patient, in modern oncology, QL has become a parameter of equal importance to other values characterizing the treatment success, as important as numbers describing e.g. mean survival, disease free survival, or neoplasm controlled survival. Head and neck neoplasms bring about deterioration of the basic functions of the organism such as: breathing, swallowing, speaking and senses: hearing, taste and smell. Application of treatment may intensify pain, dyspnea, hoarseness or cause any kind of discomfort. It influences directly the patients' family and social life. Comparison of QL of patients treated for larynx, tongue, tonsill, glands, and paranasal sinuses neoplasms depending on localisation of primary foci, advancement of the disease, the applied treatment and its radicality, age, sex, place of living (town/country), and educational level. Correlation between the subjectively assessed QL and the objectively evaluated condition of the patient is measured. In ENT Dept. K. Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences 46 patients were examined from May to September 2000. EORTC QLQ C-30, EORTC QLQ-Head and Neck and HAD scale were used. Kiel Questionnaire was introduced in September. The main reason for introducing it was the fact, that surgery is the method of choice in the treatment of head and neck malignancies in our Dept. The team composed of a psychologist and an ENT doctor has been working together on objective assessment of each patient. The QL assessment may be of practical importance when trying to improve the model of health care in cases of oncological patients. This knowledge enables us to learn how the accompanying side effects of therapy influence the QL of our patients, and how these problems may be overcome by proper education, advice, and support provided by the qualified staff. The authors are evaluating the QL in the period of 2, 6 months and 1 year after surgery in patients not supported psychologically. Our goal, in the future, is to introduce the psychological treatment, i.e. repetitive meetings in small groups, conducted by a psychologist. We have contacted 4 major ENT centers in Poland in order to coordinate the research on detailed assessment of QL in Head and Neck Cancer Patients in Poland. The results will be presented in the further publications.