Search

Background: fibromyalgia is a non-inflammatory musculoskeletal syndrome, with a chronic nature and unknown aetiology, characterized by widespread pain, increase in sensibility to palpation and by symptoms such as insomnia, stiffness, fatigue, psychological sickness, intolerance to cold and otologic complaints. Procedures: two female patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia, aged 52 to 61 years, were evaluated in the Otoneurology sector of a institution, in September 2008, and consulted for: dizziness, paraesthesia, perception of movement of objects, imbalance on walking, falls, fatigue, depression, headaches, and difficulty in listening and moving the neck. They were submitted to the following procedures: anamnesis, otological inspection, audiologic evaluation and vestibular exam through vectoelectronystagmography. Results: the following discoveries were noted: Patient 1 - hearing loss of the sensorineural type from 2 KHz in the left ear, normal hearing thresholds in the right ear and hypo-reflexia with an absolute value of 42ºC in the caloric test in the right ear. Patient 2 - normal hearing thresholds, bilaterally, and hyper-reflexia with an absolute value of 42ºC in the caloric test in the right ear with an intense neurovegetative manifestation. Conclusion: the submitted cases demonstrated the importance of audiologic evaluations and vestibular exams in the contribution to elaboration of strategies used in the therapeutic consolidation of fibromyalgia suggesting the performance of those exams as a clinical routine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cervical range of motion (CROM) is a fundamental component of the functional evaluation in physical therapy interventions. The CROM device stands out as a reliable, non-invasive and easy-to-use method, but it is a very expensive tool. In clinical practice, more affordable tools such as Fleximeters are preferred. However, the reliability of Fleximeters for the cervical spine has not been adequately tested. Objectives: To compare the Fleximeters and the CROM device for the analysis of CROM, and to investigate the intra- and inter-examiner reliability of both tools. Methods: Cervical movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation) were assessed in 20 asymptomatic young women by three examiners using both tools. The statistical analyses were performed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The agreement between the tools was considered moderate for flexion and left rotation (0.71; 0.58) and excellent for all of the other movements (0.76-0.87). The intra-examiner reliability for the CROM device was moderate for flexion and right rotation (0.70; 0.69) and excellent for all of the other movements (0.79-0.88). For the Fleximeter, the agreement was excellent for inclination and right rotation (0.80; 0.77) and moderate for all of the other movements (0.69-0.75). The inter-examiner reliability for the CROM device was excellent for all movements (0.76-0.93) and for the Fleximeter, it was moderate for right and left rotation (0.66; 0.75) and excellent for all of the other movements (0.81-0.88). Conclusions: There was agreement between the CROM assessments using the Fleximeter and the CROM device. Furthermore, both devices showed acceptable reliability for clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde is the property of Revista Brasileira em Promocao da Saude and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Fisioterapia Brasil is the property of Atlantica Editora and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)