Search

Copyright of Pandectele Române is the property of Wolters Kluwer Romania and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In this PPT, a presentation is made about the sale of veterinary medicinal products at a distance (online) and through community pharmacies in the light of the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2019/6 regarding the online sale of veterinary medicinal products and Romanian legislation. In Romania, remote retail (on-line) sales of veterinary medicinal products can be carried out: only through veterinary pharmacies authorized by a sanitary-veterinarian and veterinary pharmaceutical points registered by a sanitary-veterinary, and only with veterinary medicinal products that are issued without a medical prescription veterinarian. Every economic operator who wants to carry out remote retail trade activities must send a notification to ANSVSA (according to the model provided in Annex 3.1 of Order of the President of ANSVSA no. 83/2014). After verification for compliance with the legislation in force, ANSVSA enters the operator in the list of retailers, who are allowed to sell veterinary medicinal products online. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study aims to analyse the meaning of the term „reasonable grounds" enshrined in paragraph (2) of Article 11 of Law No 554/2004 on Administrative Proceedings. Neither the relevant framework law, nor any other regulation defines this concept, which creates problems in practice. The tendency in case law is to consider that „reasonable grounds" must be understood as a situation beyond the person's control, insurmountable, in case of force majeure or fortuitous event. The present study seeks to correct this view and to promote the interpretation that the notion can be understood both in the sense mentioned above and in one where the parties use administrative methods to prevent a dispute from arising. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prescription of criminal liability consists in extinguishing the criminal legal relationship of conflict, as a result of its non-fulfillment within a certain term provided by law. By prescription, the criminal liability is extinguished, meaning the state's right to bring the perpetrator to criminal responsibility and to apply the punishment provided by law for the committed crime is extinguished and, at the same time, the perpetrator's obligation to bear the consequences of committing the crime is extinguished. From the point of view of the legal nature, the prescription of criminal liability is an extinguishing cause of criminal liability, determined by the influence that the passage of time exerts on the need to resort to criminal coercion. Taking into account its politicocriminal grounds, the criminal prescription appears as an institution of general application, which always operates obligatorily, and will be applied ex officio, its effects occurring from the moment of fulfillment of the prescription term (ex tunc) and not from the moment finding this fact (ex nunc). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This presentation gives a brief overview of the impact that recent legislative changes have had on the distribution and availability of a.u.v. in Romania. Among the consequences are the difficulties related to the understanding and adaptation of veterinarians and veterinary pharmacies to the new standardized prescriptions, the increased tendency to transform pharmacies into pet shops, labor market problems and the shortage of veterinarians pharmacists, and negative discrimination in activities. inspection and control, the weak reaction of the authorities, and last but not least the inefficiency of the social dialogue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The unjust enrichment of a person who is enriched at the expense of another constitutes a legal fact, a civil source of obligation, in which a legal relationship is born based on the enriched being held to reestablished the patrimonial balance through the action of restituition, actio de in rem verso. This action of restitutution is exercised on the general ground of 3 year limitation period regulated by article 2517 of the Civil Cod. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Pandectele Române is the property of Wolters Kluwer Romania and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Româna de Dreptul Muncii is the property of Wolters Kluwer Romania and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)