Search

In this paper, I proceeded to examine the crime of false identity regarding the text of the act of incrimination. Thus, we analysed the subjects, as well as the objective and subjective side of the crime with direct reference to the recent judicial practice in the matter. We also highlighted the elements of similarity as well as those of differentiation between the texts of the two laws, the analysis being useful both from a doctrinal perspective and for the identification and application of the more favourable criminal law. The novelty elements consist in the analysis performed, with reference to the recent judicial practice, as well as in the citation of several authors from the Romanian doctrine. The paper is part of a university course to be published by a recognized publishing house in the field of legal sciences. By the way of approach, the paper can be useful to the students of the profile faculties in the country, as well as to the practitioners of the criminal law.

This study examines one of the new incriminations recently introduced in the Romanian law, incrimination with a qualified active subject, its qualification consisting in his special quality, more precisely, the quality of lawyer or representative of one of the parties in a criminal or civil trial. The introduction of this incrimination was determined by the attitude and behavior of some lawyers that, crossing the line of their specific duties as defenders brought severe prejudices to the party they were defending or representing. The novelty elements consist in the analysis of this new offense, with a focus on the elements that are part of its constitutive content, emphasizing the objective aspect. The work can be useful for researchers in the field, for academics, as well as for the legal practice in the field.

In this paper we have conducted a general examination of the instruments governing the European institution of the European evidence warrant, viewed as a new form of judicial cooperation in criminal matters between Member States of the European Union. The novelty consists of the conducted examination, the critical opinions and proposals de lege ferenda. The paper continues the scientific research achieved by publishing other studies and articles in some journals or proceedings of international or national conferences, which were examined by other European legal instruments regulating different forms of judicial cooperation in criminal matters or different forms of legal assistance. The work can be useful both to academics and practitioners, to the Romanian or European legislator with specific responsibilities in the area of international judicial cooperation in criminal matters.

Within the paper it is examined the institution of extradition between Romania and Serbia, in the light of the provisions of the Treaty into force and the Romanian special law. We have also achieved a comparative examination between the provisions of the bilateral instrument and that of the European Convention on Extradition of 1957, an aspect which highlighted some elements of resemblance between them, several provisions of the European legislative act being taken into the bilateral legal act. The elements of novelty of this paper concern the comparative examination of the two international legal instruments, references to Romanian special law and de lege ferenda proposal, through which we express our opinion for the adoption of a new law regulating the institution of extradition between the two countries. The work can be useful for academics and institutions with direct responsibilities in the domain of judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the two states.

In the present work we examined the constitutive content of the offense of not complying with the regime of explosive materials, according to the new provisions of the new Criminal Code. The paper can be helpful both to theorists and those who carry their activity in preventing and combating crime of this kind. The innovations consist of the objective and subjective side examination of the crime, focusing on the changes in its legal content.

Within this paper there were briefly examined the trafficking in persons offenses the two European normative acts, namely the Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA and the Directive 2011/36UE, which repealed the first instrument, and some aspects of legal content of offenses of the two acts. The innovation and interest elements are represented by the comparative examination and highlighted by the incriminations development, thus identifying new ways to prevent and combat them. The work can be useful to those practicing in this field and in the academic environment or to the European or Romanian legislator.

In this paper we examine briefly the provisions of two European acts establishing acriminal penalty system for discharges of polluting substances in waters under the jurisdiction of EUMember State. Although the two European legislative acts were adopted in 2005, the conductedresearch represents a novelty, and it can be useful both to theorists, practitioners in the field, and tothe European legislator. Essential contribution to the field, is to examine the documents adopted atEU level, as well as critical opinions formulated, completed and the need to supplement or takinganother piece of legislation, given the new changes in the structure of crime in the area, and the needfor effective preventive measures. Also, the paper highlights the need for increased specific activitiesof judicial cooperation in criminal matters between Member States, by adopting effective legislation,including the territorial jurisdiction and resolve operational conflicts of competence Also, the paperhighlights the need for increased specific activities of judicial cooperation in criminal mattersbetween Member States, by adopting effective legislation, including the territorial jurisdiction andhence the operative resolving conflicts of jurisdiction arising between Member States or between aMember State or a state not a member of the European Union.