1. Suppression head impulse test (SHIMP) versus head impulse test (HIMP) when diagnosing bilateral vestibulopathy
- Author
-
Tessa van Dooren, Dmitrii Starkov, Florence Lucieer, Bieke Dobbels, Miranda Janssen, Nils Guinand, Angelica Pérez Fornos, Herman Kingma, Vincent Van Rompaey, Raymond van de Berg, KNO, MUMC+: MA AIOS Keel Neus Oorheelkunde (9), RS: MHeNs - R1 - Cognitive Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, FHML Methodologie & Statistiek, RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, RS: MHeNs - R3 - Neuroscience, MUMC+: MA Keel Neus Oorheelkunde (9), MUMC+: HZC Audiologisch Centrum Maastricht (9), and MUMC+: HZC Vestibulogie (9)
- Subjects
компенсаторные саккады ,covert saccades ,General Medicine ,VOR gain ,двусторонняя вестибулопатия ,SHIMP ,VESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX GAIN ,HIMP ,VHIT ,compensatory saccades ,bilateral vestibulopathy ,скрытые саккады ,CRITERIA ,Human medicine - Abstract
The Suppression Head Impulse (SHIMP) test was introduced as an alternative to the Head Impulse Paradigm (HIMP) to overcome challenges in VOR gain calculation due to the interference of covert saccades. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine if SHIMP, compared to HIMP, reduces covert saccades in BV patients and (2) to define the agreement on diagnosing BV between SHIMP and HIMP. First, the number of covert saccades was compared between SHIMP and HIMP. Secondly, VOR gain was compared between SHIMP and HIMP. Lastly, the agreement between SHIMP and HIMP on identifying BV (horizontal VOR gain
- Published
- 2022