Search

The aim of this study was to evaluate sequence coverage of five model proteins (CYB5A, SMAD4, RAB27B, FECH, and CXXC1) by means of shotgun proteomic data analysis employing different methods of data treatment including database-dependent search engines (MASCOT and X!Tandem) and de novo sequencing software ((PEAKS, Novor, and PepNovo+). In order to achieve maximal results, multiprotease hydrolysis including enzymes trypsin, LYS-C, ASPN and GluC was performed in solution and using the FASP method. High resolution mass spectrometry was carried out with a Q EXACTIVE HF hybrid mass spectrometer in the positive ionization mode; parent ions with the highest intensity and a charge range from +2 to +6 were fragmented in the HCD mode. 27 experiments were carried out (hydrolysis with each of 5 enzymes in solution, 4 for the FASP protocol, three technical repeats). Using parameters limiting false identification of peptides, the search engines and de novo sequencing software gave similar results. The degree of sequence coverage was not at least 40%, and in the best cases it reached 80-90%. The use of de novo sequencing software resulted in identification of the Y12H amino acid substitution in one model protein (CYB5A).

Three de novo sequencing programs (Novor, PEAKS and PepNovo+) have been used for identification of 48 individual human proteins constituting the Universal Proteomics Standard Set 2 (UPS2) ("Sigma-Aldrich", USA). Experimental data have been obtained by tandem mass spectrometry. The MS/MS was performed using pure UPS2 and UPS2 mixtures with E. coli extract and human plasma samples. Protein detection was based on identification of at least two peptides of 9 residues in length or one peptide containing at least 13 residues. Using these criteria 13 (Novor), 20 (PEAKS) and 11 (PepNovo+) proteins were detected in pure UPS2 sample. Protein identifications in mixed samples were comparable or worse. Better results (by ~20%) were obtained using prediction included high quality identified fragment (TAG) containing at least 7 residues and unidentified additional masses at N- and C-termini (PepNovo+). The latter approach confidently recognized mass-spectrometric artefacts (and probably PTM). Atypical mass changes missed in UNIMOD DB were found (PepNovo+) to be statistically significant at the C-terminus (+23.02, +26.04 and +27.03). Using peptides containing these modifications and milder detection threshold 41 of 48 UPS2 proteins were identified.

Post-transcriptional RNA editing by RNA specific adenosine deaminases (ADAR) was discovered more than two decades ago. It provides additional regulation of animal and human transcriptome. In most cases, it occurs in nervous tissue, where, as a result of the reaction, adenosine is converted to inosine in particular sites of RNA. In case of messenger RNA, during translation, inosine is recognized as guanine leading to amino acid substitutions. Those substitutions are shown to affect substantially the function of proteins, e.g. subunits of the glutamate receptor. Nevertheless, most of the works on RNA editing use analysis of nucleic acids, even those which deal with a coding RNA. In this review, we propose the use of shotgun proteomics based on high resolution liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry for investigation of the effects of RNA editing at the protein level. Recently developed methods of big data processing allow combining the results of various omics techniques, being referred to as proteogenomics. The proposed proteogenomic approach for the analysis of RNA editing at the protein level will directly conduct a qualitative and quantitative analysis of protein edited sequences in the scale of whole proteome.