Search

The article sheds light on the regulations of Roman law appearing Property Law, Law of Obligations) in the works of Pavle Seroglić, the first reviewer of Serbian Civil Code (1844) (The Review of the Civil Code for the Serbian Principality, Promulgated on 25 March 1844 (Pregled Zakonika građanskog za Knjažestvo srbsko, 25. marta 1844. obnarodovanog, published in Bačka vila 4/1845, 114-187). Counterresponse to Response of Mister Miloš Svetic in the Third Linguistic Counterattack (Replika na odgovor gospodina Miloša Svetića u Utuku III Jezikoslovnome, Novi Sad 1847) and Civil Law in Croatian-Slavonian and Serbian-Banat Military Border (Gradansko parvo uc.k. Hrvatsko-slavonskoj i Srpsko-banatskoj Vojničkoj granici, Šeroglic's undated and unpublished commentary of Austrian General Civil Code, kept in the archival materials of Sremski Karlovci Grammar School in the Archives of Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts in that town. The provisions of civil law cited by Seroglić are sorted by similarity with necessary clarifications thereto. This paper, being the first of two sequels of the article related to Seroglic's accounts on Roman law, shall shed light on the author's fragments on is Greek legal transplants in Rome, theory of law, property law and law of obligations, whereas the passages in relation with other branches of Roman law shall be scrutinized in the follow-up article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Bibliotekar (0006-1816) is the property of Serbian Library Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Muzikologija is the property of Serbian Academy of Sciences & Arts, Institute of Musicology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Bibliotekar (0006-1816) is the property of Serbian Library Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The paper analyzes the policy of the Delegation of the Kingdom of SCS at the Peace Conference in Versailles in respect ofVojvodina, which was incorporated into the Kingdom of Serbia by the decision of the Grand National Assembly in Novi Sad dated November 25, 1918, and joined the newly formed Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. The introductory part of the paper summarizes issues important for the work of the Delegation in territorial matters. External factors that posed an objective threat to the Delegation’s policy regarding Vojvodina were analyzed afterwards. The paper further discusses internal factors that disturbed the construction of the unique views of the Yugoslav Delegation in Versailles against Vojvodina. Different concepts on the borders of the Yugoslav state in the Delegation and the work of the Ethnographic Section which was especially significant in determining the territory ofVojvodina and demarcation with neighboring countries were both analyzed. On the basis of these analyzes in the final discussions were given some specific conclusions, as well as an a general assessment of the work of the Delegation of the Kingdom of SCS in Versailles regarding Vojvodina was given. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the paper, the results of survey done at the Faculty of Philosophy in Novi Sad during the school year 2008/2009 are presented. The aim of this paper is to point out both positive and negative sides of the reform, from the point of view of students sociology. A questionnaire has been used in order to obtain relevant data from the students of sociology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper is the result of a mini empirical research on the duration of judicial and public prosecutorial investigations before the High Court in Novi Sad. A total of 100 cases were analyzed, of which 50 cases from 2008 and 50 cases from 2015 and 2016. The first 50 cases were conducted during the validity of the Criminal Procedure code from 2001, while the other 50 cases were conducted during the validity of the Criminal Procedure Code from 2011. In order for the result to be as com parable as possible, we tried to have the same structure of criminal acts represented in both groupes. The author came to the conclusion that a prosecutorial investigation is not faster than a judicial investigation. The se arch for the suspect, the search for the injured party, the impediment of the lawer, the strike of the lawers, the preoccupation of the public prosecutor, etc. contributed to the some what longer duration of the public prosecutorial investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Bibliotekar (0006-1816) is the property of Serbian Library Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The paper presents the experience of the City Library in Novi Sad (CLNS) in the process of preparation for the revision and during the revision and write-off, as well as the problems and doubts encountered during these procedures. A basic overview of legal regulations and standards for revision and write-off in public libraries is also given. In the City Library in Novi Sad the revision and write-off of library materials are performed regularly and according to the legal regulations. The entire fund of CLNS, consisting of more than 550,000 publications, is located in the twenty-seven branches of this library. According to the law, in cases like this, revision should be performed at least once every ten years. Having in mind this, as well as the fact that publications inevitably outdate, CLNS strives to conduct a revision of the entire fund over a ten-year period. Since it is performed in addition to regular and additional activities from the wide scope of current affairs that a public library deals with, this work requires great effort of library professionals. The biggest problem arises by defining and recognizing write-off only within the revision procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zbornik Radova - A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field & Vegetable Crops is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Department B. of the Court of Cassation was established in 1920 upon decision of the Ministerial Council of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. Special Regulation on the Organization of the Department B. of the Belgrade Court of Cassation in Novi Sad was passed on September 17, 1920. Department B. of the Court of Cassation in Novi Sad started operations in February 1921. This judicial body was tasked to adress legal issues, but also to organize legal life in the territory of Vojvodina. In 1930, a special law was passed which prescribed relocation of seat of the Department B. of the Court of Cassation from Novi Sad to Sombor. The Presidency of the Department B. had responsibility to make the necessary arrangements in order to provide the conditions for the transfer of judges, court staff, their families, and also court inventory. However, relocation of the seat of the Department B. of the Court of Cassation wasn't conducted. In the archives there is no data on the reasons that had contributed to the fact that the law on relocation of the Department B. wasn't implemented in practice. Establishment and operation of the Department B. of the Court of Cassation in Novi Sad had a great significance for the consolidation of judicial circumstances in the territory of Vojvodina between the two world wars. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Field & Vegetable Crops Research / Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zbornik Radova - A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field & Vegetable Crops is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zbornik Radova - A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field & Vegetable Crops is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zbornik Radova - A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field & Vegetable Crops is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zbornik Radova - A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field & Vegetable Crops is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zbornik Radova - A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field & Vegetable Crops is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zbornik Radova - A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field & Vegetable Crops is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article presents results of the inquiry empirical research into animal rights which was carried out in 2007 between Novi Sad Faculty of Law students attending to the legal ethics course (N = 125). The analysis showed that 53,6% of respondents accept the opinion that we can't speak on animal right. This opinion is explained by the gender, average note, political and religious orientations of students and their understanding of anthropocentric and biocentric ethics. Only 25,6% of respondents estimate that the God has determinated human control of animal and plant species and even 63,2% that the protection of nature is the care about the beings of the God. Three attitudes were taken over from one empirical research of Zagreb University students in 2005. Here are the comparative figures: 58,1% of respondents in Zagreb accepted equal rights for human beings and animal species and even 71,2% in Novi Sad; that human rights are superior to animal' one (32,5% : 37,6%) and Darwinian conception of struggle for life (20,6% : 44,0%). In the second part of the article the author discusses some theoretical questions about animal rights from the perspective of anthropocentic and biocentric ethics, into their radical and moderate variants. The main conclusion is that the attitudes of our students and theoreticians of law are somewhere between moderate anthropocentrism and moderate biocentrism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zbornik Radova - A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field & Vegetable Crops is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zbornik Radova - A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field & Vegetable Crops is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zbornik Radova - A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field & Vegetable Crops is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zbornik Radova - A Periodical of Scientific Research on Field & Vegetable Crops is the property of Institute of Field & Vegetable Crops and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)