Search

El presente trabajo procura abordar la cosa juzgada y sus nuevas proyecciones por intermedio de la búsqueda bibliográfica para lo cual se tratará, en primer lugar, el marco conceptual de la cosa juzgada, en segundo lugar, la relativización la cosa juzgada, en tercer lugar, los lineamientos que se advierten tanto en lo límites objetivos cuanto en los límites subjetivos del instituto en cuestión, para culminar con las conclusiones de que la cosa juzgada a pesar de ser un instituto pilar del sistema constitucional, es relativa y puede ser revisada en sintonía con nuevas circunstancias que dan lugar a un nuevo caso, que no es igual al anterior decidido, sino que es diferente.

Jury trials have presented themselves in history as an important instrument for the consolidation of democratic processes, because they are a tribunal for which the people are summoned to discuss and directly judge facts that have occurred in their community. With the intention of strengthening the institution after a dictatorial period, the Brazilian Constituent Assembly rescued the sovereignty of the verdicts, and raised the institution and its characteristics to the level of a fundamental clause. From an exploratory perspective, of qualitative nature, the present work intends to investigate how the sovereignty of the verdicts impacts on the legal procedure of the intentional crimes against the life to the point of redefining the initial moment of compliance to the sentence, possibly justifying hypotheses of execution of the sentence in the first, second degree or after the end of the process. It will be discussed the possibility of forming a partial claim preclusion in relation to the criminal responsibility of the defendant, in face of the subjectively complex nature of the condemnatory sentence of the Jury procedure.

The immutability of the decision to close the police investigation and the other information is a subject that is not very much regulated by law and is problematic in Brazilian criminal procedural theory, especially in view of the edition of the Precedent 524 of the brazilian Supreme Court in 1969. The problem that faced in this work is whether the decision to close the police investigation is a judicial act whose content becomes immutable by the res judicata. Methodologically a bibliographic review was carried out to revisit the subjects of the legal nature of the decision to close the investigation and the authority of the res judicata, as well as an analysis was made of the applicability of the precedente 524. It was concluded that the decision to close the police investigation is a final judgment and, when the decision to close the investigation judge the merits, the res judicata became immutable.

Submitted by Rafaella Carine Monterei null (rcarine@stj.jus.br) on 2015-02-04T10:40:48Z No. of bitstreams: 1 procedimiento_especial_proteccion_fenoll.pdf: 794486 bytes, checksum: 9f87ddba5a5d7489b4ec2bd639e7af90 (MD5) Made available in DSpace on 2015-02-04T10:40:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 procedimiento_especial_proteccion_fenoll.pdf: 794486 bytes, checksum: 9f87ddba5a5d7489b4ec2bd639e7af90 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008