Search

Objectives: Arterial stiffness is considered to be an intermediate marker with independent prognostic value. The objective of this study is to assess whether the estimation of arterial stiffness can improve CV risk stratification compared to SCORE in patients at community pharmacies., Methods: Observational prospective epidemiological study in which consecutive individuals entering a participating Community Pharmacy are offered a voluntary measurement of blood pressure and estimation of pulse wave velocity by oscillometry (AGEDIO, IEM®) to stratify their CV risk according to SCORE compared to the use of arterial stiffness., Results: After nine months of recruitment, data from 923 patients (570 women, 353 men) were collected. 16/122 (13.1%) patients under 40 years and 72/364 (19.8%) over 65 years of age presented pathological stiffness and could be classified as high-risk, even though being out of the age-range of SCORE. Of the 437 (47.3%) patients who were susceptible to calculating SCORE, 42/437 patients (9.6%) presented pathological arterial stiffness. Cholesterol values were available in 281 patients (64.3%). Among them, according to SCORE, only 6 (2.1%) fell into the high-risk category., Conclusions: More than half of the subjects who randomly enter a community pharmacy had ages that make it impossible to calculate the CV risk by SCORE. Among them, arterial damage was detected in 18.1%. Of the other half, 9.6% presented arterial damage and, therefore, high CV risk, when SCORE only detected it in 2.1%. Therefore, estimating arterial stiffness in community pharmacies markedly improves detection of high CV risk compared to SCORE., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the co-morbidity, health care use, economical impact, and availability of effective treatments used in generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) patients in a primary care setting (PCS)., Method: A retrospective multicentre population-based study., Setting: Five primary care clinics managed by Badalona Serveis Assistencials S.A., Barcelona, Spain., Participants: Outpatient records of patients over 18 years managed at 5 PCSs during 2006. Patients with and without GAD were compared. In GAD patients, 4 groups were established for comparison, according to pharmacological prescription., Measurements: Main outcomes measures were general, reason/co-morbidity, health care use and primary care cost (visits, diagnostic/therapeutic tests, and drugs). We counted work absenteeism as an indirect cost. Pharmacological prescription was studied according to evidence-based recommendations and Spanish health-approved indications. The statistical analysis included a multivariate model: logistic regression, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), P< .05. RESULTS. Of the 65 767 patients included, 4.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-5.3) had GAD. Patients with/without GAD, the average episode/year was 6.1 versus 4.7 and attendance/year 10.0 versus 7.6; P< .001. GAD was associated with women (odds ratio [OR], 1.8), dyslipidemia (OR, 1.2), smoking (OR, 1.4), depression (OR, 1.2), and cerebrovascular accident (OR, 1.6) (P< .02). The mean direct cost/year adjusted by age, gender and morbidity load was euro686 versus euro557 (P< .001). GAD was associated with higher directs costs. The recommended treatment was followed in 40.1% of total patients (95% CI, 38.4-41.8)., Conclusions: Patients with GAD have greater co-morbidity and higher direct costs in PCS. Means designed to improve the recognition and treatment of these patients should be established in the PCS.