Search

Objective: Cystoscopy and cauterization performed in the operating room is expensive and exposes patients to anesthesia risks. Patient tolerability during office cystoscopy and cauterization is critical to the office management of bladder cancer (BC) and other urologic diseases. We evaluated the risk factors for pain of flexible cystoscopy in the office-setting with emphasis on a sub-group of BC patients who underwent cauterization., Materials and Methods: Retrospective analyses of 110 anonymous patient surveys completed after cystoscopy and/or cauterization. Survey information included age, gender, indication for cystoscopy, number of prior cystoscopies, number of prior office-based cauterizations, anxiety prior/during cystoscopy, and pain during cystoscopy and/or cauterization. Univariate/multivariate and linear-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of pain with clinical parameters., Results: Average pain during cystoscopy (1.75 ± 1.331) was not significantly different when cauterization was also performed (2.37 ± 2.214) (p < 0.001) (p = 0.2840). Patients in the lower age group (<66 years) indicated higher anxiety levels (p = 0.0005), more pain at cystoscopy (P = 0.004) and cauterization (p < 0.001). Although the patients' overall anxiety level was low (1-3/10), it was associated with some pain during cystoscopy (p = 0.0005) and cauterization (p < 0.000). In multivariate analysis, anxiety was the only independent predictor of pain during cystoscopy (p = 0.03, OR: 6.52,95% CI: 1.2-35.6) and cauterization (p = 0.0012, OR: 3.4, 95%CI: 1.6-7.0). In BC patients, pain scores during cystoscopy and cauterization were not significantly different (p = 0.4772) but associated with anxiety., Conclusion: Office-based cystoscopy and cauterization are tolerable with minimal pain. Higher pain levels during cystoscopy were associated with procedure anxiety, and pain during cauterization was associated with procedure anxiety and younger age. Younger and more anxious patients may need more counseling before cystoscopy., (Copyright © 2022 AEU. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Patients with low-grade (LG), grade 1-2, Ta bladder cancer (BC) will frequently have a "recurrence". However, they rarely progress in stage. Although current guidelines mention surveillance and office management for these new or recurrent tumors, transurethral resection (TURBT) is the most common treatment. The purpose of this study is to determine if surveillance and/or office cautery is safe., Materials and Methods: This study was conducted as a retrospective case series analysis of 45 patients who had recurrent LG Ta appearing bladder cancer (BC) and were managed primarily with surveillance and/or office cautery. Patients with carcinoma in-situ were excluded. The primary outcome was stage progression., Results: Median follow up was 62 months. 41 (91%) patients did not progress in stage. Three patients recurred with HG T1 BC; one is receiving systemic immunotherapy. One patient developed HG T2 BC and was treated with a bladder preservation protocol. 40 (89%) patients underwent office cauterization. Eleven received BCG and 26 received post-cautery intravesical chemotherapy. Five (11%) patients developed HG BC during follow up. No patients died. None of the 17 (38%) Hispanic patients had progression., Conclusions: Active surveillance and/or office cautery for patients with small recurrent LG Ta bladder tumors is safe, reduces cost and improves quality of life by avoiding TURBTs., (Copyright © 2022 AEU. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)