Search

Introduction: The management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with a significant use of healthcare resources. In 2009, a digestive diseases nursing consultation, with availability of health telematic media was created in our hospital (CHUVI). The important activity performed in this area encouraged us to quantify the cost savings for the care health system., Aims: 1) To evaluate the results of the implementation of a telematic IBD consultation. 2) To assess the capacity for resolving problems by nurses. 3) To estimate the potential cost savings of telematic nursing consultation in IBD., Material and Method: We collected data on telematic activity from 2009 to 2011. The estimated cost saving was calculated by applying the fees for health services published by our National Health Service (SERGAS) for care in new outbreaks of IBD activity. Data were analyzed with SPSS 15.0 RESULTS: There was a significant linear increase on the resolution of telephone demands by nurses (P=.03) and an important decrease of demands needing medical advice (P<.0001). Focusing on IBD outbreak claims (n=452), only 65 patients (14.38%) required medical attention in emergency services, and 33 (7.3%) were hospitalized. Altogether we calculated an average cost saving since 2009 to 2011 of 73,603€., Conclusions: We found a gradual increase in resolving telematic care demands by nurses. Telematic consultation can lead to significant cost savings, which justify the implementation of a digestive diseases nurse consultation., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.)

Scleroderma or systemic sclerosis (Ssc) is a connective tissue disease which frequently involves the esophagus. Motility disorders, such as a low pressure level in the Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES), and disturbed esophageal peristalsis cause a higher acid exposition and mucosal damage. We study twenty Ssc patients using computerized esophageal manometry, endoscopy and clinical interview looking for prevalence of symptoms, esophageal dysmotility and erosive esophagitis, and trying to find risk factors involved in esophageal damage. Esophagitis was found in 40% of patients. Clinical presentation (diffuse or limited), age and time since diagnosis wer'nt accurate predictors of esophageal involvement. Symptoms such as dysphagia and heartburn had not any significant difference in those with and without esophagitis, so 25% of patients with mucosal damage had no symptoms and 60% of healthy ones complained about them. LES values were not significantly different between the two groups, with a great degree of overlap with normal values. Disturbed motility pattern of aperistalsis was the only factor that identified high and low risk groups for esophagitis, with a high statistical significance (p > 0.02). Mucosal sensitivity in severe esophagitis and pharyngeal and upper esophageal functions were normal in all patients. Impaired peristalsis, with a delayed clearance of acid is the most important factor for mucosal damage in scleroderma. Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux are not a reliable predictor of erosive esophagitis. Endoscopy should be the usual method of diagnosis, in order to make a proper use of therapeutic weapons.