Search

Showing total 2 results
2 results

1. ¿INTERPRETACIONES NO VINCULANTES DE UN "SUPREMO INTÉRPRETE"? REFLEXIONES SOBRE EL ROL DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL PERUANO A PROPÓSITO DE UNA RECIENTE MODIFICACIÓN DE SU REGLAMENTO NORMATIVO.

Author

López Flores, Luciano

Subjects
*CONSTITUTIONAL courts, *CONSTITUTIONAL law, *STATUTORY interpretation, *JURISPRUDENCE, *LEGAL judgments, *JUSTICE administration
Abstract

This paper builds on the amendment of Article 10 of the Normative of the Peruvian Constitutional Court to analyze a problem: the distinctions between the types of decisions handed down by the Constitutional Court (binding precedent, constitutional jurisprudence, interpretative rulings). It is held that this distinction undermines the status and role of Supreme Interpreter of the Constitution which currently holds the Constitutional Court. And it is argued that the type of decisions is inconsistent with that role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2016

2. LA AUTONOMÍA PROCESAL DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL.

Author

Rivera Tirado, María Verónica

Subjects
*CONSTITUTIONAL courts, *CONSTITUTIONAL law, *LEGAL procedure, *CONSTITUTIONS, *JUDGES, *JUSTICE administration
Abstract

The present paper will analyze the procedural autonomy that the Constitutional Court has in order to solve the causes that are put under it knowledge. As it is observed, there are two theses; one of them totally denies the procedural autonomy to the Constitutional Court, but the other one agrees about the procedural autonomy of the Constitutional Court. From my point of view I consider that the Constitutional Court has procedural autonomy, which will be sustained throughout the present investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2012