The four principles of biomedical ethics are widely used in the world for bioethical deliberation. Therefore, it is understood that these theoretical guides are useful for the analysis and resolution of particularly complex ethical controversies arising in clinical and biomedical fields. This paper unfolds an analysis of the basic universal principles, the common universal morality, and some features of each principle. Then it discusses some problems posed by critics of European biolaw who have provided alternative frameworks of principles that are nonuniversal to culture. Finally, it shows how universal moral principles are connected to human rights, how rules and rights are specified to become detailed and practical for certain moralities, and how these ideas are connected with problems of justification in bioethics and biolaw. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
CULTURAL relativism, ETHNOCENTRISM, CULTURAL relations, MULTICULTURALISM, VALUES (Ethics), ETHICS, CULTURE & globalization, CROSS-cultural communication
Abstract
El artículo habla de dos actitudes que, dentro de un mundo globalizado, van en detrimento de una comunicación interpersonal productiva entre personas de diversas culturas. Estas dos actitudes son el etnocentrismo y el relativismo cultural. Se intenta probar que el etnocentrismo puede ser una consecuencia de un relativismo cultural radical. Se dan razones por evitar ambos y se propone "un sentido no radical de relativismo cultural" para la comprensión de otras culturas. Se hablan también de unas cuestiones de moral relacionadas.
Published
2003
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.