Search

Good relations between Argentina and Uruguay were disturbed in 2003 due to the project to build two cellulose manufacturing plants for the paper industry on the left side of the Uruguay River, which marks the frontier between these countries. Argentina claims that with the unilateral authorisation of the plants, its neighbor violated obligations assumed by virtue of general international law (including environmental norms) and the 1975 Statute of the Uruguay River. The apparent, official irregularity was met with actions undertaken by groups of Argentine citizens, who blocked the bridges that connect the two countries. For its part, Uruguay has condemned the lack of action of the Argentine government regarding the blockages of the roads, which severely harmed the Uruguayan economy. In the face of these situations, this work presents an analysis of the responsibility incurred by these two countries as a consequence of the breach of international obligations. The work concludes that, in both cases, there were deficiencies regarding the due diligence expected from both governments in terms of the principles of contemporary international law. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]