Search

This paper deals with the model of constitutional control in Peru. The author comes to historical, conceptual and jurisprudential sources for, on the one hand, identify and understand the context that gives rise to its origin and secondly, to analyze its procedural operation in Peru, baring the deficiencies that presents. Hence it is claimed that the Peruvian judicial review is a "model even put together". Finally, it states that the exploration of judicial review serves to clarify some concepts that link it very closely with constitutional interpretation, in the light not only of what holds the current comparison doctrine but also its reception in the jurisprudence of the Peruvian Constitutional Court. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper is based on the idea that the constitutional evolution of Peru designates a "process" in which happend gradually was consolidated an alteration in the structure of political and social relations that developed in our territory as a result of his inflection, or regulation based on constitutional texts or legal documents that served as such. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper develops the fields of social market economy regarding the constitutional protection of the healthy and balanced environment. It also raises the challenges of public and private investment in relation to extractive industries located in Peru. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper builds on the amendment of Article 10 of the Normative of the Peruvian Constitutional Court to analyze a problem: the distinctions between the types of decisions handed down by the Constitutional Court (binding precedent, constitutional jurisprudence, interpretative rulings). It is held that this distinction undermines the status and role of Supreme Interpreter of the Constitution which currently holds the Constitutional Court. And it is argued that the type of decisions is inconsistent with that role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The increasing recognition of social rights in the history of Peruvian constitutional texts dating from 1920, parelelo to its origin in the constitutions of Querétaro (1917) and Weimar (1919), respectively, but their maximum theoretical and jurisprudential development is recent, with the current 1993 Constitution. The Constitutional Court has argued that rights are not treated second rate compared to civil and political, and has forced the Peruvian government to make the principle of Progressive for its full realization. This paper proposes the recognition approach, jurisprudence and effectiveness of social rights in the Charter of 1993, and as part of some Latin American constitutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present paper will analyze the procedural autonomy that the Constitutional Court has in order to solve the causes that are put under it knowledge. As it is observed, there are two theses; one of them totally denies the procedural autonomy to the Constitutional Court, but the other one agrees about the procedural autonomy of the Constitutional Court. From my point of view I consider that the Constitutional Court has procedural autonomy, which will be sustained throughout the present investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Separation power' theory has already few centuries over it shoulders but it has never loose its validity. At the beginning it was used to assume that such a theory was based in a strict and simplistic division of the main state functions, when in fact, since its first formulation involved levels of collaboration and control among them; being this the only way to guarantee the state efficacy and freedom as a last resort. In this way, separation but with collaboration and control was articulated by the North American presidential system and reflected, with their adaptations, singularities, and deformations in our country. Precisely the argument of this paper is oriented to show how our initial constitutionalism had collected the fundaments of the separation power's theory, keeping them alive till nowadays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]