Search

Copyright of Jurídicas CUC is the property of Corporacion Universidad de la Costa, CUC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The objective of this paper is to analyze the relationships between formal, political, economic and social agreements that derive from the institutional design derived from constitutional law that were the pattern of governability in modern pre-covid19 society, and decisions imposed by governments after the declaration of a pandemic by the WHO in March 2020. The protection of the life project, governability as a government relationship with the administration and the application of biopower, are examined in light of the currents that see it with the potential to deepen authoritarianism and those who observe the possibility of reconciling biopower with democracy without implying that there is an operation in favor of undermining it. It is concluded that the positive or pernicious relationship between these elements for the construction of the postpandemic society will depend on the strength of the democratic institutionality, however, a fairly accepted attention, examines this relationship from the perspective of danger to freedom society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of the work is to analyze the State as the object of the political sciences to understand the theoretical-- epistemological complexity involved in its conceptualization from utilitarian, functionalist, neo-institutional to the (re) discovery of the Weberian view of the phenomenon. The bibliographic review, analytically, concluded that the conceptions of the State as an autonomous actor of exclusive legal-institutional conception and instrument for the role of processor of exogenous claims, and/or as the exclusive object of the theory and philosophy, has been overwhelmed by the explanatory urgencies that the social, political and legal sciences today have the product of dynamic realities, positioning the State in a promoting action, in compensation with the unrealizable meta-narratives of the economic, social, autonomous development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]