Search

The purpose of the article is to analyze what is the contribution of the invested classroom strategy in the achievement of learning in communication research in undergraduate university students. The study design was quasi-experimental with pre-and post-test to the experimental and control group. The sample was made up of 50 students (section 1 and 2) of Communication Sciences of the Santiago Antúnez de Mayolo National University (UNASAM) enrolled in the communication research subject in the 2021-I semester. The rubric and the checklist were applied to measure the variables and results that were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the T-Studnt. It was concluded that despite all the obstacles faced by the application of the flipped classroom strategy for the achievement of competencybased learning, the data resulting from the present research reliably demonstrate the effectiveness of this 4 strategy in educational processes because significant differences were identified in the achievement of research learning in communication between the control and experimental group, the latter being the one that reached high levels of achievement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores is the property of Dilemas Contemporaneos: Educacion, Politica y Valores and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The present study analyzes the effects generated by a metacognitive scaffolding and the cognitive style (Field Dependent/Independent-FDI) in the cognitive load, the metacognitive awareness and the achievement of learning when the students interact with an environment of e-Learning. 67 undergraduate students from the city of Bogotá (Colombia) participated, divided into two groups. One interacted with a learning environment with a metacognitive scaffolding and the other, without it. The EFT test was used to determine the cognitive style of the apprentices and the MAI test established the metacognitive awareness. Data were analyzed with a MANCOVA analysis. Results suggest differences between the intrinsic and extrinsic cognitive load in field dependent students due to the interaction between the metacognitive scaffolding and their cognitive style. Students who interacted with the metacognitive scaffolding showed a greater learning achievement and a better ability to monitoring their learning process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Latin-American Journal of Physics Education is the property of Latin-American Physics Education Network and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The aim of this paper is to examine the effects of a metacognitive scaffolding called Amadis and the cognitive style in the Field Dependence-Independence dimension, learning achievement and self-regulatory capacity in high school students, when interacting with a b-learning environment about a physics topic. The study involved 182 students from six eleventh-grade classes from a public school in Bogotá (Colombia). Three classes interacted with a b-learning environment that contained an Amadis metacognitive scaffolding. The other three classes interacted with the b-learning environment that did not have the scaffolding. Students were administered the eft masked figures test, in order to classify them as field dependent, intermediate and independent subjects. The mslq questionnaire was used to measure self-regulation indicators. A Mancova analysis was carried out to determine differences among the groups of students. The results indicate that there are significant differences in learning achievement due to the effect of metacognitive scaffolding. The students who interacted with it got higher results than those who did not. Also, the dissimilarities in the learning achievement of students from different cognitive styles were eliminated. Similarly, the scaffolding favored some students' self-regulation of learning indicators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Formación Universitaria is the property of Centro de Informacion Tecnologica (CIT) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Estudios Pedagogicos (Valdivia) is the property of Estudios Pedagogicos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Papeles: Revista de la Facultad de Educación Universidad Antonio Nariño is the property of Universidad Antonio Narino and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista del Centro de Investigación. Universidad La Salle is the property of Universidad La Salle and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study examined the effect of a computing environment that incorporates a module to enable the academic efficacy on goal setting, self-efficacy and learning achievement of elementary students learning to solve problems with fractional numbers, individually and in pairs. The interaction between these variables and the cognitive style, in the field dependence-independence dimension, was explored. 50 fifth graders of a public institution participated in this research. The EFT (Embedded Figures Test) was used to measure cognitive style. Academic achieving was assessed with the computing environment. Similarly, the goals formulated by the student were recorded in the software. Selfefficacy was measured using the MSLQ test. For the treatment of the data, a MANCOVA was performed. Results showed, higher goal setting for students working in pairs, compared to those working individually. Moreover, field independent students set more demanding goals for themselves than their field dependent peers; no significant differences were found for learning achievement between students from different cognitive styles. Regarding efficacy, there were no significant differences between students who interacted individually and in pairs. This way, it is possible to conclude that efficiency modules on the achievement of individual learning; however, self-efficacy was favored equally in individual work and in pairs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Umbral Científico is the property of Universidad Manuela Beltran and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)