Search

Your search keyword '"Tugwell, Peter"' showing total 4 results
Start Over Author "Tugwell, Peter" Language spanish
4 results on '"Tugwell, Peter"'

1. EFECTOS ADVERSOS DE LOS PRODUCTOS BIOLÓGICOS: UN METANÁLISIS DE REDES Y RESUMEN COCHRANE.

Author

SINGH, JASVINDER A., WELLS, GEORGE A., CHRISTENSEN, ROBIN, GHOGOMU, ELIZABETH TANJONG, MAXWELL, LARA, MACDONALD, JOHN K., FILIPPINI, GRAZIELLA, SKOETZ, NICOLE, FRANCIS, DAMIAN, LOPES, LUCIANE C., GUYATT, GORDON H., SCHMITT, JOCHEN, LA MANTIA, LOREDANA, WEBERSCHOCK, TOBIAS, ROOS, JULIANA F., SIEBERT, HENDRIK, HERSHAN, SARAH, PTLUNN, MICHAEL, TUGWELL, PETER, and BUCHBINDER, RACHELLE

Published
2012
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Extensión PRISMA-Equidad 2012: guías para la escritura y la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas enfocadas en la equidad en salud.

Author

Welch, Vivian, Petticrew, Mark, Tugwell, Peter, Moher, David, O'Neill, Jennifer, Waters, Elizabeth, and White, Howard

Subjects
*SYSTEMATIC reviews, *GROUP decision making, *HEALTH care rationing, *EVALUATION of medical care, *MEDICAL care use, *QUALITY assurance, *REPORT writing, *WORLD health, *EVIDENCE-based medicine, *PROFESSIONAL practice, *HEALTH equity, *INFORMATION needs
Abstract

There is a global imperative to tackle national and international health inequities--defined as unfair and avoidable differences in health. One step in reaching this goal is to improve the rigorous, scientific evidence base on the impacts of policies on inequities in health outcomes, resource allocation, and use. Systematic reviews are increasingly recognized as a valuable source of evidence for both health care and health systems decision making, yet very few systematic reviews report effects on health equity. We developed consensus-based reporting guidelines for equity-focused systematic reviews in order to help reviewers identify, extract, and synthesise evidence on equity in systematic reviews. Increased use of these reporting guidelines will help improve the reporting of effects on both inequities in health outcomes and health care use across gender, socioeconomic position, and other characteristics, both in systematic reviews and eventually primary research, thus contributing to the global agenda to improve health equity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2013

4. PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity.

Author

Welch, Vivian, Petticrew, Mark, Tugwell, Peter, Moher, David, O'Neill, Jennifer, Waters, Elizabeth, and White, Howard

Subjects
*SYSTEMATIC reviews, *DECISION making, *HEALTH care rationing, *HEALTH policy, *WORLD health, *HEALTH equity
Abstract

There is a global imperative to tackle national and international health inequities- defined as unfair and avoidable differences in health. One step in reaching this goal is to improve the rigorous, scientific evidence base on the impacts of policies on inequities in health outcomes, resource allocation, and use. Systematic reviews are increasingly recognized as a valuable source of evidence for both health care and health systems decision making, yet very few systematic reviews report effects on health equity. We developed consensus-based reporting guidelines for equity-focused systematic reviews in order to help reviewers identify, extract, and synthesise evidence on equity in systematic reviews. Increased use of these reporting guidelines will help improve the reporting of effects on both inequities in health outcomes and health care use across gender, socioeconomic position, and other characteristics, both in systematic reviews and eventually primary research, thus contributing to the global agenda to improve health equity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results