Search

Copyright of Investigaciones Turisticas is the property of Investigaciones Turisticas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Tempo (1413-7704) is the property of Universidade Federal Fluminense, Departamento de Historia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Archivos de Ciencias de la Educacion is the property of Universidad Nacional de La Plata and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Since its appearance in 2020, Brazil and Mexico have been among the most affected countries in the world by covid-19. Their respective presidents, Jair Bolsonaro and Andrés Manuel López Obrador (known as AMLO), have played a leading role in specific policies during the pandemic. Their choices were both singular and counter- intuitive. On the health front, AMLO initially underplayed the seriousness of the situation, and the Brazilian president, Bolsonaro, defended a frankly negationist attitude, with a dramatic balance sheet, without his popularity being seriously affected. On the economic front, they have chosen policies that contradict not only each other but also their own supposed ideological stances. Bolsonaro, who is ranked on the far right, has implemented an emergency transfer program on a scale comparable to those of developed countries and the most massive the country has ever seen. Conversely, AMLO, considered a progressist, provided just a minimum policy package, maintaining his previous electoral program. By adopting a comparative approach and mobilizing a unique and diversified set of data, the objective of this paper is to explore these apparent contradictions. After having established the precise diagnosis of the policies implemented to deal with the crisis and the economic and health situation in the two countries during the 2020-2022 period, we propose an original interpretation grid of the central role played by the two presidents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this article is to analyze how the public university has been conceived and treated by the federal government from the impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff, especially through a narrative that depreciates it in terms of its role and performance, attributing to it a certain sense or meaning. The Brazilian university is going through a difficult moment in its history, as it has been suffering constant budget cuts, compromising its operational condition, a situation aggravated by the pandemic of the new coronavirus. In Brazil, we assume that the denialism observed constitutes a deliberate strategy with the objective of weakening and disqualifying the critical and reflective thinking that puts in check the advancement of the interests of global financial capital. It serves a broader project, a form of social, economic and cultural existence of a neoliberal nature imbricated in a geopolitics of knowledge that favors certain interests of certain groups and nations. Such a project therefore implies the defense of a worldview that must be established as the correct view of the mode of existence. It is the defense of single thought. Although in practice its autonomy is more illusory than real, it is a fact that, when the university makes use of this freedom, when it «bothers», it is that it suffers the attacks of certain groups, especially those who are in a position of strategic decision, like governments, and perceive criticism as a threat to certain interests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista de Antropología Social is the property of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Española de Sociología is the property of Federacion Espanola de Sociologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Española de Sociología is the property of Federacion Espanola de Sociologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Human Review is the property of Eagora Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodistico is the property of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodistico is the property of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Epistemologia divisão do trabalho cognitivo negacionismo pandemiaFor any topic on which one is not an expert, one must defer to more knowledgeable others. This goes against the expectations of epistemic autonomy and of a democratic division of knowledge. One solution to this tension is to give in to these expectations, which is equivalent to abandoning knowledge. Another solution is to restrict its effects to topics in which we have some practical interest. This proposal is unstable, because virtually any topic may be of practical interest, due to the identitary role of theories. These pressures for a symmetrical division of knowledge go against a central feature of human culture the cooperative production of knowledge. A human group always knows more than each of its members which means that, for everyone, part of what is known by one’s own group remains opaque. The refusal of the cognitive division of labor is one of the sources of denialism. There are three elements that favor this effect: the way of information spreads on the internet, the growth of inequality, and the far-right attacks on institutions that are responsible for the production of knowledge. The pandemic requires a great effort of knowledge. But along with knowledge, comes the demand for trust in opaque contents. The pandemic asks us for more trust, while it creates an atmosphere of deep distrust [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista de Filosofía UIS is the property of Universidad Industrial de Santander and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Cultura Latinoamericana is the property of Universidad Catolica de Colombia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Arxiu d'Etnografia de Catalunya is the property of Universitat Rovira I Virgili and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The relationship between communication management, denialism and authoritarianism is very important for reflecting on the consequences of a public health communication policy. Based on the Brazilian context in which the country's highest authority has denied evidence of the seriousness of the pandemic, this article analyzes the Covid-19 risk communication (RC) developed by the federal government itself through the Ministry of Health. We created four CR variables: transparency, risks, adequacy and temporality to analyze the content of the 24 pieces that were part of the communication campaigns of the Ministry of Health, between March and September 2020. The results show the predominance of institutional communication, almost 50% of the pieces were to make the government aware, to the detriment of actions that could alert the population about the risks of the new coronavirus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

La criminalización del negacionismo genera controversias que incluyen denunciar los déficits en la construcción de la lesividad penal en estos delitos (no se verifica que atenten contra un interés o derecho ajeno y no resulta claro delinear el bien jurídico que se procura tutelar). Este trabajo aborda la lesividad desde la interrelación entre criminología y derecho penal para legitimar la intervención penal frente al negacionismo, adoptando el punto de vista autónomo y externo de la criminología, en tanto emancipación de la subalternidad como disciplina auxiliar al derecho penal. El texto parte de las criminologías del siglo XXI que intentan dar respuesta a estas prácticas, con el resorte de los Estudios de genocidio que entienden al genocidio como un complejo proceso social con una serie de momentos que lo integran que no culminan con el aniquilamiento material, sino que continúan en los modos de representar y narrar esa experiencia de aniquilamiento e integrando al negacionismo como la última etapa. Asimismo se rescata la posición de Ferrajoli, quien propone una drástica revisión epistemológica de la criminología, haciendo hincapié en la resignificación de la ofensividad y la apuesta a un constitucionalismo internacional. Desde esta indagación se profundiza la construcción robusta del daño negacionista como afectación a la dignidad en una doble perspectiva: individual (como ofensa a los sobrevivientes y familiares) y colectiva (como necesidad de reconocimiento social del respeto a su dignidad). Y en esta segunda modalidad (dimensión social de la dignidad) se inserta el derecho a la memoria (como categoría del derecho internacional que integra la reparación simbólica a las víctimas en su modalidad de satisfacción). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación is the property of Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseno y Comunicacion and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ecología Política is the property of Fundacio ENT and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Memoria Americana is the property of Memoria Americana, Cuadernos de Etnohistoria and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Universitas, Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas is the property of Universidad Politecnica Salesiana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Aposta is the property of Aposta and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Vínculos de Historia is the property of Vinculos de Historia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Politicas y Sociales is the property of Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Politicas y Sociales and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The negationism is one of the main ideological elements of the contemporary Nazism. This article analyses its installation and development in Chile during the eighties thanks to the writer Miguel Serrano and the reaction of the Jewish community of Chile. We have considerate the Miguel Serrano's books of this period, his publicappearances, the public meetings organized by him and the reaction of the Jewish community expressed in the press. Finally, this article proposes some ideas about the function of the negationism for the Chilean Nazism of the eighties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]