1. King-Devick Test Time Varies by Testing Modality
- Author
-
Breton M Asken, Zachary M Houck, Justus D. Ortega, Michael S. Jaffee, Julianne D. Schmidt, Thomas W. McAllister, Michael McCrea, Anthony P. Kontos, Kimberly G. Harmon, Nicole L Hoffman, Jonathan K. Boone, Thomas A. Buckley, Steven P. Broglio, Sara P D Chrisman, and James R Clugston
- Subjects
Male ,Paper ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Neuropsychological Tests ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Outcome Assessment, Health Care ,Concussion ,Confidence Intervals ,Humans ,Medicine ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Students ,Setting national ,Brain Concussion ,Modality (human–computer interaction) ,Modalities ,business.industry ,030229 sport sciences ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Test (assessment) ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Athletes ,Athletic Injuries ,Minicomputers ,Physical therapy ,Female ,Completion time ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Cohort study - Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore differences in baseline King-Devick Test (KD) completion time between 2 testing modalities: (1) spiral-bound paper cards (cards) and (2) iPad application (iPad). DESIGN Cross-sectional cohort analysis. SETTING National Collegiate Athlete Association (NCAA) institutions. PARTICIPANTS Student athletes from 13 women's and 11 men's collegiate sports who completed KD baseline testing as part of their first year in the Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium from 2014 to 2016 (n = 2003, 52.2% male). INDEPENDENT VARIABLES King-Devick Test modalities; cards or iPad. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Baseline KD completion time (seconds). RESULTS Mean baseline KD completion time of the iPad modality group [42.8 seconds, 95% confidence interval (CI), 42.1-43.3] was 2.8 seconds (95% CI, 2.1-3.4) greater than the cards group (40.0 seconds, 95% CI, 39.7-40.3) (t(1, 1010.7) = -8.0, P < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS Baseline KD performance is slower when tested on an iPad than when tested on spiral-bound paper cards. The 2 KD modalities should not be used interchangeably in concussion assessments because differences in the modalities can lead to time differences similar in magnitude to those used to indicate concussion. From a research perspective, modality may influence interpretation and/or synthesis of findings across studies.
- Published
- 2018